Association Between Hospital Recognition for Nursing Excellence and Outcomes of Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, Department of Sociology, and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6096, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 04/2012; 307(16):1709-16. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.504
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Infants born at very low birth weight (VLBW) require high levels of nursing intensity. The role of nursing in outcomes for these infants in the United States is not known.
To examine the relationships between hospital recognition for nursing excellence (RNE) and VLBW infant outcomes.
Cohort study of 72,235 inborn VLBW infants weighing 501 to 1500 g born in 558 Vermont Oxford Network hospital neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2008. Hospital RNE was determined from the American Nurses Credentialing Center. The RNE designation is awarded when nursing care achieves exemplary practice or leadership in 5 areas.
Seven-day, 28-day, and hospital stay mortality; nosocomial infection, defined as an infection in blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture occurring more than 3 days after birth; and severe (grade 3 or 4) intraventricular hemorrhage.
Overall, the outcome rates were as follows: for 7-day mortality, 7.3% (5258/71,955); 28-day mortality, 10.4% (7450/71,953); hospital stay mortality, 12.9% (9278/71,936); severe intraventricular hemorrhage, 7.6% (4842/63,525); and infection, 17.9% (11,915/66,496). The 7-day mortality was 7.0% in RNE hospitals and 7.4% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99; P = .04). The 28-day mortality was 10.0% in RNE hospitals and 10.5% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-1.01; P = .08). Hospital stay mortality was 12.4% in RNE hospitals and 13.1% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.01; P = .06). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage was 7.2% in RNE hospitals and 7.8% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.00; P = .045). Infection was 16.7% in RNE hospitals and 18.3% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; P = .04). Compared with RNE hospitals, the adjusted absolute decrease in risk of outcomes in RNE hospitals ranged from 0.9% to 2.1%. All 5 outcomes were jointly significant (P < .001). The mean effect across all 5 outcomes was OR, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.94; P < .001). In a subgroup of 68,253 infants with gestational age of 24 weeks or older, the ORs for RNE for all 3 mortality outcomes and infection were statistically significant.
Among VLBW infants born in RNE hospitals compared with non-RNE hospitals, there was a significantly lower risk-adjusted rate of 7-day mortality, nosocomial infection, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage but not of 28-day mortality or hospital stay mortality.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael Kenny, Jun 30, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research has shown that hospitals with better nurse staffing and work environments have better nurse outcomes-less burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intention to leave the job. Many studies, however, have not accounted for wage effects, which may confound findings. By using a secondary analysis with cross-sectional administrative data and a four-state survey of nurses, we investigated how wage, work environment, and staffing were associated with nurse outcomes. Logistic regression models, with and without wage, were used to estimate the effects of work environment and staffing on burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intent to leave. We discovered that wage was associated with job dissatisfaction and intent to leave but had little influence on burnout, while work environment and average patient-to-nurse ratio still have considerable effects on nurse outcomes. Wage is important for good nurse outcomes, but it does not diminish the significant influence of work environment and staffing on nurse outcomes.
    Policy Politics &amp Nursing Practice 08/2014; 15(3-4). DOI:10.1177/1527154414546868
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: More than 30 years of evidence demonstrates improved survival for very low-birth-weight (VLBW; <1500 g) or very preterm (<32 weeks' gestation) infants born at level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) compared with those born at lower-level facilities.1 However, little is known about the components of the quality of care provided within these NICUs.In this issue of JAMA, Lake and colleagues consider an important dimension within the NICU—the provision of neonatal nursing care.2 Neonatal nurses in the United States are credentialed and highly trained specialists who provide a constant vigil at the bedside of critically ill patients.3 Nurses assess and monitor the status of vulnerable patients with actions including maintaining a patent airway, preventing hospital-acquired infections, assessing the status of multiple organ systems, conducting and assisting in procedures, as well as caring for the overall needs of the infant and the concerns of the mother and family. Given the high risk of death and severe morbidity among the infants for whom they provide care, these professionals must be dedicated to the principles of quality nursing care.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 04/2012; 307(16):1750-1. DOI:10.1001/jama.2012.538 · 30.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 08/2012; 109(31-32):517-8. DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2012.0517 · 3.61 Impact Factor

Similar Publications