Podoplanin Lymphatic Density and Invasion Correlate With Adverse Clinicopathologic and Biological Factors and Survival in Neuroblastomas
ABSTRACT Neuroblastoma (NB) is a challenging problem in oncology, as the majority of patients have lymphatic and/or hematogenous metastases at diagnosis. We investigated the prognostic significance of lymphatic density (LD) and invasion (LI) in NBs using the lymphatic endothelial marker podoplanin (PDPN). A total of 77 neuroblastic tumors and 9 ganglioneuromas (GNs) were immunostained for PDPN using D2-40 antibody. Intratumoral lymphatics were identified in 87% (67/77) of NBs and 7/9 GNs. The LD counts were significantly higher (P<0.01) in NBs (median=19.6, range=0.00 to 89.3) than in GNs (median=10.2, range=0 to 18.7). LI, assessed in D2-40-stained lymphatics, was present in 52/67 (78%) NBs. LDs were significantly higher in NBs from patients with adverse clinical factors (advanced-stage, high-risk group, primary abdominal compared with extra-abdominal sites), biological factors (MYCN amplification, 1p deletion, 17q gain), and distant lymph node metastases. LDs and LI were also significantly higher in NBs belonging to an unfavorable pathology prognostic group and in those with a high mitosis-karyorrhexis index. High LD and the presence of LI correlated with a shorter event-free survival in univariable analyses. High LD and the presence of LI were also associated with worse overall survival, although the association was less strong. In conclusion, increased LDs and the presence of LI correlated with adverse clinicopathologic and biological factors and survival. These findings suggest that PDPN has the potential to provide valuable prognostic information to clinicians for risk assessment in NBs.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Ramani P, Nash R, Radevsky L, Patel A, Luckett M & Rogers C (2012) Histopathology VEGF-C, VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 expression in peripheral neuroblastic tumours Aims: More than 50% of neuroblastomas (NBs) present with haematogenous and/or lymphatic metastasis; however, little is known about the clinicopathological significance in NBs of the key lymphangiogenesis growth factors vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C and VEGF-D and the receptor VEGFR-3. Methods and results: Ninety-three NBs and nine ganglioneuromas (GNs) were immunostained for VEGF-C, VEGF-D and VEGFR-3. VEGF-C and VEGF-D were present in 76% and 82% of the NBs, respectively. There was no significant difference in VEGF-C expression between NBs and GNs. VEGF-D expression was significantly higher in NBs compared with GNs and in MYCN-amplified NBs. VEGFR-3 tumoral cell expression (VEGFR-3c), present in 48% of the NBs, was significantly higher in NBs from children ≥18 months at presentation and those belonging to a high-risk group. VEGFR-3 lymphovascular density was increased significantly in NBs compared with GNs and in NBs associated with adverse clinicopathological and biological factors. Lymphovascular invasion, assessed in VEGFR-3-stained vessels, was present in ∼50% of NBs. Cox regression analyses demonstrated that VEGFR-3c expression was associated with a significantly shorter event-free survival and that its effect was independent of the important pathological variable, mitosis-karyorrhexis index. Conclusions: VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 up-regulation support tumour progression in NB and VEGFR-3c may provide a useful prognostic marker in NBs.Histopathology 04/2012; 61(6). DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04307.x · 3.30 Impact Factor