This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted
PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon.
On the complexity of miRNA-mediated regulation in plants: novel insights into
the genomic organization of plant miRNAs
Biology Direct 2012, 7:15 doi:10.1186/1745-6150-7-15
Moreno Colaiacovo (email@example.com)
Antonella Lamontanara (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Letizia Bernardo (email@example.com)
Renzo Alberici (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Cristina Crosatti (email@example.com)
Lorenzo Giusti (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Luigi Cattivelli (email@example.com)
Primetta Faccioli (firstname.lastname@example.org)
2 February 2012
8 May 2012
8 May 2012
This peer-reviewed article was published immediately upon acceptance. It can be downloaded,
printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below).
Articles in Biology Direct are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central.
For information about publishing your research in Biology Direct or any BioMed Central journal, go to
For information about other BioMed Central publications go to
© 2012 Colaiacovo et al. ; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
On the complexity of miRNA-mediated regulation in
plants: novel insights into the genomic organization
of plant miRNAs
* Corresponding author
1 CRA-Genomics Research Centre, Agricultural Research Council, via S.Protaso
302, Fiorenzuola d’Arda, PC, Italy
† Equal contributors.
Reviewers: This article was reviewed by Dr Alexander Max Burroughs (nominated by Dr L
Aravind) and Dr Raya Khanin (nominated by Arcady Mushegian).
Open peer review
Reviewed by Dr Alexander Max Burroughs (nominated by Dr L Aravind) and Dr Raya
Khanin (nominated by Arcady Mushegian). For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers’
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous small non-coding RNAs of about 20–24 nt, known to
play key roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation, that can be coded either by intergenic
or intragenic loci. Intragenic (exonic and intronic) miRNAs can exert a role in the
transcriptional regulation and RNA processing of their host gene. Moreover, the possibility
that the biogenesis of exonic miRNAs could destabilize the corresponding protein-coding
transcript and reduce protein synthesis makes their characterization very intriguing and
suggests a possible novel mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression.
This work was designed to carry out the computational identification of putative exonic
miRNAs in 30 plant species and the analysis of possible mechanisms involved in their
The results obtained represent a useful starting point for future studies on the complex
networks involved in microRNA-mediated gene regulation in plants.
Gene regulation, Exonic miRNA, miRNA self regulation, Plants
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous small non-coding RNAs of about 20–24 nt that can
be coded either by intergenic or intragenic loci.
In plants a few examples of intronic miRNAs have been found in Arabidopsis and rice. In
Arabidopsis, miR402 has been identified within the intron of gene At1g77230 in the same
orientation as the hosting pre-mRNA . A putative mirtron, miR1429.2, has also been
identified in rice by Zhu et al.  as part of a homeobox gene. In Arabidopsis the intronic
miR838 is particularly interesting being located in the intron of Dicer-like 1 (Dcl1) gene
(which codes the key enzyme involved in plant miRNA maturation,), and thus enabling a
self-regulatory mechanism that helps maintain DCL1 homeostasis .
The rice miR3981 was detected in the exon of a putative glyoxalase gene and its biogenesis
pathway might be involved in the regulation of glyoxalase expression. Excessive levels of
glyoxalase mRNA should lead to an increase in pre-miR3981 processing by the enzyme
DCL1 and with glyoxalase also being a putative target for miR3981, an increase in the
amount of miRNA3981 could lead to a decrease in glyoxalase mRNA levels, thus preventing
durable high expression of the gene . This suggests the possibility of a balanced
competition, mediated by DCL1, between glyoxalase protein production and miR3981
biogenesis leading to a fine-tuning of glyoxalase expression in rice. The possibility that the
biogenesis of exonic miRNAs destabilizes the corresponding protein-coding transcript and
reduces protein synthesis makes their characterization very intriguing and suggests a new
mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression.
This work was designed to carry out the computational identification of putative exonic
miRNAs in plants by taking advantage of the huge amount of ESTs available for many
species. The analysis of putative miRNA target sites in the host mRNA was also performed in
order to gain some insight into possible novel mechanisms of gene regulation.
