Article

Runx2 mediates epigenetic silencing of the bone morphogenetic protein-3B (BMP-3B/GDF10) in lung cancer cells

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Rush University Medical Center, Armour Academic Center, 600 S, Paulina St, Suite 507, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Molecular Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.4). 04/2012; 11:27. DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-11-27
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Runt-related transcription factor Runx2 is essential for bone development but is also implicated in progression of several cancers of breast, prostate and bone, where it activates cancer-related genes and promotes invasive properties. The transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) family member bone morphogenetic protein-3B (BMP-3B/GDF10) is regarded as a tumor growth inhibitor and a gene silenced in lung cancers; however the regulatory mechanisms leading to its silencing have not been identified.
Here we show that Runx2 is highly expressed in lung cancer cells and downregulates BMP-3B. This inverse relationship between Runx2 and BMP-3B expression is further supported by increased expression of BMP-3B in mesenchymal cells from Runx2 deficient mice. The ectopic expression of Runx2, but not DNA binding mutant Runx2, in normal lung fibroblast cells and lung cancer cells resulted in suppression of BMP-3B levels. The chromatin immunoprecipitation studies identified that the mechanism of Runx2-mediated suppression of BMP-3B is due to the recruitment of Runx2 and histone H3K9-specific methyltransferase Suv39h1 to BMP-3B proximal promoter and a concomitant increase in histone methylation (H3K9) status. The knockdown of Runx2 in H1299 cells resulted in decreased histone H3K9 methylation on BMP-3B promoter and increased BMP-3B expression levels. Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation studies showed a direct interaction of Runx2 and Suv39h1 proteins. Phenotypically, Runx2 overexpression in H1299 cells increased wound healing response to TGFβ treatment.
Our studies identified BMP-3B as a new Runx2 target gene and revealed a novel function of Runx2 in silencing of BMP-3B in lung cancers. Our results suggest that Runx2 is a potential therapeutic target to block tumor suppressor gene silencing in lung cancer cells.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jitesh Pratap, Feb 05, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
159 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Summary The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) family consists of several growth factor proteins that belong to the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily. BMPs bind to type I and type II serine-threonine kinase receptors, and transduce signals through the Smad signalling pathway. BMPs have been identified in mammalian ovaries, and functional studies have shown that they are involved in the regulation of oogenesis and folliculogenesis. This review summarizes the role of the BMP system during formation, growth and maturation of ovarian follicles in mammals.
    Zygote 01/2015; DOI:10.1017/S096719941400077X · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Plant homeodomain finger protein 2 (PHF2), which contains a plant homeodomain and a Jumonji-C domain, is an epigenetic regulator that demethylates lysine 9 in histone 3 (H3K9me2). On the other hand, runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) plays essential roles in bone development and regeneration. Given previous reports that the PHF2 mutation can cause dwarfism in mice and that PHF2 expression is correlated with that of Runx2 in differentiating thymocytes, we investigated whether PHF2 regulates Runx2-mediated bone formation. Overexpression of PHF2 facilitated bone development in newborn mice, and viral shRNA-mediated knockdown of PHF2 delayed calvarial bone regeneration in adult rats. In primary osteoblasts and C2C12 precursor cells, PHF2 enhances osteoblast differentiation by demethylating Runx2, while suppressor of variegation 3-9 homolog 1 (SUV39H1) inhibits bone formation by methylating it. The PHF2-Runx2 interaction is mediated by the Jumonji-C and Runt domains of the two proteins, respectively. The interaction between Runx2 and osteocalcin promoter is regulated by the methylation status of Runx2, i.e., the interaction is augmented when Runx2 is demethylated. Our results suggest that SUV39H1 and PHF2 reciprocally regulate osteoblast differentiation by modulating Runx2-driven transcription at the post-translational level. This study may provide a theoretical basis for the development of new therapeutic modalities for patients with impaired bone development or delayed fracture healing.Cell Research advance online publication 26 September 2014; doi:10.1038/cr.2014.127.
    Cell Research 09/2014; 24(10). DOI:10.1038/cr.2014.127 · 11.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim. To investigate clinical significance of runt-related transcription factor (RUNX)-2 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods. RUNX2 protein expression and its subcellular localization were detected by immunohistochemistry in 116 patients with EOC. Results. RUNX2 protein was predominantly expressed in cell nucleus of EOC tissues. The expression level of RUNX2 in EOC tissues was significantly higher than that in normal ovarian tissues (P < 0.001). In addition, the nuclear labeling index (LI) of RUNX2 in tumor cells was significantly associated with the advanced clinical stage of EOC tissues (P = 0.001). Moreover, EOC patients with high RUNX2 LI had significantly shorter overall (P < 0.001) and progression-free (P = 0.002) survival than those with low RUNX2 LI. Especially, subgroup analysis revealed that EOC patients with high clinical stages (III~IV) in high RUNX2 expression group demonstrated a significantly worse clinical outcome than those in low RUNX2 expression group, but patients with low clinical stages (I~II) had no significantly different prognosis between high and low RUNX2 expression groups. Conclusions. Our data suggest for the first time that RUNX2 overexpression is associated with advanced tumor progression and poor clinical outcome of EOC patients. RUNX2 might be a novel prognostic marker of EOC.
    BioMed Research International 10/2012; 2012:456534. DOI:10.1155/2012/456534 · 2.71 Impact Factor