Article

Association between illness severity and timing of initial enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study

Department of Life Sciences, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, No,1, University Rd,, Tainan City 701, Taiwan. .
Nutrition Journal (Impact Factor: 2.64). 05/2012; 11(1):30. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-30
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Early enteral nutrition is recommended in cases of critical illness. It is unclear whether this recommendation is of most benefit to extremely ill patients. We aim to determine the association between illness severity and commencement of enteral feeding.
One hundred and eight critically ill patients were grouped as "less severe" and "more severe" for this cross-sectional, retrospective observational study. The cut off value was based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 20. Patients who received enteral feeding within 48 h of medical intensive care unit (ICU) admission were considered early feeding cases otherwise they were assessed as late feeding cases. Feeding complications (gastric retention/vomiting/diarrhea/gastrointestinal bleeding), length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, ventilator-associated pneumonia, hospital mortality, nutritional intake, serum albumin, serum prealbumin, nitrogen balance (NB), and 24-h urinary urea nitrogen data were collected over 21 days.
There were no differences in measured outcomes between early and late feedings for less severely ill patients. Among more severely ill patients, however, the early feeding group showed improved serum albumin (p = 0.036) and prealbumin (p = 0.014) but worsened NB (p = 0.01), more feeding complications (p = 0.005), and prolonged ICU stays (p = 0.005) compared to their late feeding counterparts.
There is a significant association between severity of illness and timing of enteral feeding initiation. In more severe illness, early feeding was associated with improved nutritional outcomes, while late feeding was associated with reduced feeding complications and length of ICU stay. However, the feeding complications of more severely ill early feeders can be handled without significantly affecting nutritional intake and there is no eventual difference in length of hospital stay or mortality between groups. Consequently, early feeding shows to be a more beneficial nutritional intervention option than late feeding in patients with more severe illness.

Full-text

Available from: Ming-Yi Liu, Jun 02, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
140 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic critical illness is a problem in the critical care environment. The ultimate goal in managing care for the chronically critically ill is liberation from mechanical ventilation, leading to improved survival and enhanced quality of life. Clinical practice guidelines are presented as a framework in providing care for this distinct patient population. Research studies supplement the recommendations to ensure best care guides critical care decisions using the best evidence in the context of patient values and clinical expertise.
    Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ccell.2014.01.001 · 0.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the differences between early and delayed enteral nutrition on nutritional intake. Methods: A pilot cohort study was conducted with 45 critically ill adult patients who had a primary medical diagnosis. Energy prescribed and received were collected during the four days after initiation of enteral nutrition. Adequate feeding was defined as the energy intake more than 90% of required energy. Results: A total of 23 patients (52%) were received early enteral nutrition (within 48 hours of admission). Energy intake of early enteral nutrition was less than intake of delayed enteral nutrition during the four days of the study. Although the difference on day one was significantly greater than the differences on day two, the differences on day two were not different from days three or four. No statistical differences in the adequacy of nutritional intake were found between patients in the early and the delayed group. Conclusion: In critically ill patients receiving early enteral nutrition, more aggressive administration from the beginning will improve the nutritional intake. Additional studies including a large multi-centre, randomized clinical trial are recommended.
    08/2013; 25(4). DOI:10.7475/kjan.2013.25.4.444
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines recommend enteral over parenteral nutrition in critical illness, and do not recommend early initiation. Few data are available on parenteral nutrition use or timing of initiation in the intensive care unit (ICU) or how this use may have changed over time. METHODS We used the Project IMPACT database to evaluate temporal trends in parenteral nutrition (total and partial parenteral nutrition and lipid supplementation) use and timing of initiation in adult ICU admissions from 2001 to 2008. We used chi-square tests and analysis of variance to examine characteristics of patients receiving parenteral nutrition and multilevel multivariate logistic regression models to assess parenteral nutrition use over time, in all patients and in specific subgroups. RESULTS Out of 337,442 patients, 20,913 (6.2%) received parenteral nutrition. Adjusting for patient characteristics, the use of parenteral nutrition decreased modestly over time (adjusted probability = 7.2% in 2001-2002 versus 5.5% in 2007-2008, P<0.001). Enteral nutrition use increased simultaneously (adjusted probability = 11.5% in 2001-2002 versus 15.3% in 2007-2008, P<0.001). Use of parenteral nutrition declined most rapidly in emergent surgical patients, patients with moderate illness severity, surgical ICU patients, and patients admitted to an academic facility (P≤0.01 for all interactions with year). When used, parenteral nutrition was initiated a median of 2 days (interquartile range 1-3), after ICU admission and more than 90% of patients had parenteral nutrition initiated within seven days; timing of initiation of parenteral nutrition did not change from 2001-2008. CONCLUSIONS Use of parenteral nutrition in United States ICUs declined from 2001 through 2008 in all patients and in all examined subgroups, with the majority of parenteral nutrition initiated within the first seven days in ICU; enteral nutrition use coincidently increased over the same time period.
    Chest 11/2013; 145(3). DOI:10.1378/chest.13-1597 · 7.13 Impact Factor