TCs (Tentative Consensus), from 30 plant species, publicly available from the DFCI Gene
Index Project (http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/), were computationally screened for the
presence of miRNA precursors and miRNA target sites (detailed methods can be found as
additional file). TCs hosting miRNA precursors are reported in Additional file 1. Some of the
annotated TCs refer both to a miRNA and a protein and thus represent the starting point for
the identification of candidate exonic miRNAs.
The relationships between miRNAs and transcription factors (TFs) is particularly relevant,
being the basis of complex regulatory networks [6,7] and several examples of TF genes
hosting microRNA precursor sequence were found and are reported in Additional file 1:
examples include AP-2, NAC and SPL coding genes. Interestingly, in some of the miRNA-
containing TCs identified in this study, the miRNA host gene is also its conserved target, for
example miR444, a monocot-specific miRNA identified in several monocots (barley, maize,
purple false brome, rice, wheat), is part of TCs coding for MADS-box transcription factors
(Additional file 1) and this family of transcription factors is also a well-known conserved
target for miR444. Additional file 2 contains the example of the barley EST called
GH228935 [GenBank: GH228935], which is a MADS-box-related sequence containing both
the target site for miR444b (+/−) and the precursor sequence for miR444a (+/+).
All TCs or singletons that include both a miRNA precursor sequence and one or more
miRNA target sites are presented in Table 1. TCs that include both a miRNA target site with
+/− orientation and the miRNA precursor sequence with +/+ orientation on the coding strand
can be referred to those cases where the miRNA is oriented on the same strand of the target
gene. The presence of the target sequence upstream or downstream of the precursor sequence
could affect both host gene post-transcriptional regulation as well as miRNA regulation or
self-regulation in the case that the target site belongs to the same miRNA family as the
miRNA precursor. The latter mechanism could be a further buffering system for modulation
of miRNA expression and could be in accordance with the model of miRNA self-regulation
proposed by Meng et al. [6,7] that suggests a feedback model in which the miRNA* binds to
the complementary sites on their precursor thus exerting a cleavage-based modulating role.
Examples of putative self-regulation based on the presence of a target site upstream or
downstream of the precursor have been found in our data for miR444 as reported above,
miR395 (rice), miR159/319 (soybean), miR1118 (wheat) and miR1219 (moss).
Table 1 Reports those TCs or singletons that include both a miRNA precursor sequence and one or more miRNA target sites
Species name Scientific name Sequence identifier Annotation from DFCI Gene
miRNA family Target site (+/-) Precursor site
TC360779 pentatricopeptide (PPR) repeat-5652
TC383702 89-166 (+/-)
GH228935 MIKC-type MADS-box
transcription factor WM32A
TC273521 Uncharacterized protein
TC498468 Transcriptional regulator, TetR
NP13127877 263-414 (+/-)
NP7254391 467-760 (+/+)
TC19973 RNA polymerase II largest
TC24438 Predicted protein 1062
TC27593 Ribulose bisphosphate
carboxylase small chain
CB677501 Os05g0439200 protein 156/157
EG709456 Conserved protein 109-285 (+/+)
CA760441 373-441 (+/-)
164-291 (+/+) Soybean
BW657280 Transcriptional regulator, MarR
Chromosome chr14 scaffold_190,
whole genome shotgun sequence
TC428562 Transcriptional regulator, MarR
MATE efflux family protein
EX343185 281-358 (+/+)
EX369017 217-294 (+/+)
Triticum aestivum TC369361
835-974 (+/+) TC370181
On the other hand, those TCs where the orientation of miRNA precursor sequence with
respect to coding strand is +/− should refer to those miRNAs coded in the antisense
orientation with respect to the host gene. Antisense transcription associated with miRNA
target mRNAs have been previously discovered in Arabidopsis  and may serve as a link
between miRNA and RNA silencing pathways, suggesting that miRNAs may have additional
roles in post-transcriptional regulation that are independent of cleavage.
