Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β (Aβ) as an effect biomarker for brain Aβ lowering verified by quantitative preclinical analyses.

MS#220-4546, Department of Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA.
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (Impact Factor: 3.89). 05/2012; 342(2):366-75. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.112.192625
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Reducing the generation of amyloid-β (Aβ) in the brain via inhibition of β-secretase or inhibition/modulation of γ-secretase has been pursued as a potential disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease. For the discovery and development of β-secretase inhibitors (BACEi), γ-secretase inhibitors (GSI), and γ-secretase modulators (GSM), Aβ in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been presumed to be an effect biomarker for Aβ lowering in the brain. However, this presumption is challenged by the lack of quantitative understanding of the relationship between brain and CSF Aβ lowering. In this study, we strived to elucidate how the intrinsic pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship for CSF Aβ lowering is related to that for brain Aβ through quantitative modeling of preclinical data for numerous BACEi, GSI, and GSM across multiple species. Our results indicate that the intrinsic PK/PD relationship in CSF is predictive of that in brain, at least in the postulated pharmacologically relevant range, with excellent consistency across mechanisms and species. As such, the validity of CSF Aβ as an effect biomarker for brain Aβ lowering is confirmed preclinically. Meanwhile, we have been able to reproduce the dose-dependent separation between brain and CSF effect profiles using simulations. We further discuss the implications of our findings to drug discovery and development with regard to preclinical PK/PD characterization and clinical prediction of Aβ lowering in the brain.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Deposition of β -amyloid (Aβ) peptides, cleavage products of β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β-secretase-1 (BACE1) and γ-secretase, is a neuropathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). γ-Secretase inhibition is a therapeutical anti-Aβ approach, although changes in the enzyme's activity in AD brain are unclear. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ peptides are thought to derive from brain parenchyma and thus may serve as biomarkers for assessing cerebral amyloidosis and anti-Aβ efficacy. The present study compared active γ-secretase binding sites with Aβ deposition in aged and AD human cerebrum, and explored the possibility of Aβ production and secretion by the choroid plexus (CP). The specific binding density of [(3) H]-L-685,458, a radiolabeled high-affinity γ-secretase inhibitor, in the temporal neocortex and hippocampal formation was similar for AD and control cases with similar ages and post-mortem delays. The CP in post-mortem samples exhibited exceptionally high [(3) H]-L-685,458 binding density, with the estimated maximal binding sites (Bmax) reduced in the AD relative to control groups. Surgically resected human CP exhibited APP, BACE1 and presenilin-1 immunoreactivity, and β-site APP cleavage enzymatic activity. In primary culture, human CP cells also expressed these amyloidogenic proteins and released Aβ40 and Aβ42 into the medium. Overall, our results suggest that γ-secretase activity appears unaltered in the cerebrum in AD and is not correlated with regional amyloid plaque pathology. The CP appears to be a previously unrecognised non-neuronal contributor to CSF Aβ, probably at reduced levels in AD.
    European Journal of Neuroscience 02/2013; · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: γ-Secretase is an aspartyl intramembranal protease composed of presenilin, Nicastrin, Aph1 and Pen2 with 19 transmembrane domains. γ-Secretase cleaves the amyloid precursor proteins (APP) to release Aβ peptides that likely play a causative role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). In addition, γ-secretase cleaves Notch and other type I membrane proteins. γ-Secretase inhibitors (GSIs) have been developed and used for clinical studies. However, clinical trials have shown adverse effects of GSIs that are potentially linked with non-discriminatory inhibition of Notch signaling, overall APP processing and possible other substrates. Therefore, these findings call for the development of disease modifying agents that target γ-secretase activity to lower Aβ42 production without blocking the overall processing of γ-secretase substrates. γ-Secretase modulators (GSMs) originally derived from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) display such characteristics and are the focus of this review. However, first generation GSMs have limited potential due to low potency and undesired neuropharmacokinetic properties. This generation of GSMs has been suggested to interact with APP substrate, γ-secretase or both. To improve the potency and brain availability, second generation GSMs including NSAID-derived carboxylic acid and non-NSAID-derived heterocyclic chemotypes as well as natural product-derived GSMs have been developed. Animal studies of this generation of GSMs have shown encouraging preclinical profiles. Moreover, using potent GSM photoaffinity probes, multiple studies unambiguously have showed that both carboxylic acid and heterocyclic GSMs specifically target presenilin, the catalytic subunit of γ-secretase. In addition, two types of GSMs have distinct binding sites within the γ-secretase complex and exhibit different Aβ profiles. GSMs induce a conformational change of γ-secretase to achieve modulation. Various models are proposed and discussed. Despite the progress of GSM research, many outstanding issues remain to be investigated to achieve the ultimate goal of developing GSMs as effective AD therapies.
    Biochemistry 04/2013; · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modeling has been fully implemented at AstraZeneca's drug discovery unit for central nervous system and pain indications to facilitate timely progression of the right compound to clinical studies, simultaneously assuring essential preclinical efficacy and safety knowledge. This review illustrates the impact of a translational PKPD paradigm with examples from drug discovery programs. Paradoxically, laboratory animal use decreased owing to better understanding of in vitro-in vivo relationships, optimized in vivo study designs, meta-analyses and hypothesis testing using simulations. From an ethical and effectivity perspective, we advocate that translational PKPD approaches should be implemented more broadly in drug discovery.
    Drug discovery today 05/2013; · 6.63 Impact Factor


Available from
May 27, 2014