Do Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) Make Counterproductive Choices Because They Are Sensitive to Human Ostensive Cues?

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 04/2012; 7(4):e35437. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035437
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Dogs appear to be sensitive to human ostensive communicative cues in a variety of situations, however there is still a measure of controversy as to the way in which these cues influence human-dog interactions. There is evidence for instance that dogs can be led into making evaluation errors in a quantity discrimination task, for example losing their preference for a larger food quantity if a human shows a preference for a smaller one, yet there is, so far, no explanation for this phenomenon. Using a modified version of this task, in the current study we investigated whether non-social, social or communicative cues (alone or in combination) cause dogs to go against their preference for the larger food quantity. Results show that dogs' evaluation errors are indeed caused by a social bias, but, somewhat contrary to previous studies, they highlight the potent effect of stimulus enhancement (handling the target) in influencing the dogs' response. A mild influence on the dog's behaviour was found only when different ostensive cues (and no handling of the target) were used in combination, suggesting their cumulative effect. The discussion addresses possible motives for discrepancies with previous studies suggesting that both the intentionality and the directionality of the action may be important in causing dogs' social biases.


Available from: Emanuela Prato Previde, Jun 12, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Various studies have assessed the role of life experiences, including learning opportunities, living conditions and the quality of dog-human relationships, in the use of human cues and problem-solving ability. The current study investigates how and to what extent training affects the behaviour of dogs and the communication of dogs with humans by comparing dogs trained for a water rescue service and untrained pet dogs in the impossible task paradigm. Twenty-three certified water rescue dogs (the water rescue group) and 17 dogs with no training experience (the untrained group) were tested using a modified version of the impossible task described by Marshall-Pescini et al. in 2009. The results demonstrated that the water rescue dogs directed their first gaze significantly more often towards the owner and spent more time gazing toward two people compared to the untrained pet dogs. There was no difference between the dogs of the two groups as far as in the amount of time spent gazing at the owner or the stranger; neither in the interaction with the apparatus attempting to obtain food. The specific training regime, aimed at promoting cooperation during the performance of water rescue, could account for the longer gazing behaviour shown toward people by the water rescue dogs and the priority of gazing toward the owner.
    Behavioural Processes 09/2014; 110. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.022 · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inter-individually different but intra-individually consistent behaviour in similar situations cannot always be explained by physiological states or environmental factors; hence, these differences may reveal the strategy an individual employs to act with and react to environmental stimuli. This is described as personality and is thought to be innate and consistent over time and across situations. The aim of this thesis was to assess the personality of young cattle (Bos taurus) to gain more knowledge on the phenotype of this economically important livestock species by combining ethological observations, physiological measures, and objectively measured applied physical force. The thesis was divided into three studies. In Study I, an appliance was to be established that allows to objectively measuring escape behaviour and reluctance in young cattle restrained by being tethered on a halter, independently of the impact and rating of a more or less subjective observer or handler. While restrained, a tractive force-time diagram was recorded and later analysed. To evaluate, 24 three-month-old calves were restrained by being tethered for 30 min on a halter connected to a force transducer. Most of the calves showed a similar behaviour pattern with a slight decrease in effort across the 30 min test. Still, several animals showed clearly higher values in the parameters. Thus, two clusters of calves were found, which did not differ in weight of the animals. To phenotype personality, behaviour and simultaneously measured heart rate variability (HRV) during a novel-object test, which is a so far unique methodology in personality research in animals, was analysed in Study II. We tested 400 calves at 90 days post natum (dpn). The test was conducted a second time four months later on 39 of these calves to test for stability over time. Four distinct personality types could be described by combining the ethological and physiological measurements: “neophobic/fearful – alert”, “interested – stressed”, “subdued/uninterested – calm”, and “neophilic/outgoing – alert”. In the evaluation of the stability of the personality types over time, more than 40 % of the calves showed a similar behaviour pattern. In Study III, data of 356 calves tested at 90 and 91 dpn, respectively, from the developed restraint test of Study I was correlated with the multidimensional depiction of cattle personality established in Study II. By linking automatically measured data to ethological and physiological data, we aimed to test whether the automated restraint test is a practicable way to test large numbers of individuals for their personality with maintained level of measure reliability. Tractive force was found to be influenced by the activation of the autonomous nervous system during the novel-object test. Although the character of this connection was surprising, this can be seen as a candidate measure that provides a basis for further developments. To conclude, it was possible to describe four distinct personality types using a multidimensional analysis of behaviour recorded during a standard behaviour test and simultaneous measurements of the HRV. Correlating the types with data of the developed restraint test revealed one candidate measure, which appeared promising for further developments of this test.
    03/2014, Degree: Doctor rerum naturalium, Doktor der Naturwissenschaften
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Social eavesdropping is the gathering of information by observing interactions between other individuals. Previous studies have claimed that dogs, Canis familiaris, are able to use information obtained via social eavesdropping, that is, preferring a generous over a selfish human donor. However, in these studies the side was constant between the demonstrations and the dogs' choices, not controlling for potential location biases. In the crucial control condition of our experiments, the donors swapped places in half of the trials before the dogs chose. We found that first choice behaviour as well as the time dogs interacted with the generous donor were influenced by location (side). In a second experiment the subject's owner interacted with the two donors. Again, the result of the side control revealed that the critical factor was location (side) not person. The results of these experiments provide no evidence for social eavesdropping in dogs and show the importance of critical control conditions.
    Animal Behaviour 04/2014; 90:263–271. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.035 · 3.07 Impact Factor