TCs or singletons coding for more than one miRNA precursor (miRNA clusters) have also
been identified both in the +/+ and +/− orientations (sense/antisense miRNAs) and are
summarized in Additional file 3. The occurrence of pairs of antisense miRNAs in plants has
been previously reported . Most of the miRNA clusters highlighted in plants contain
several members of a specific miRNA family rather than encoding miRNA with unrelated
sequences, as is frequently the case for animal miRNA clusters . Examples of plant
miRNA clusters with members of different families are reported in Additional file 3.
Among the exonic miRNAs identified, we chose to explore, as an interesting example, the
relationship between miR1118 and calmodulin-coding genes in wheat (Table 1). Calmodulin
genes are of particular interest due to the fundamental role of calmodulin in the calcium-
dependent regulation during plant response to endogenous and exogenous stimuli .
Calmodulin-binding proteins have already been shown to be targeted by miRNAs in plants
, while no report is available on miRNA targeting to calmodulin itself.
Many plant species possess calmodulin (CaM) multigene families composed of several
genes: some of which encode identical proteins, while others encode different isoforms of
calmodulin-related proteins. In wheat, at least 13 CaM-related genes have been identified and
classified into four subfamilies (SF-1:4 on the basis of their nucleotide sequence) coding for
three distinct isoforms named TaCaM-I, TaCaM-II and TaCaM-III . Genes from SF-1,
SF-3 and SF-4 encode for the same isoform (TaCaM-I, the most similar to calmodulin from
other plant species and organisms), while SF-2, the most divergent calmodulin subfamily
with most recent origin in wheat, encodes at least two isoforms (TaCaM-II and TaCaM-III).
To deeply characterize the calmodulin gene family for the presence of miRNA-coding
sequences, ten cDNA clones corresponding to 10 different genes encoding calmodulin-like
proteins were screened against the wheat miRNA mature sequences present in miRBase.
Each cDNA clone contained at least part of the 5′UTR, the full coding region, the 3′-UTR
and the polyA tail. Blast output is reported in Additional file 4. The most significant match
was found for tae-miR1118 mature sequence (score 43, e-value 2e-006), furthermore, an
additional miRNA (tae-miR1125 mature sequence) showed a very significant match (score
39; e-value 2e-005). Both miRNAs were found in the two genes belonging to SF-2 (TaCaM2-
1 and TaCaM2-2), but not in the third sequence belonging to the same subfamily (TaCaM2-
3). Mature sequences for both miRNAs are included in the 3′UTR regions of the two
calmodulin genes. Although the coding sequences of TaCaM2-1 and TaCaM2-2 are
substantially different and produce two distinguishable calmodulin isoforms (TaCaM-III and
TaCaM-II, respectively), the corresponding 3′UTR regions differ only by one nucleotide. The
nucleotide sequence alignment between the 3′ UTR regions of the three calmodulin genes
belonging to SF-2 revealed a striking difference between TaCaM2-3 and the other two genes:
TaCaM2-1 and TaCaM2-2 share a long insertion of 239 bp that is absent in TaCaM2-3
(Figure 1 and Additional file 5). A Blast search against the complete TREP database,
containing a collection of repetitive DNA sequences from different Triticeae species,
highlighted a strong match (score 315, e-value 1e-86) of the inserted sequence with a DNA
transposon of the Mariner class called DTT_Polyphemus_464G14-3. This finding is in
agreement with a possible model for the evolution of MIR genes that proposes their origin
from transposable elements, on the basis of the observation that the DNA-type
nonautonomous elements called MITE (miniature inverted-repeat transposable element) can
fold into imperfect stem loops that are typical of miRNA precursors . Several pieces of
evidence pointed to plant mariner-like elements (MLEs) as the autonomous partners of the
nonautonomous Stowaway MITEs .
Figure 1 Reports the positions of miR1118 and miR1125 coding sequences inside wheat
SF-2 calmodulin genes (TaCaM2-1, TaCaM2-2, TaCaM2-3)
The presence of the transposon-related insertion in calmodulin genes from other plant species
has was investigated, and a blast search using the sequence of TaCaM2-2 gene as query was
performed. The results are reported in Additional file 6: a significant match with the 3′UTR
region of the wheat gene was detected only with a barley gene, where, however, the
transposon-related sequence was absent.
