Article

Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere.

School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 05/2012; 109(22):8606-11. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116791109
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As they have in response to past climatic changes, many species will shift their distributions in response to modern climate change. However, due to the unprecedented rapidity of projected climatic changes, some species may not be able to move their ranges fast enough to track shifts in suitable climates and associated habitats. Here, we investigate the ability of 493 mammals to keep pace with projected climatic changes in the Western Hemisphere. We modeled the velocities at which species will likely need to move to keep pace with projected changes in suitable climates. We compared these velocities with the velocities at which species are able to move as a function of dispersal distances and dispersal frequencies. Across the Western Hemisphere, on average, 9.2% of mammals at a given location will likely be unable to keep pace with climate change. In some places, up to 39% of mammals may be unable to track shifts in suitable climates. Eighty-seven percent of mammalian species are expected to experience reductions in range size and 20% of these range reductions will likely be due to limited dispersal abilities as opposed to reductions in the area of suitable climate. Because climate change will likely outpace the response capacity of many mammals, mammalian vulnerability to climate change may be more extensive than previously anticipated.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
213 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As a physiologist, one can often not help but marvel at the versatility of the mammalian body with regard to its adaptability to changing environments. In an earlier contribution to the Exacta series, we have discussed the latest developments in research on thermoregulation, introducing the tiny water bear (tardigrade), which is equipped with resources to not only withstand temperatures near absolute zero or centuries without any water, but also being shot into outer space (Bondke Persson and Persson, 2012). With increasing structural complexity, organisms become, obviously, more restricted to certain environmental conditions. Mammals, nevertheless, survive and often thrive in environments ranging from tropical rainforests to eternal ice, but are, however, more limited than small eukaryotes when it comes to pressure, radiation or toxin exposure, to name but a few. Changing climatic conditions induce a change in the spectrum of mammals inhabiting certain regions of the globe (World Wildlife Fund, 2014); mammals try to migrate or adapt – if they can (Schloss et al., 2012).This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Acta Physiologica 07/2014; · 4.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evolutionary rescue occurs when adaptive evolutionary change restores positive growth to declining populations and prevents extinction. Here we outline the diagnostic features of evolutionary rescue and distinguish this phenomenon from demographic and genetic rescue. We then synthesize the rapidly accumulating theoretical and experimental studies of evolutionary rescue, highlighting the demographic, genetic, and extrinsic factors that affect the probability of rescue. By doing so, we clarify the factors to target through management and conservation. Additionally, we identify several putative cases of evolutionary rescue in nature, but conclude that compelling evidence remains elusive. We conclude with a horizon scan of where the field might develop, highlighting areas of potential application, and suggest areas where experimental evaluation will help to evaluate theoretical predictions.
    Trends in ecology & evolution. 01/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Solar geoengineering has been suggested as a tool that might reduce damage from anthropogenic climate change. Analysis often assumes that geoengineering would be used to maintain a constant global mean temperature. Under this scenario, geoengineering would be required either indefinitely (on societal time scales) or until atmospheric CO2 concentrations were sufficiently reduced. Impacts of climate change, however, are related to the rate of change as well as its magnitude. We thus describe an alternative scenario in which solar geoengineering is used only to constrain the rate of change of global mean temperature; this leads to a finite deployment period for any emissions pathway that stabilizes global mean temperature. The length of deployment and amount of geoengineering required depends on the emissions pathway and allowable rate of change, e.g. in our simulations, reducing the maximum approximately 0.3°C per decade rate of change in an RCP 4.5 pathway to 0.1°C per decade would require geoengineering for 160 years; under RCP 6.0, the required time nearly doubles. We demonstrate that feedback control can limit rates of change in a climate model. Finally, we note that a decision to terminate use of solar geoengineering does not automatically imply rapid temperature increases: feedback could be used to limit rates of change in a gradual phase-out. © 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
    Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences. 12/2014; 372(2031).

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
47 Downloads
Available from
May 27, 2014