Reproductive outcomes in women with classic bladder exstrophy: an observational cross-sectional study
ABSTRACT We sought to examine the reproductive outcomes of 52 women with classical bladder exstrophy.
This was an observational study with cross-sectional and retrospective arms.
The average age of the sample was 33 years (range, 17-63). Of those who had tried, 19/38 (66%) had conceived. A total of 57 pregnancies (3 sets of twins) were reported for the 19 patients and resulted in 34/57 live births (56%), 21/57 miscarriages (35%), 1/57 (2%) termination, and 4/57 (7%) stillbirths or neonatal deaths. Four deliveries resulted in major complications including 1 transection of the ureter (4%), 1 fistula formation (4%), and 2 postpartum hemorrhages (8%). There were 2 admissions to intensive care, one for urinary sepsis and another for massive obstetric hemorrhage.
Fertility is impaired in women with bladder exstrophy. Pregnancy is high risk both for the mother and baby. Delivery should be at a tertiary referral obstetric unit with urology cover. In the majority of cases planned cesarean section is the most appropriate mode of delivery.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "However, our study suggests that more females than males had an unfulfilled wish to have children. Deans et al.  described that 21% of their female patients conceived within 1 year after unprotected sexual intercourse, whereas the majority (79%) had delayed conceiving. Those 19 female patients had a total of 57 pregnancies, which resulted in 34 (56%) live births. "
ABSTRACT: The bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex (BEEC) comprises a spectrum of congenital anomalies that represents the severe end of urorectal malformations, and has a profound impact on continence as well as sexual and renal functions. The relation between severity of BEEC and its associated functional impairments, on one hand, and the resulting restrictions in quality of life and potential psychopathology determine the patients' outcome. It is important for improving further outcome to identify BEEC-related sources of distress in the long term. Genital function and sexuality becomes an important issue for adolescent and adult BEEC individuals. Hence, the present study focused on sexual function and psychological adaption in patients with BEEC. In a multicenter study 52 patients (13 females, 39 males) with classic bladder exstrophy (BE) with their bladders in use were assessed by a self-developed questionnaire about sexual function, and psychosexual and psychosocial outcome. The patients were born between 1948 and 1994 (median age 31 years). Twelve of 13 (92%) females and 25 of 39 (64%) males with classic BE had answered the questions on sexual function. Of these, 50% females and 92% males answered that they masturbated. Females had sexual intercourse more frequently. Six (50%) females affirmed dyspareunia whereas only two (8%) males reported pain during erection. Eight (67%) females specified having orgasms. Eighteen (72%) males were able to ejaculate. Two males and none of the females lived in a committed partnership (Figure). Two (15%) females and 13 (33%) males answered all psychosocial questions. The majority of these patients had concerns about satisfactory sexuality and lasting, happy partnerships. A minority of patients of both sexes were willing to answer psychosocial questions. Sexual activity and relationships of many adult BE patients seems to be impaired. Not surprisingly, sexual activity and awareness were different in males and females even in a multi-organ anomaly. To date, one of the main goals of the medical treatment of BEEC/BE patients is to enable normal sexual life and fertility. However, only a few outcome studies have focused on these issues with contradicting results, most of them not using standardized outcome measures. In accordance with other studies, our female BE patients have dyspareunia and most of our male BE patients were able to ejaculate. But the question of normal force of ejaculation, ejaculated volume, or semen analysis remains unanswered. Despite partial confirmation of previous findings, there is inconsistency referring to the outcome measured by the available studies. This might in part be explained by the fact that, other than this study, most previous studies are the result of single-institution experience. Thus, selection bias in the patient sampling due to different a clinical collective in different hospitals may be the consequence. Furthermore, patients' honesty and self-reflection in answering difficult questions regarding their sexual and cosmetic impairments is questionable. In addition, studies include a wide range of age groups and are connected with this life period. Fears and condition-specific anxieties might change over time. Hence, the strengths of this study are the nationwide and treating physician-independent data acquisition as well as the large sample size of adult patients with a very rare congenital malformation. Unfortunately, more detailed analyses on sexual function and current psychosocial situation, for example correlation of data with clinical symptoms such as continence status, was not possible as data were mainly not answered by patients. To improve the quality of life of patients with BEEC/BE, treatment and follow-up should emphasize physical but also psychological care in these patients. Physicians should further re-evaluate their preconceptions and should take care of the patients throughout their lives. Copyright © 2015 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Journal of Pediatric Urology 03/2015; 11(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.02.001 · 1.41 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We report the case of a pregnancy in a 25-year-old woman who was born with ectopia vesicae and split pelvis, but had not undergone any reconstructive or diversion surgery in childhood. Her antenatal period was uneventful and the infant was delivered by cesarean section at term due to breech presentation. The baby had no congenital anomalies. The postoperative period was uneventful and they were discharged from the hospital in a good general condition.Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 12/2012; 39(4). DOI:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.02053.x · 0.93 Impact Factor
- Archives of Gynecology 03/2013; 288(4). DOI:10.1007/s00404-013-2790-3 · 1.28 Impact Factor