Moreover, while the miR1125 precursor sequence deposited in the miRBase found a
significant match (81% identity) entirely included in the inserted sequence, the miR1118
precursors sequence matched (100% identity) only partially into the insertion while it
spanned also the very last part of the 3′UTR of the TaCaM genes (Figure 1). The reverse
complement sequence for miR1118 found inside the 239 nt insertion could thus represent a
target site for the same miRNA. This is very possible since only 3 mismatches were found
when compared with the mature sequence, and the target site is also predicted by
psRNAtarget. A second reverse complement site is also shared by all three SF-2 genes
(TaCaM2-1, TaCaM2-2 and TaCaM2-3), being located in the last part of the 3′ UTR region.
This site corresponds to the miRNA* of the precursor deposited in the miRBase and it can be
considered a less likely target site due to the high number of mismatches with the mature
sequence. However, the prediction of the RNA secondary structures by mFold software
(Additional file 7) highlighted the worse energetic stability of the miR1118 precursor stored
in miRBase compared to that of the inserted sequence (−32.5 kcal/mol vs.−117.6 kcal/mol).
Although the transposable element is longer than the deposited precursor (239 nt vs. 140 nt) it
has a Minimal Folding Energy Index (MFEI) higher than the miRNA precursor (1.16 vs.
0.59) and it is in better agreement with the values known for plant miRNAs. The existence of
two alternative miR1118 precursors could thus be possible. The inserted sequence has
acquired some mutations since the insertion event and these variations have led to a better
stability of the candidate miRNA precursor, thus confirming this hypothesis. In fact,
compared with the inserted sequence, the predicted secondary structure of the transposable
element stored in the TREP database shows a worse stability (−84.4 kcal/mol), a lower MFEI
(0.88) and a higher number of mismatches (4) between miRNA and miRNA*.
Recently Meng et al. [6,7] reported on the high dynamicity of the regulatory activities
mediated by miRNAs which are themselves strictly regulated, thus making the miRNA-
involved networks more robust.
The results presented in this work can be considered as a valuable support for future studies
on the complex networks involved in miRNA-mediated gene regulation in plants. In
particular the relationships between miRNAs and transcription factors (TFs) represent a key
node of these complex networks. Most of the currently available studies have been involved
in the identification of TF recognition sites in the promoter of miRNA genes and in the
identification of miRNA target sites in TF coding genes. The present work adds a novel level
of complexity pointing out the possibility that miRNA coding sequences can also be hosted
by TF genes.
Reviewer’s report 1
Dr Alexander Max Burroughs (nominated by Dr L Aravind)
The authors probe TCs and identify several miRNA precursors. What is missing from this
analysis is a sense of the novelty of the findings. How many of these precursors have
previously been predicted as being present at in the genome at the identified locations? For
reasonably well-annotated genomes like Arabidopsis or rice it should be relatively easy to
look at this to provide an overview of how many times novel locations are identified for
known miRNAs. If this count is large, it may be interesting to discuss why these have not
been identified in the past.
Author response: In order to clarify this aspect, we checked all the miRNA genomic
locations as they are reported in miRBase, and we compared them with the location of the
identified TCs. We performed the analysis only for Arabidopsis sequences, which are
supposed to be better annotated. Almost all pairs miRNA-TC show overlapping locations,
meaning that the two pieces of information were previously known to the scientific
community. However, the novelty of our work is that we merged these existing data and we
were able to extract novel findings which are relevant for the miRNA analysis, e.g. the
characterization of these miRNA precursors as exonic miRNAs.
As an additional form of evidence it might be useful, when available, to map deep-
sequencing data to the TCs in order to confirm the presence and active processing of the
identified precursors, particularly any identified in novel locations. In addition, one limitation
in the analysis is that it precludes detection of previously unidentified miRNA precursors, an
angle which could be addressed by feeding the deep-sequencing data mappings into a
miRNA prediction program (based on parameters like mature/star sequence count
distribution, folding properties, etc.) like miRanalyzer or miRdeep. This could increase the
number of transcripts potentially harboring exonic miRNA precursors.
