Article
Informal politics and inequity of access to health care in Lebanon.
Program in Health Care Financing, Harvard School of Public Health, 124 Mount Auburn Street, Suite 410, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
International Journal for Equity in Health (impact factor:
1.71).
05/2012;
11:23.
DOI:10.1186/1475-9276-11-23
Source: PubMed
- Citations (8)
-
Cited In (0)
-
Article: Social differentials in the decline of infant mortality in Sweden in the twentieth century: the impact of politics and policy.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This article describes some of the policies behind the decline of infant mortality in Sweden during the 20th century, from very high levels and large social differentials at the turn of the 19th century to one of the lowest levels in the world by 1950. Political commitment to reducing infant mortality and disparities between groups, a more equitable distribution of economic resources, and a successful combination of universal social and health policies most benefiting the least advantaged families and their children contributed to this favorable development.International Journal of Health Services 02/2003; 33(4):723-41; discussion 743-9. · 1.21 Impact Factor -
Article: Do welfare regimes mediate the effect of socioeconomic position on health in adolescence? A Cross-national comparison in Europe, North America, and Israel.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This article examines whether different types of welfare states mediate the effect of socioeconomic position on adolescents' health. The authors' main hypothesis is that countries with stronger redistributive policies will be more effective in weakening the association between socioeconomic position and health, thus reducing health inequalities. Analyses were carried out for Israel and 32 countries of Europe and North America. Data in the 2001-2002 Health Behavior in School-aged Children survey were collected through self-administered questionnaires distributed in schools to boys and girls 11, 13, and 15 years old. Socioeconomic position was measured with the Family Affluence Scale, based on reported consumption in the family. Health indicators were perceived health, general well-being, symptom load, and health behaviors. Social welfare regimes were classified using an expanded Esping-Andersen classification. The analysis supports the authors' hypothesis, at least partially. Social democratic and conservative welfare regimes rank lowest in the strength of association between low socioeconomic position and poor health, followed by liberal and other regime types, but it is more difficult to interpret data from Mediterranean and post-communist countries.International Journal of Health Services 02/2006; 36(2):309-29. · 1.21 Impact Factor -
Article: Differences in self reported morbidity by educational level: a comparison of 11 western European countries.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To assess whether there are variations between 11 Western European countries with respect to the size of differences in self reported morbidity between people with high and low educational levels. National representative data on morbidity by educational level were obtained from health interview surveys, level of living surveys or other similar surveys carried out between 1985 and 1993. Four morbidity indicators were included and a considerable effort was made to maximise the comparability of these indicators. A standardised scheme of educational levels was applied to each survey. The study included men and women aged 25 to 69 years. The size of morbidity differences was measured by means of the regression based Relative Index of Inequality. The size of inequalities in health was found to vary between countries. In general, there was a tendency for inequalities to be relatively large in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark and to be relatively small in Spain, Switzerland, and West Germany. Intermediate positions were observed for Finland, Great Britain, France, and Italy. The position of the Netherlands strongly varied according to sex: relatively large inequalities were found for men whereas relatively small inequalities were found for women. The relative position of some countries, for example, West Germany, varied according to the morbidity indicator. Because of a number of unresolved problems with the precision and the international comparability of the data, the margins of uncertainty for the inequality estimates are somewhat wide. However, these problems are unlikely to explain the overall pattern. It is remarkable that health inequalities are not necessarily smaller in countries with more egalitarian policies such as the Netherlands and the Scandinavian countries. Possible explanations are discussed.Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 05/1998; 52(4):219-27. · 3.19 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
causal impact
detrimental effects
formal macro-political institutions
health aid
health care
health care access
health disparities
health services
higher political activism
highest political activity
micro-level political institutions
political activism
political parties
provides access
qualitative interviews
religious commitment
reward political support
socioeconomic status
universal health care system
welfare state