Suprathreshold asymmetries in human motion perception.

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Experimental Brain Research (Impact Factor: 2.17). 05/2012; 219(3):369-79. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3099-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Detection of asymmetries has been a mainstay of using vestibular reflexes to assess semicircular canal function. However, there has been relatively little work on how vestibular stimuli are perceived. Suprathreshold vestibular perception was measured in 13 normal healthy controls by having them compare the relative sizes of two yaw (vertical-axis rotation) or sway (right-left translation) stimuli. Both stimuli were 1.5 s in duration with a staircase used to adjust the relative size of the stimuli to find a pair of stimuli perceived as equal. Motion stimuli were delivered in darkness using a hexapod motion platform, and visual stimuli simulating motion were presented on a screen in the absence of platform motion. Both same direction (SD) and opposite direction (OD) stimuli were delivered in separate runs. After a two-interval stimulus, subjects reported which movement they perceived as larger. Cumulative distribution functions were fit to the responses so that the relative magnitudes of the two stimuli perceived as equal could be determined. For OD trial blocks, a directional asymmetry index was calculated to compare the relative size of perceived rightward and leftward motion. For all trial blocks, a temporal asymmetry index (TAI) was used to compare the relative size of the first and second intervals. Motion OD stimuli were perceived as equal in all subjects in yaw and all but one in sway. For visual OD stimuli, two subjects had slightly asymmetric responses for both sway and yaw. The TAI demonstrated asymmetry in 54% in yaw, in which the second interval was perceived to be larger in all but one subject who had an asymmetry. For sway, only two subjects had a significant asymmetry. Visual stimuli produced a similar rate of asymmetry. The direction and magnitude of these asymmetries were not significantly correlated with those seen for motion stimuli. Asymmetries were found in a fraction with the TAI in SD stimuli for motion in yaw (42%) and sway (33%), as well as for vision in yaw (60%) and sway (43%). The precision at discriminating SD motion stimuli decreased significantly with age, but there was no difference in OD motion or visual stimuli.

Download full-text


Available from: Benjamin Crane, Jul 01, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vestibular perceptual thresholds are defined by a dynamic sensory system. To capture these dynamics, thresholds were previously fit as a function of frequency. In this paper, we compare fits using two published models with two new models. Furthermore, a new fitting method that utilizes vestibular perceptual dynamics is developed to improve fit quality and overcome problems associated with the conventional approach. Combinations of the four models and two fitting methods are tested using both simulated data and previously published experimental data. Simulations reveal that the conventional approach underestimates thresholds when the number of trials at each frequency is limited (circa 50); this underestimation is reduced fivefold by the new fitting method that simultaneously utilizes data across frequencies. The new fitting method also scored best for goodness of fit for both the simulations and experimental data. In fact, the new approach of fitting simultaneously across frequencies proved more accurate, more precise, more robust, and more efficient than the conventional approach of fitting the responses at each frequency individually and then fitting these threshold data across frequency. The revised fit of published yaw rotation threshold data shows that these are best fit by a first-order high-pass filter having a plateau of 0.5°/s (roughly a factor of 4 higher than the motion platform vibration) at frequencies above the cutoff frequency of 0.26 Hz, which is well above the cutoff frequency of the semicircular canals (circa 0.03 Hz). This dynamic analysis suggests the contributions of a velocity leakage mechanism to human yaw rotation thresholds.
    Experimental Brain Research 08/2012; 222(3):303-20. DOI:10.1007/s00221-012-3217-2 · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A theme in sensory perception is that exposure to a stimulus causes perception of subsequent stimuli to be shifted in the opposite direction. Such phenomenon is known as aftereffect and has been extensively described in the visual system as well as recently described for the vestibular system during translation. It is known from aviation studies that after a maneuver in roll, pilots can experience a false perception of roll in the opposite direction. The magnitude and duration of this effect as well as the potential influence of the gravity vector have not previously been defined. In the current paper this roll aftereffect (RAE) is examined in response to whole-body roll about an earth-horizontal axis in eight healthy human subjects. The peak velocity of a 0.5-s-duration roll was varied based on previous responses to find the point where subjects perceived no motion. Without a preceding stimulus, the starting position (upright, 9° left, or 9° right) did not influence roll perception. The RAE was measured in a completely dark room using an adapting (first interval) stimulus consisting of 9° of roll over 1.5 s (peak velocity, 12°/s), delivered 0.5, 3, or 6 s prior to test (second interval) stimulus. A significant RAE was seen in all subjects. Half a second after the adapting stimulus, a test stimulus had to be on average 1.5 ± 0.4°/s in the opposite direction to be perceived as stationary. When the subject remained upright after the adapting stimulus, the RAE diminished with time, although it remained significantly larger at 3 and 6 s when the subject remained tilted after the adapting stimulus. These data demonstrate that roll perception can be influenced by small preceding stimuli and tilt causes a persistence of the RAE.
    Experimental Brain Research 09/2012; 223(1):89-98. DOI:10.1007/s00221-012-3243-0 · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prior studies show that visual motion perception is more precise than vestibular motion perception, but it is unclear whether this is universal or the result of specific experimental conditions. We compared visual and vestibular motion precision over a broad range of temporal frequencies by measuring thresholds for vestibular (subject motion in the dark), visual (visual scene motion) or visual-vestibular (subject motion in the light) stimuli. Specifically, thresholds were measured for motion frequencies spanning a two-decade physiologic range (0.05 Hz to 5 Hz) using single-cycle sinusoidal acceleration roll tilt trajectories (i.e. distinguishing left-side down from right-side down). We found that while visual and vestibular thresholds were broadly similar between 0.05 and 5.0 Hz, each cue is significantly more precise than the other at certain frequencies. Specifically, we found that: 1) visual and vestibular thresholds were indistinguishable at 0.05 Hz and 2 Hz (i.e. similarly precise), 2) visual thresholds were lower (i.e. vision more precise) than vestibular thresholds between 0.1 Hz and 1 Hz, and 3) visual thresholds were higher (i.e. vision less precise) than vestibular thresholds above 2 Hz. This shows that vestibular perception can be more precise than visual perception at physiologically relevant frequencies. We also found that sensory integration of visual and vestibular information is consistent with static Bayesian optimal integration of visual-vestibular cues. In contrast with most prior work that degraded or altered sensory cues, we demonstrated static optimal integration using natural cues.
    Journal of Neurophysiology 12/2013; 111(12). DOI:10.1152/jn.00332.2013 · 3.04 Impact Factor