The effectiveness of adhering to clinical-practice guidelines for anxiety disorders in secondary mental health care: The results of a cohort study in the Netherlands

Health-care Psychologist and PhD Student, HSK Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands Psychiatrist, Department of Psychiatry, UMC St. Radboud, Overwaal Centre for Anxiety Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Extraordinary Professor of Health-care Psychology and Clinical Psychologist, SPON Postdoctoral Education, Academic Centre Social Sciences, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center and GGZinGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (Impact Factor: 1.08). 05/2012; 19(5). DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01851.x
Source: PubMed


Background  While studies into the implementation of clinical practice guidelines for mental health care are scarce, studies on the effectiveness of implementing practice guidelines for anxiety disorders appear to be entirely non-existent. Objective  To examine whether adherence to anxiety disorder clinical practice guidelines in secondary mental health care yields superior treatment results than non-adherence. Method  A closed-cohort study of 181 outpatients with an anxiety disorder or hypochondriasis who were treated in a routine mental health setting. Preceding the inclusion of these 181 patients, a start was made on the implementation of the Dutch national multidisciplinary practice guidelines for anxiety disorders. Patients were asked to complete several questionnaires before the start of treatment and again 1 year later. The medical records of these patients were reviewed to assess guideline adherence. Ultimately, adherence or non-adherence to the different treatment algorithms described in the guidelines was related to changes in the severity of psychiatric symptomatology, psychiatric functioning, general well-being and satisfaction with treatment. Results  Compared with patients whose treatment did not adhere to the guidelines, those whose treatment adhered to the guidelines were found to have greater symptom reduction after 1 year (P < 0.01). The latter group of patients also rated their satisfaction with their treatment significantly higher (P = 0.01). No significant differences were found after 1 year with respect to changes in impairment of functioning and quality of life in the two groups of patients. Conclusions  Adherence to anxiety disorder guidelines yields superior treatment results and increased patient satisfaction with treatment when compared with patients whose treatment did not adhere to the clinical guidelines. These results should encourage a more widespread implementation of such guidelines in mental health care facilities.

Download full-text


Available from: Maarten K Van Dijk,
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Several countries have developed guidelines for anxiety disorders containing algorithms that summarize the recommended treatment steps for these disorders. It is important to know which patients have a poor prognosis for treatment according to such algorithms. Aims: To investigate the predictive power of variables known to be able to influence treatment prognosis in situations where practice guidelines for anxiety disorders are adhered to. Method: To study the predictive power of variables that are known to be able to influence treatment prognosis, 81 patients who participated in a guideline implementation study and whose treatment was found to adhere to available guidelines were selected. Using logistic regression analysis two models were constructed: one to predict treatment nonresponse; another to predict persistent functional impairments at the 1-year follow-up. Results: The final prediction model for treatment non-response contains only gender and secondary gain variables. It appears that: males have a higher likelihood (p=.074), and patients that report hopes of obtaining external benefits by seeking treatment have a lower likelihood (p=.054) of showing treatment non-response at the 1-year follow-up. The discriminatory power of this model was found to be poor, however. The model for persistent functional impairments includes gender, satisfaction with the accessibility of healthcare services and the presence of a comorbid anxiety disorder. It appears that: males (p=.87) and patients who express dissatisfaction with the accessibility of care (p=.008) have a higher likelihood, and that; patients who suffer from an additional comorbid anxiety disorder have a lower likelihood (p=.079) of persistent functional impairments. The discriminatory power of this model is excellent. Conclusion: It remains difficult to predict which anxiety disorder patients will not benefit from treatment that is tailored according to available practice guideline recommendations, therefore no one should be prevented from being offered such treatment, if one removes barriers in attending treatment.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent years have seen the large-scale development of clinical practice guidelines for mental healthcare. By promoting evidence-based practices these guidelines are expected to improve the quality of care. However, few studies have been conducted on the actual effectiveness of implementing such guidelines, and the scarce available scientific evidence is actually unequivocal. In this Doctoral thesis, Maarten van Dijk investigates the applicability and effectiveness of the Dutch multidisciplinary guidelines for anxiety disorders in every day clinical practice. By using observational data obtained from routine clinical practice, in four subsequent sub studies evidence was found, that suggests: 1) That the implementation of guidelines for the treatment of anxiety disorders in specialized mental health care is feasible; 2) That adhering to such guidelines actually has added value for clinical practise; 3) That systematic implementation of the anxiety treatment guidelines can improve treatment outcome and possibly also the efficiency of healthcare, and; 4) that at this point there is little reason to deny such treatment to someone with an anxiety disorder as a primary diagnosis, since no reliable predictors variables for treatment non-response could be identified. Together these findings suggest that the systematic implementation of available practice guidelines for anxiety disorders may improve quality of care, and therefore should encourage more widespread initiatives aimed at the systematic implementation of these guidelines in mental health care.
    11/2014; CCD Uitgevers., ISBN: 978-94-92096-00-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: De laatste jaren zijn er op grote schaal behandelrichtlijnen ontwikkeld voor de Geestelijke Gezondheidszorg (GGZ). Omdat deze richtlijnen het gebruik van bewezen-effectieve behandelingen aanmoedigen, is de verwachting dat dergelijke richtlijnen helpen om de kwaliteit van zorg te verbeteren. Er zijn tot op heden echter weinig studies uitgevoerd, naar de effectiviteit van de implementatie van dergelijke richtlijnen en het schaars beschikbare wetenschappelijke bewijs is hierover niet eenduidig. Maarten van Dijk onderzocht in zijn promotieonderzoek de toepasbaarheid en effectiviteit van de Nederlandse Multidisciplinaire Richtlijn Angststoornissen. Dit artikel vormt daarbij een samenvatting van dit onderzoek Met gebruikmaking van observationele data verzameld binnen de reguliere klinische praktijk, werd in 4 studies bewijs gevonden voor het feit dat: 1) Het mogelijk is de multidisciplinaire richtlijn voor angststoornissen te implementeren binnen de GGZ; 2) Het naleven van deze richtlijn meerwaarde heeft voor de klinische praktijk; 3) Systematische implementatie van deze richtlijn de behandeluitkomsten en mogelijk ook de efficiëntie van zorg kan vergroten en; 4) Er op dit moment weinig reden is om iemand met een angststoornis als primaire diagnose, een behandeling volgens deze richtlijn te onthouden. Dit omdat er geen betrouwbare voorspellers geïdentificeerd konden worden, om vooraf vast te kunnen stellen dat iemand waarschijnlijk niet op een behandeling volgens deze richtlijn zal reageren. Samen geven deze bevindingen aanwijzingen dat de systematische implementatie van de Multidisciplinaire Richtlijn Angststoornissen de kwaliteit van zorg zou kunnen verbeteren, hetgeen het opstarten van meer wijdverspreide initiatieven gericht op implementatie van deze richtlijn, zou moeten aanmoedigen.