Normal-range blood lactate concentration in septic shock is prognostic and predictive.

University of British Columbia, Critical Care Research Laboratories, Institute for Heart+Lung Health, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Shock (Augusta, Ga.) (Impact Factor: 2.87). 05/2012; 38(1):4-10. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318254d41a
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We hypothesized that lactate levels even within the normal range are prognostic and that low lactate levels predict a beneficial response to vasopressin infusion in septic shock. We conducted a retrospective analysis using the Vasopressin in Septic Shock Trial (VASST) as a derivation cohort (n = 665), then validated using another single-center septic shock cohort, St Paul's Hospital (SPH) cohort (n = 469). Lactate levels were divided into quartiles. The primary outcome variable was 28-day mortality in both cohorts. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to compare the prognostic value of lactate concentrations versus Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores. We then explored whether lactate concentrations might predict beneficial response to vasopressin compared with noradrenaline in VASST. Normal lactate range is less than 2.3 mmol/L. At enrollment, patients in the second quartile (1.4 < lactate < 2.3 mmol/L) had significantly increased mortality and organ dysfunction compared with patients who had lactate ≤ 1.4 mmol/L (quartile 1) (P < 0.0001). Quartile 2 outcomes were as severe as quartile 3 (2.3 ≤ lactate < 4.4 mmol/L) outcomes. Baseline lactate values (ar ea under the ROC curve = 0.63, 0.66; VASST, SPH) were as good as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (area under the ROC curve = 0.66, 0.73; VASST, SPH) as prognostic indicators of 28-day mortality. Lactate concentrations of 1.4 mmol/L or less predicted a beneficial response in those randomized to vasopressin compared with noradrenaline in VASST (P < 0.05). Lactate concentrations within the "normal" range can be a useful prognostic indicator in septic shock. Furthermore, patients whose lactate level is less than or equal to 1.4 mmol/L may benefit from vasopressin infusion.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is overwhelming evidence that sepsis and septic shock are associated with hyperlactatemia (sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia (SAHL)). SAHL is a strong independent predictor of mortality and its presence and progression are widely appreciated by clinicians to define a very high-risk population. Until recently, the dominant paradigm has been that SAHL is a marker of tissue hypoxia. Accordingly, SAHL has been interpreted to indicate the presence of an 'oxygen debt' or 'hypoperfusion', which leads to increased lactate generation via anaerobic glycolysis. In light of such interpretation of the meaning of SAHL, maneuvers to increase oxygen delivery have been proposed as its treatment. Moreover, lactate levels have been proposed as a method to evaluate the adequacy of resuscitation and the nature of the response to the initial treatment for sepsis. However, a large body of evidence has accumulated that strongly challenges such notions. Much evidence now supports the view that SAHL is not due only to tissue hypoxia or anaerobic glycolysis. Experimental and human studies all consistently support the view that SAHL is more logically explained by increased aerobic glycolysis secondary to activation of the stress response (adrenergic stimulation). More importantly, new evidence suggests that SAHL may actually serve to facilitate bioenergetic efficiency through an increase in lactate oxidation. In this sense, the characteristics of lactate production best fit the notion of an adaptive survival response that grows in intensity as disease severity increases. Clinicians need to be aware of these developments in our understanding of SAHL in order to approach patient management according to biological principles and to interpret lactate concentrations during sepsis resuscitation according to current best knowledge.
    Critical care (London, England) 09/2014; 18(5):503. · 5.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current guidelines and most trials do not consider elevated lactate (Lac) serum concentrations when grading sepsis severity. We therefore assessed the association of different types of circulatory dysfunction regarding presence of hyperlactatemia and need for vasopressor support with clinical presentation and outcome of sepsis. In a secondary analysis of a prospective observational multicenter cohort study, 988 patients with severe sepsis were investigated regarding vasopressor support, Lac levels, and outcome. Twenty-eight-day mortality regarding shock or hyperlactatemia was as follows: hyperlactatemia more than 2.5 mmol/L and septic shock (tissue dysoxic shock): 451 patients with a mortality of 44.8%; hyperlactatemia without vasopressor need (cryptic shock): 72 patients, mortality 35.3%; no hyperlactatemia with vasopressor need (vasoplegic shock): 331 patients, mortality 27.7%; and absence of hyperlactemia or overt shock (severe sepsis): 134 patients, mortality 14.2% (P < .001). These groups showed differences in source and origin of infection. The influence of hyperlactatemia on 28-day mortality (P < .001) (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 2.1-4.1 for Lac >4 mmol/L) was independent of vasopressor support (P < .001) (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3-3.0 for norepinephrine >0.1 μg/kg per minute) in logistic regression. Hyperlactatemia increases risk of death independent of vasopressor need resulting in different phenotypes within the classic categories of severe sepsis and septic shock. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Critical Care 10/2014; · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock.
    Intensive Care Medicine 11/2014; · 5.54 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 2, 2014