Maternal superobesity and perinatal outcomes

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (Impact Factor: 3.97). 05/2012; 206(5):417.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.037
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of maternal superobesity (body mass index [BMI], ≥ 50 kg/m(2)) compared with morbid obesity (BMI, 40-49.9 kg/m(2)) or obesity (BMI, 30-39.9 kg/m(2)) on perinatal outcomes.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of birth records that were linked to hospital discharge data for all liveborn singleton term infants who were born to obese Missouri residents from 2000-2006. We excluded major congenital anomalies and women with diabetes mellitus or chronic hypertension.
There were 64,272 births that met the study criteria, which included 1185 superobese mothers (1.8%). Superobese women were significantly more likely than obese women to have preeclampsia (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.1), macrosomia (aRR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5), and cesarean delivery (aRR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.1). Almost one-half of all superobese women (49.1%) delivered by cesarean section, and 33.8% of superobese nulliparous women underwent scheduled primary cesarean delivery.
Women with a BMI of ≥ 50 kg/m(2) are at significantly increased risk for perinatal complications compared with obese women with a lower BMI.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obesity is increasing worldwide, especially in the USA. This is reflected in the pregnant population, with up to a third of women classified as obese during their pregnancy. It poses a challenge to the practitioners throughout pregnancy, labor and delivery, as well as in postpartum care. Obesity is also a risk factor for multiple pregnancy complications including gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, iatrogenic preterm birth, fetal macrosomia and intrauterine fetal demise. Antenatal care challenges, including limitation of fetal ultrasound evaluation, contribute to a greater number of undetected anomalies and poor fetal weight estimation. Maternal risks such as increased rates of cesarean section, and subsequent postoperative complications such as wound infection and venous thromboembolic events, are increasing in prevalence. Optimal prenatal care requires knowledge of and attention to each of these risks and appropriate patient counseling.
    Expert Review of Obstetrics &amp Gynecology 01/2014; 7(6). DOI:10.1586/eog.12.53
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) and incision-to-delivery interval and total operative time at cesarean delivery. METHODS: Women with singleton gestations undergoing uncomplicated primary and repeat cesarean deliveries were identified from the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Cesarean Registry. Women were classified by BMI category at time of delivery (normal 18.5-24.9, overweight 25.0-29.9, obese 30.0-39.9, and morbidly obese 40 or greater). Incision-to-delivery interval and total operative times during cesarean delivery were compared among the three groups. Primary outcome was prolonged incision-to-delivery interval as defined by 90th percentile or greater of the study population or 18 minutes or longer. RESULTS: Of the 21,372 women included in the analysis, 9,928 were obese (46.5%) and 2,988 (14.0%) were morbidly obese. Longer operative times were found among women with overweight (median [interquartile range] incision-to-delivery: 9.0 [6.0] and total operative time: 45.0 [21.0] minutes), obese (10.0 [7.0]; 48.0 [22.0] minutes), and morbidly obese BMIs (12.0 [8.0]; 55.0 [26.0] minutes) compared with women with normal BMI at delivery (9.0 [5.0]; 43.0 [20.0] minutes) (P,. 001). Morbidly obese women had a more frequent incision-to-delivery interval that was 18 minutes or longer (n=602 [20%] compared with 127 [6%] in normal BMI). After adjustments including number of prior cesarean deliveries, incision-to-delivery interval 18 minutes or longer was significantly related to obese (odds ratio [OR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.03) and morbidly obese (OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.24-3.56) BMI at delivery. CONCLUSION: Increasing BMI is related to increased incision-to-delivery interval and total operative time at cesarean delivery with morbidly obese BMI exposing women to the highest risk of prolonged incision-to-delivery interval.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 09/2014; 124(4). DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000462 · 4.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the association of antenatal weight gain above and below the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines in the super-obese population (body mass index [BMI] of 50 or higher) on the maternal and neonatal morbidities of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia (pregnancy-induced hypertension), gestational diabetes mellitus, cesarean delivery, birth weight more than 4,000 g and more than 4,500 g, low birth weight, and preterm birth. The effect of gestational weight gain was assessed in this retrospective cohort study using California birth certificate and patient discharge diagnosis data. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as a function of antenatal weight gain. Weight gain within 2009 IOM guidelines (11-20 pounds) served as the reference group. The study population consisted of 1,034 women. Women gaining below, within, and above IOM guidelines accounted for 38.3, 23.5, and 38.2%, respectively. Weight gain below IOM guidelines was not associated with a statistically increased odds of preterm birth (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.60-5.59) or low birth weight (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.57-2.49); however, birth weight more than 4,000 g was significantly reduced (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77). Excessive weight gain statistically increased the odds of pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.26-3.03) and cesarean delivery (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.00-1.97) while not appearing to protect against the delivery of low-birth-weight neonates (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.78). Weight gain below the current guidelines in the super-obese cohort is not associated with an increase in maternal or neonatal risk while decreasing the odds of delivering a macrosomic neonate. Women with BMIs of 50 or higher may warrant separate gestational weight gain recommendations. : II.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 12/2014; 124(6):1105-10. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000553 · 4.37 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014