On interval and point estimators based on a penalization of the modified profile likelihood

Statistics [?] Probability Letters (Impact Factor: 0.6). 07/2012; 82:1285-1289. DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2012.03.025


In the presence of a nuisance parameter, one widely shared approach to likelihood inference on a scalar parameter of interest is based on the profile likelihood and its various modifications. In this paper, we add a penalization to the modified profile likelihood, which is based on a suitable matching prior, and we discuss the frequency properties of interval estimators and point estimators based on this penalized modified profile likelihood. Two simulation studies are illustrated, and we indicate the improvement of the proposed penalized modified profile likelihood over its counterparts.

1 Read
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For the purpose of making inferences for a one-dimensional interest parameter, or constructing approximate complementary ancillaries or residuals, the directed likelihood or signed square root of the likelihood ratio statistic can be adjusted so that the resulting modified directed likelihood is under ordinary repeated sampling approximately standard normal with error of O ( n −3/2), conditional on a suitable ancillary statistic and hence unconditionally. In general, suitable specification of the ancillary statistic may be difficult. We introduce two adjusted directed likelihoods which are similar to the modified directed likelihood but do not require the specification of the ancillary statistic. The error of the standard normal approximation to the distribution of these new adjusted directed likelihoods is O ( n −1), conditional on any reasonable ancillary statistic, which is still an improvement over the unadjusted directed likelihoods.
    Biometrika 08/1994; 81(3). DOI:10.1093/biomet/81.3.485 · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For models characterized by a scalar parameter, it is well known that Jeffrey's prior ensures approximate frequentist validity of posterior quantiles. We examine how far this result remains robust in the presence of nuisance parameters, when the interest parameter θ1 is scalar, a prior on θ1 alone is considered, and the analysis is based on an adjusted version of the profile likelihood, rather than the true likelihood. This provides justification, from a Bayesian viewpoint, for some popular adjustments in term of their ability to neutralize unknown nuisance parameters. The dual problem of identifying adjustments that make a given prior on θ1 probability matching in the above sense is also addressed.
    Statistics [?] Probability Letters 04/2006; 76(8-76):838-842. DOI:10.1016/j.spl.2005.10.015 · 0.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Methodological 01/1987; 49.
Show more

Similar Publications