Article

Ablation with Low-Dose Radioiodine and Thyrotropin Alfa in Thyroid Cancer

Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, Level 4, Freeman Rd., Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN United Kingdom.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 05/2012; 366(18):1674-85. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109589
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is not known whether low-dose radioiodine (1.1 GBq [30 mCi]) is as effective as high-dose radioiodine (3.7 GBq [100 mCi]) for treating patients with differentiated thyroid cancer or whether the effects of radioiodine (especially at a low dose) are influenced by using either recombinant human thyrotropin (thyrotropin alfa) or thyroid hormone withdrawal.
At 29 centers in the United Kingdom, we conducted a randomized noninferiority trial comparing low-dose and high-dose radioiodine, each in combination with either thyrotropin alfa or thyroid hormone withdrawal before ablation. Patients (age range, 16 to 80 years) had tumor stage T1 to T3, with possible spread to nearby lymph nodes but without metastasis. End points were the rate of success of ablation at 6 to 9 months, adverse events, quality of life, and length of hospital stay.
A total of 438 patients underwent randomization; data could be analyzed for 421. Ablation success rates were 85.0% in the group receiving low-dose radioiodine versus 88.9% in the group receiving the high dose and 87.1% in the thyrotropin alfa group versus 86.7% in the group undergoing thyroid hormone withdrawal. All 95% confidence intervals for the differences were within ±10 percentage points, indicating noninferiority. Similar results were found for low-dose radioiodine plus thyrotropin alfa (84.3%) versus high-dose radioiodine plus thyroid hormone withdrawal (87.6%) or high-dose radioiodine plus thyrotropin alfa (90.2%). More patients in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group were hospitalized for at least 3 days (36.3% vs. 13.0%, P<0.001). The proportions of patients with adverse events were 21% in the low-dose group versus 33% in the high-dose group (P=0.007) and 23% in the thyrotropin alfa group versus 30% in the group undergoing thyroid hormone withdrawal (P=0.11).
Low-dose radioiodine plus thyrotropin alfa was as effective as high-dose radioiodine, with a lower rate of adverse events. (Funded by Cancer Research UK; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00415233.).

0 Followers
 · 
258 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Targeted therapy pinpointing specific alteration in cancer cells has gained an important role in the treatment of cancer. Compounds that re-induce thyroid-specific functions could be particularly useful in differentiated thyroid cancers by rendering them susceptible to radioiodine treatment, which is relatively specific and has few adverse effects. This review describes the rationale for radioiodine treatment, considering the targets of compounds with differentiation-inducing effects, and the impact of these drugs on the expression of thyroid-specific proteins and on iodine-uptake. We survey the results from the clinical trials thus far performed. We conclude that although retinoids, thiazolidinediones, histone deacetylase inhibitors and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors do increase the expression of thyroid-specific proteins, their clinical efficacy is limited. The relatively low rate of remissions in clinical trials with re-differentiating compounds could be due to low levels of the target, heterogeneity of iodine uptake into the tumor, poor correlation of radioiodine uptake and clinical remission, and/or the slow onset of the therapeutic effect. Although the mode of action is not clear, the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and RAI treatment could improve clinical responses in non-radioiodine avid metastatic thyroid carcinoma.
    Cancer Treatment Reviews 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.01.002 · 6.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Radioactive therapy with (131)I (RAI) is commonly used during the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The aim of this study was to determine the clinical significance of discordant findings between pre-RAI whole body scan (WBS) with (123)I and post-RAI WBS in the management of DTC. We retrospectively evaluated 342 individuals between 2002 and 2008 who had a diagnosis of DTC and underwent RAI. All had WBS one day before RAI and WBS one week after RAI. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) RAI-naive subjects without known distant metastatic disease (M1); 2) patients with history of prior RAI and persistent disease (except M1); and 3) patients with known M1. In Group 1 (n=311), 7% of patients (n=22) had discordant scans, but in only 4 of these cases did this represent true disease (3 unsuspected lung and 1 mediastinal node metastasis). In the remaining 18 patients, discordant findings corresponded to physiologic or other benign causes. In group 2 (n=23), 7 subjects (30%) had discordant findings and all of the discrepant sites consisted of loco-regional nodal disease in the neck/upper mediastinum (n=6) and M1 in lung (n=1). In group 3 (n=8), 5 patients (62%) showed discordant uptake in lung and bone which corresponded to the locations of known M1. A total of 12 patients with iodine-avid M1 were identified on post-RAI WBS (3.5% of entire cohort). Pre-RAI WBS was only concordant in 3 of these cases (25%). In conclusion, the significance of pre and post-RAI WBS is highly influenced by the clinical setting. Unsuspected distant metastatic disease is infrequent in RAI-naive patients without known M1, where most discordant findings are usually due to benign explanations, and represent false positive findings in this group. In contrast, in patients with history of previous RAI or known M1, discordant results likely correspond to true disease. In our study, pre-RAI scans showed a low yield to detect iodine-avid distant metastatic disease when compared to post-RAI scans.
    International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 01/2013; 6(5):320-33. · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has already been shown that remnant ablation in patients with thyroid cancer and lymph node (LN) metastases has similar results when patients are prepared after recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) therapy or thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW). Due to the current changes in the risk-of-recurrence classifications, we decided to evaluate the initial response to treatment and the outcome at medium-term follow-up in 40 consecutive patients with clinically relevant lymph nodes who received radioiodine remnant ablation after rhTSH therapy (n = 20) or THW (n = 20). Each patient received either 100 or 150 mCi 131-I for ablation based on TNM status, and the mean amounts of 131-I used in the 2 groups were not significantly different. An excellent response to treatment was observed in 45% of the patients prepared after rhTSH therapy compared to 20% of those prepared after THW (p = 0.08). Three patients (2 in the THW group and 1 in the rhTSH group) who had N1a in the initial surgery presented with structural persistence as an initial response to treatment. One patient in the THW group had a follow-up of the persistent disease with no surgical treatment, and 2 others received a lateral LN dissection. When the status at final follow-up was considered (median follow-up 3.3 years, range 3-4.2), 60% of the patients ablated after rhTSH therapy were considered with no evidence of disease, compared to 30% of those who underwent THW. The frequency of structural persistence (metastatic LN) was similar in the 2 groups (15 vs. 25%), and the distribution of the responses at final follow-up was not statistically significantly different (p = 0.12). We conclude that preparation after rhTSH therapy seems to be as effective as after THW for patients with clinically relevant LN metastases.