Why should I talk about emotion? Communication patterns associated with physician discussion of patient expressions of negative emotion in hospital admission encounters

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
Patient Education and Counseling (Impact Factor: 2.2). 05/2012; 89(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.04.005
Source: PubMed


To describe hospital-based physicians' responses to patients' verbal expressions of negative emotion and identify patterns of further communication associated with different responses.
Qualitative analysis of physician-patient admission encounters audio-recorded between August 2008 and March 2009 at two hospitals within a university system. A codebook was iteratively developed to identify patients' verbal expressions of negative emotion. We categorized physicians' responses by their immediate effect on further discussion of emotion - focused away (away), focused neither toward nor away (neutral), and focused toward (toward) - and examined further communication patterns following each response type.
In 79 patients' encounters with 27 physicians, the median expression of negative emotion was 1, range 0-14. Physician responses were 25% away, 43% neutral, and 32% toward. Neutral and toward responses elicited patient perspectives, concerns, social and spiritual issues, and goals for care. Toward responses demonstrated physicians' support, contributing to physician-patient alignment and agreement about treatment.
Responding to expressions of negative emotion neutrally or with statements that focus toward emotion elicits clinically relevant information and is associated with positive physician-patient relationship and care outcomes.
Providers should respond to expressions of negative emotion with statements that allow for or explicitly encourage further discussion of emotion.

Full-text preview

Available from:

  • Patient Education and Counseling 10/2012; 89(1):1-2. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.001 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: It was hypothesized that parents exposed to a communication skills intervention would participate (e.g., ask questions, express concerns) in a pre-surgical consultation more than parents in the control group. METHODS: Sixty-five parents of prospective pediatric surgery patients were randomly assigned to either a communication skills intervention (booklet mailed prior to the consultation) or control group. Only initial consultation parents were included, no follow-ups. Audio-recordings of the medical consultations were obtained and the transcripts analyzed utilizing a content-coding system to determine patient participation. Also, parents were given a health literacy test (s-TOFHLA) and a post-interview questionnaire to gather demographic data. RESULTS: Intervention parents participated overall significantly more than control parents. Follow-up analyses revealed that intervention parents asked significantly more questions, and engaged in significantly more information verifying and expressing of concerns. There were no significant differences for parents' assertive statements or information provision. Other significant predictors of parents' participation were consultation length and parents' income. CONCLUSION: The intervention tested in this study promoted parents' participation in a pre-surgical consultation. As such, it has the potential to improve information exchange between parents and physicians with positive implications for informed consent. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providing parents with communication guidelines prior to a surgical consultation may improve physician-patient communication.
    Patient Education and Counseling 04/2013; 93(1). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.015 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Bipolar 1 disorder (BD1) has been associated with impaired set shifting, increased risk taking, and impaired integrity of frontolimbic white matter. However, it remains unknown to what extent these findings are related to each other and whether these abnormalities represent risk factors or consequences of the illness. Methods: We addressed the first question by comparing 19 patients with BD1 and 19 healthy control subjects (sample 1) with diffusion tensor imaging, the Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift Task, and the Cambridge Gambling Task. The second question we approached by applying the same protocol to 22 healthy first-degree relatives of patients with BD1 and 22 persons without a family history of mental disorders (sample 2). Results: In comparison with their control groups, BD1 patients and healthy first-degree relatives of patients with BD1 showed significantly reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) in the right anterior limb of the internal capsule and right uncinate fasciculus. White matter integrity in corpus callosum was reduced in BD1 patients only. In addition, reduced FA in anterior limb of the internal capsule correlated significantly with an increased number of errors during set shifting and increased risk taking and reduced FA in uncinate fasciculus correlated significantly with increased risk taking. Conclusions: Similar white matter alterations in BD1 patients and healthy relatives of BD1 patients are associated with comparable behavioral abnormalities. Further, results indicate that altered frontolimbic and frontothalamic connectivity and corresponding behavioral abnormalities might be a trait and vulnerability marker of BD1, whereas interhemispheric connectivity appears to be a disease marker.
    Biological psychiatry 05/2013; 74(12). DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.04.010 · 10.26 Impact Factor
Show more