Author response: Small RNA sequencing is an interesting further development for this work
and we plan to have new data in the near future which will be part of another publication. At
the moment we are in the process of sequencing small RNAs from several plant species, and
this will give us the opportunity to study also novel microRNAs.
I was struck by the general lack of conservation in the locations of the identified precursors:
few seemed to be located in homologous transcripts across different plant species. While the
authors discuss an example of conservation of the miR444 precursor, it might be informative
to give an overview of the general conservation/lack of conservation observed in the
localization of precursors in host transcripts. Are transcripts harboring both the precursor and
the miRNA target sequence more likely to be conserved? This could provide some general
insight into the mobility of the precursors and their role in “cis-regulation” of transcripts.
Author response: According to our analysis, there are few miRNA precursors which are
present in conserved transcripts across different species. Of all the miRNA families which
were identified in multiple species, approximately 20% show host conservation in at least two
species. The situation is similar if we consider transcripts harboring both the precursor and
the target site. A possible explanation for this finding could be the different level of
completeness of species-specific gene indices (e.g. accuracy of TC annotations).
The authors note “On the other hand, those TCs where the orientation of miRNA precursor
sequence with respect to coding strand is +/− should refer to those miRNAs coded in the
antisense orientation with respect to the host gene. Antisense transcription associated with
miRNA target mRNAs have been previously discovered in Arabidopsis and may serve as a
link between miRNA and RNA silencing pathways…” This is a very interesting observation
and quite consistent with a growing number of studies linking antisense transcription at gene
loci to RNAi pathways. It might be worthwhile to scan existing gene annotations for evidence
of downstream, noncoding antisense transcription which could overlap the gene body in +/−
cases; this could provide some global evidence in support of the statement.
Author response: We manually inspected all the +/− cases which we identified in
Arabidopsis (chosen for the same reasons reported above, i.e. the accuracy of genome
annotation), then exploring the TAIR genome browser and looking for evidences of antisense
transcription at those locations. We found evidence for antisense transcription in 38% of the
Outside of the analysis of the calmodulin transcripts, there was little discussion of the
predicted folding energies for the identified precursors. It could be instructive to see how
secondary structure stabilities in the identified precursor compare to other precursors in
individual genomes, foremost as a gauge of the reliability of the identified precursors,
particularly those precursors identified in novel locations (see first comment).
Author response: The criteria which we used for the prediction of miRNA precursors are
very stringent, since we selected as putative miRNAs only those sequences which have a
nucleotide identity greater than 95% with a known precursor. Because of this, we don’t
expect big changes in the energetic stability of the identified sequences compared to the ones
stored in miRBase. The variations are supposed to be minimal and should not affect
dramatically the miRNA stability. However, in order to confirm our expectation, we selected
some miRNAs at random and we compared their energy values to the corresponding
sequence stored in miRBase, by using the mFold software. The differences are small: ath-
MIR416 has a free energy equal to −27.9 kcal/mol if we consider the miRBase sequence, and
−31 kcal/mol if we consider our sequence; the same is true also for ath-MIR398b (−51.5 vs
−51.4), ath-MIR319b (−81.3 vs −80.4) and osa-MIR439d (−57.8 vs −60.8).
Reviewer’s report 2
Dr Raya Khanin (nominated by Arcady Mushegian)
Results are given as flat files. The paper would benefit from organizing the results in a
Author response: We are planning to set up a searchable database with all the relevant
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
PF conceived the idea and wrote the paper. MC and AL did most of the computational work
and were supported by LB. RA gave the informatics support. LC, CC, LG contributed to the
interpretation of the results and to the preparation of manuscript. All authors read and
approved the final manuscript.
We thank Keith Anthony Grimaldi for helping with the preparation of the manuscript. This
work has been supported by “Mappa 5A” and “Drupomics” projects (Italian Ministry for
1. Sunkar R, Zhu JK: Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs
from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16:2001–2019.
2. Zhu Q-H, Spriggs A, Matthew L, Fan L, Kennedy G, Gubler F, Helliwell C: A diverse set
of microRNAs and microRNA-like small RNAs in developing rice grains. Genome Res
3. Voinnet O: Origin, biogenesis and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell 2009,
4. Rajagopalan R, Vaucheret H, Treio J, Bartel DP: A diverse and evolutionary fluid set of
microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene Dev 2006, 20(24):3407–3425.
