ClpP: a structurally dynamic protease regulated by AAA+ proteins.

Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1.
Journal of Structural Biology (Impact Factor: 3.36). 05/2012; 179(2):202-10. DOI:10.1016/j.jsb.2012.05.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Proteolysis is an important process for many aspects of bacterial physiology. Clp proteases carry out a large proportion of protein degradation in bacteria. These enzymes assemble in complexes that combine the protease ClpP and the unfoldase, ClpA or ClpX. ClpP oligomerizes as two stacked heptameric rings enclosing a central chamber containing the proteolytic sites. ClpX and ClpA assemble into hexameric rings that bind both axial surfaces of the ClpP tetradecamer forming a barrel-like complex. ClpP requires association with ClpA or ClpX to unfold and thread protein substrates through the axial pore into the inner chamber where degradation occurs. A gating mechanism regulated by the ATPase exists at the entry of the ClpP axial pore and involves the N-terminal regions of the ClpP protomers. These gating motifs are located at the axial regions of the tetradecamer but in most crystal structures they are not visible. We also lack structural information about the ClpAP or ClpXP complexes. Therefore, the structural details of how the axial gate in ClpP is regulated by the ATPases are unknown. Here, we review our current understanding of the conformational changes that ClpA or ClpX induce in ClpP to open the axial gate and increase substrate accessibility into the degradation chamber. Most of this knowledge comes from the recent crystal structures of ClpP in complex with acyldepsipeptides (ADEP) antibiotics. These small molecules are providing new insights into the gating mechanism of this protease because they imitate the interaction of ClpA/ClpX with ClpP and activate its protease activity.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The bacterial protease ClpP consists of fourteen subunits that assemble into two stacked heptameric rings. The central degradation chamber can be accessed via axial pores. In free ClpP these pores are obstructed by the N-terminal regions of the seven subunits at either end of the barrel. Acyldepsipeptides (ADEPs) are antibacterial compounds that bind in hydrophobic clefts surrounding the pore region, causing the pores to open up. The ensuing uncontrolled degradation of intracellular proteins is responsible for the antibiotic activity of ADEPs. Recently published X-ray structures yielded conflicting models regarding the conformation adopted by the N-terminal regions in the open state. Here, we use hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to obtain complementary insights into the ClpP behavior with and without ADEP1. Ligand binding causes rigidification of the equatorial belt, accompanied by destabilization in the vicinity of the binding clefts. The N-terminal regions undergo rapid deuteration with only minor changes after ADEP1 binding, revealing a lack of stable H-bonding. Our data point to a mechanism where the pore opening mechanism is mediated primarily by changes in the packing of N-terminal nonpolar side chains. We propose that a "hydrophobic plug" causes pore blockage in ligand-free ClpP. ADEP1 binding provides new hydrophobic anchor points that nonpolar N-terminal residues can interact with. In this way ADEP1 triggers the transition to an open conformation, where nonpolar moieties are clustered around the rim of the pore. This proposed mechanism helps reconcile the conflicting models that had been put forward earlier.
    Journal of Molecular Biology 08/2013; · 3.91 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bacterial Clp proteases are important for protein turnover and homeostasis in order to maintain vital cellular functions particularly under stress conditions. Apart from their crucial role in general protein quality control by degrading abnormally folded or otherwise aberrant or malfunctioning proteins, their temporally and spatially precise proteolysis of key regulatory proteins additionally guides several developmental processes like cell motility, genetic competence, cell differentiation, sporulation as well as important aspects of virulence. Due to their apparent relevance for many physiological processes and their conservation among diverse bacterial species including human pathogens, Clp proteases have attracted considerable attention as targets for antibacterial action in recent years. Particularly a novel class of potent acyldepsipeptide antibiotics unleashes ClpP, the uniform proteolytic core unit of the degradative Clp complexes, to bring about bacterial death via uncontrolled proteolysis of proteins that are essential for bacterial viability. In addition, covalent inhibition of the catalytic center of ClpP by another class of small molecule inhibitors is investigated in the context of virulence inhibition. Both antibacterial mechanisms constitute innovative approaches with the potential to control infections caused by multi-resistant bacterial pathogens due to the lack of cross-resistance to established antibiotic classes.
    International journal of medical microbiology: IJMM 09/2013; · 4.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Protein quality control within the cell requires the interplay of many molecular chaperones and proteases. When this quality control system is disrupted, polypeptides follow pathways leading to misfolding, inactivity and aggregation. Among the repertoire of molecular chaperones are remarkable proteins that forcibly untangle protein aggregates, called disaggregases. Structural and biochemical studies have led to new insights into how these proteins collaborate with co-chaperones and utilize ATP to power protein disaggregation. Understanding how energy-dependent protein disaggregating machines function is universally important and clinically relevant, as protein aggregation is linked to medical conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyloidosis and prion diseases.
    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10/2013; 14(10):617-29. · 37.16 Impact Factor