On Discounting of Health Gains from Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Effects of Different Approaches

Department of Medical Microbiology, Molecular Virology Section, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Value in Health (Impact Factor: 3.28). 05/2012; 15(3):562-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.005
Source: PubMed


Discounting has long been a matter of controversy in the field of health economic evaluations. How to weigh future health effects has resulted in ongoing discussions. These discussions are imminently relevant for health care interventions with current costs but future benefits. Different approaches to discount health effects have been proposed. In this study, we estimated the impact of different approaches for discounting health benefits of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination.
An HPV model was used to estimate the impact of different discounting approaches on the present value of health effects. For the constant discount approaches, we varied the discount rate for health effects ranging from 0% to 4%. Next, the impact of relevant alternative discounting approaches was estimated, including hyperbolic, proportional, stepwise, and time-shifted discounting.
The present value of health effects gained through HPV vaccination varied strongly when varying discount rates and approaches. The application of the current Dutch guidelines resulted in a present value of health effects that was eight or two times higher than that produced when using the proportional discounting approach or when using the internationally more common 4% discount rate for health effects, respectively. Obviously, such differences translate into large variations in corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
The exact discount rate and approach chosen in an economic evaluation importantly impact the projected value of health benefits of HPV vaccination. Investigating alternative discounting approaches in health-economic analysis is important, especially for vaccination programs yielding health effects far into the future. Our study underlines the relevance of ongoing discussions on how and at what rates to discount.

Download full-text


Available from: Toos Daemen, Oct 09, 2015
26 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite childhood vaccination programs, pertussis remains endemic. To reduce the burden of pertussis, various extended pertussis vaccination strategies have been suggested. The aim of this article is to evaluate dynamic models used to assess the cost-effectiveness of vaccination. In total, 16 studies using a dynamic model were included, of which four also studied the cost-effectiveness of extended pertussis vaccination strategies. Generally, adolescent vaccination was found to be cost effective, but not highly effective in protecting infants too young to be vaccinated. The models also predicted that owing to age shifts, reduced pertussis disease in adolescents and young adults comes with an increase in later stages of life. This underpins the use of dynamic transmission models for interventions directed against pertussis. In future, dynamic transmission models for pertussis should be used widely to further enhance understanding of pertussis epidemiology and of extended pertussis vaccination programs that are currently considered in various countries.
    Expert Review of Vaccines 12/2012; 11(12):1415-28. DOI:10.1586/erv.12.130 · 4.21 Impact Factor
  • Vaccine 12/2012; 31(16). DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.082 · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Performing a total health economic analysis of a vaccine newly introduced into the market today is a challenge when using the conventional cost-effectiveness analysis we normally apply on pharmaceutical products. There are many reasons for that, such as: the uncertainty in the total benefit (direct and indirect) to be measured in a population when using a cohort model; (1) appropriate rules about discounting the long-term impact of vaccines are absent jeopardizing therefore their value at the initial investment; (2) the presence of opposite contexts when introducing the vaccine in developed vs. the developing world with high benefits, low initial health care investment for the latter vs. marginal benefit and high cost for the former; with a corresponding paradox for the vaccine becoming very cost-effective in low income countries but rather medium in middle low to high middle income countries; (3) and the type of trial assessment for the newer vaccines is now often performed with immunogenicity reaction instead of clinical endpoints which still leaves questions on their real impact and their head-to-head comparison. (4.)
    Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 01/2013; 9(5). DOI:10.4161/hv.23447 · 2.37 Impact Factor
Show more