Influence of laminar airflow on prosthetic joint infections: A systematic review

Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
The Journal of hospital infection (Impact Factor: 2.54). 05/2012; 81(2):73-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.04.008
Source: PubMed


Many hospitals use ultraclean ventilation (UVC), also known as laminar airflow systems (LAF), in their operating rooms to decrease rates of surgical site infections (SSIs). However, the evidence for these systems is limited and the additional expenses for LAF are substantial.
To determine the effectiveness of LAF to decrease SSI rates following hip and knee prosthesis.
Systematic review of cohort studies investigating the influence of LAF on SSIs following hip and knee prosthesis published during the last 10 years.
Four cohort studies using the endpoint severe SSI following knee prosthesis and four studies following hip prosthesis were included. No individual study showed a significant benefit for LAF following knee prosthesis but one small study showed a significant benefit following hip prosthesis. However, one individual study showed significantly higher severe SSI rates following knee prosthesis and three studies significantly higher SSI rates following hip prosthesis under LAF conditions. The summary odds ratio was 1.36 (95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.74) for knee prosthesis and 1.71 (1.21-2.41) for hip prosthesis.
It would be a waste of resources to establish new operating rooms with LAF, and questionable as to whether LAF systems in existing operating rooms should be replaced by conventional ventilation systems.


Available from: Christian Brandt, Sep 04, 2014
  • Source
    • "An extensive multicenter study was conducted which showed no benefit to ultraviolet light use [114]. Laminar-flow air-handling systems have been used, but only have testimonial evidence to support their use even in clean operations [115]. Restricting traffic in and out of the operating room reduces the generation of air currents which may well reduce air-borne bacteria from the floor [116]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Infections at the surgical site continue to occur in as many as 20% of elective colon resection cases. Methods to reduce these infections are inconsistently applied. Surgical site infection (SSI) is the result of multiple interactive variables including the inoculum of bacteria that contaminate the site, the virulence of the contaminating microbes, and the local environment at the surgical site. These variables that promote infection are potentially offset by the effectiveness of the host defense. Reduction in the inoculum of bacteria is achieved by appropriate surgical site preparation, systemic preventive antibiotics, and use of mechanical bowel preparation in conjunction with the oral antibiotic bowel preparation. Intraoperative reduction of hematoma, necrotic tissue, foreign bodies, and tissue dead space will reduce infections. Enhancement of the host may be achieved by perioperative supplemental oxygenation, maintenance of normothermia, and glycemic control. These methods require additional research to identify optimum application. Uniform application of currently understood methods and continued research into new methods to reduce microbial contamination and enhancement of host responsiveness can lead to better outcomes.
    12/2013; 2013(10):896297. DOI:10.1155/2013/896297
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hintergrund Das ambulante Operieren darf für den Patienten nicht mit einem höheren Infektionsrisiko verbunden sein als operative Eingriffe im Rahmen einer stationären Behandlung im Krankenhaus. Es gelten die gleichen Hygieneanforderungen wie bei stationären Operationen. Ziel des Beitrags Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die gesetzlichen Grundlagen und die fachlichen Anforderungen an die Hygiene beim ambulanten Operieren vorgestellt, und es wird auf Probleme hingewiesen, die bei den infektionshygienischen Begehungen des Gesundheitsamts in Frankfurt am Main festgestellt wurden. Ergebnisse Da in den Praxen zumeist als Eingriffe eingestufte Operationen vorgenommen wurden, waren die geringeren Anforderungen an die räumliche Ausstattung zugrunde zu legen, die – abgesehen von oft erheblicher Enge – zumeist erfüllt waren. Die häufigsten Probleme betrafen die Ausstattung des Händewaschplatzes (Waschbecken mit Überlauf und Wasserauslauf direkt in den Abfluss gerichtet; fehlende Spender für Seife, Händedesinfektionsmittel und Handtücher) und die Aufbereitung der Instrumente (Medizinprodukte). In keiner Einrichtung waren die Anforderungen der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und des Medizinprodukterechts erfüllt. Resümee Zum Abschluss des Beitrags werden praktische Tipps zur Umsetzung der erforderlichen Hygienevorgaben gegeben.
    Trauma und Berufskrankheit 10/2013; 15(S2). DOI:10.1007/s10039-013-1936-7

  • The Journal of hospital infection 05/2012; 81(2):71-2. DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2012.03.007 · 2.54 Impact Factor
Show more