5. Li T, Li H, Zhang YX, Liu JY: Identification and analysis of seven H2O2-responsive
miRNAs and 32 new miRNAs in the seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp indica).
Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39(7):2821–2833.
6. Meng Y, Shao C, Wang H, Chen M: The regulatory activities of plant microRNAs: a
more dynamic perspective. Plant Physiol 2011, 157(4):1583–1595.
7. Meng Y, Shao C, Chen M: Toward microRNA-mediated gene regulatory networks in
plants. Brief Bioinform 2011, 12(6):645–659.
8. Luo QJ, Samanta MP, Köksal F, Janda J, Galbraith DW, Richardson CR, Ou-Yang F,
Rock CD: Evidence for antisense transcription associated with microRNA target
mRNAs in Arabidopsis. PLOS Genet 2009, 5(4):e1000457.
9. Zhang B, Pan X, Stellwag EJ: Identification of soybean microRNAs and their targets.
Planta 2008, 229(1):161–182.
10. Axtell MJ, Snyder JA, Bartel DP: Common functions for diverse smallRNAs of land
plants. Plant Cell 2007, 19(6):1750–1769.
11. Kim MC, Chung WS, Yun DJ, Cho MJ: Calcium and calmodulin-mediated regulation
of gene expression in plants. Mol Plant 2009, 2(1):13–21.
12. Manila TM, Riju A, Lakshmi Priya Darshini K, Chandrasekar A, Eapen SJ: In silico
microRNA identification from paprika (Capsicum annuum) ESTs. Nature Precedings
13. Yang T, Segal G, Abbo S, Feldman M, Fromm H: Characterization of the calmodulin
gene family in wheat: structure, chromosomal location and evolutionary aspects. Mol
Gen Genet 1996, 252(6):684–694.
14. Feschotte C, Swamy L, Wessler SR: Genome-wide analysis of mariner-like
transposable elements in rice reveals complex relationships with Stowaway Miniature
Inverted Repeat Transposable Elements (MITEs). Genetics 2003, 163(2):747–758.
15. Dai X, Zhao PX: psRNATarget: a Plant Small RNA Target Analysis Server. Nucleic
Acids Res 2011, Web Server Issue.
16. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S: miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and
deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:D152–D157.
17. Zuker M: Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction.
Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:3406–3415.
Additional_file_1 as XLS
Additional file 1 Reports the results of blasting each species-specific Gene Index against the
corresponding species-specific miRNA precursor sequences.
Additional_file_2 as DOC
Additional file 2 Reports barley EST named GH228935 which includes both the target site
for miR444b (+/−) and the precursor sequence for miR444a (+/+).
Additional_file_3 as DOC
Additional file 3 Reports TCs or singletons coding for more than one miRNA precursor
(miRNA clusters) both in the +/+ and +/− orientations (sense/antisense miRNAs).
Additional_file_4 as DOC
Additional file 4 Blast results for ten wheat cDNA clones (corresponding to 10 different
genes encoding calmodulin-like proteins) against the wheat miRNA mature sequences
present in miRBase.
Additional_file_5 as DOC
Additional file 5 Sequences of wheat SF-2 calmodulin genes (TaCaM2-1, TaCaM2-2,
TaCaM2-3). Precursors, mature and reverse complement sequences are reported for miR1118
Additional_file_6 as DOC
Additional file 6 Blast results related to the presence of the transposon-related insertion in
calmodulin genes from plant species other than wheat using the sequence of TaCaM2-2 gene
Additional_file_7 as DOC
Additional file 7 Reports the predicted secondary structures of the three miRNA precursors
putatively coded by the calmodulin mRNA: the miR1118 precursor identical to the one
present in miRBase, the miR1118 and miR1225 precursors putatively coded by the
Additional_file_8 as DOC
Additional file8 Reports detailed on the adopted computational methods [15-17].
m iR1118 target site
m iR1125 m ature sequence
m iR1125 passenger
m iR1118 m ature sequence
m iR1118 passenger