Article

Longitudinal follow-up of children with autism receiving targeted interventions on joint attention and play.

Center for Autism Research and Treatment, University of California at Los Angeles Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.97). 05/2012; 51(5):487-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.02.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examines the cognitive and language outcomes of children with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) over a 5-year period after receiving targeted early interventions that focused on joint attention and play skills.
Forty children from the original study (n = 58) had complete data at the 5-year follow-up.
In all, 80% of children had achieved functional use of spoken language with baseline play level predicting spoken language at the 5-year follow-up. Of children who were using spoken language at age 8 years, several baseline behaviors predicted their later ability, including earlier age of entry into the study, initiating joint attention skill, play level, and assignment to either the joint attention or symbolic play intervention group. Only baseline play diversity predicted cognitive scores at age 8 years.
This study is one of the only long-term follow-up studies of children who participated in preschool early interventions aimed at targeting core developmental difficulties. The study findings suggest that focusing on joint attention and play skills in comprehensive treatment models is important for long-term spoken language outcomes.

3 Bookmarks
 · 
111 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent studies have suggested that skill acquisition rates for children with autism spectrum disorders receiving early interventions can be predicted by child motivation. We examined whether level of interest during an Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule assessment at 2 years predicts subsequent rates of verbal, nonverbal, and adaptive skill acquisition to the age of 3 years. A total of 70 toddlers with autism spectrum disorder, mean age of 21.9 months, were scored using Interest Level Scoring for Autism, quantifying toddlers' interest in toys, social routines, and activities that could serve as reinforcers in an intervention. Adaptive level and mental age were measured concurrently (Time 1) and again after a mean of 16.3 months of treatment (Time 2). Interest Level Scoring for Autism score, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule score, adaptive age equivalent, verbal and nonverbal mental age, and intensity of intervention were entered into regression models to predict rates of skill acquisition. Interest level at Time 1 predicted subsequent acquisition rate of adaptive skills (R(2) = 0.36) and verbal mental age (R(2) = 0.30), above and beyond the effects of Time 1 verbal and nonverbal mental ages and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule scores. Interest level at Time 1 also contributed (R(2) = 0.30), with treatment intensity, to variance in development of nonverbal mental age.
    Autism 11/2014; DOI:10.1177/1362361314555376 · 2.27 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little is known on how the conceptual description of Shared Decision Making (SDM) accomplishes clinical practice in the context of lifetime disabilities as in particular Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), when intervention is long-lasting and requires constant family involvement. This study aimed mainly to investigate to what extent the staff's competence in SDM contributes to positive child and parent improvement when involving parents in Early Intensive Behavior Interventions (EIBI). It was also geared to verify whether SDM staff competence contributes to a child's treatment responsiveness. A total of 25 young children with ASD (23 male, 3 female, age range 34-92 months, mean age 51.4±13.6) were included in the study. Of these, nine children were allocated to a Parent Involvement condition accompanied by SDM Staff Training (PI-SDM), and eight children to a Parent Inclusion in Treatment Delivery Only condition without SDM Staff Training (PI-DO). Nine months treatment outcomes of severity, developmental and adaptive measures were compared to Treatment As Usual (n=8). PI-SDM was associated with improvement of autistic symptoms (p≤.05), adaptive functioning (p≤.01) and developmental outcome (p≤.01), as well as parent (p≤.05) and staff competence (p≤.001). The magnitude of outcome was inferior in the PI-PO and TAU group. A Reliable Change was identified in more than 40% of children included in PI-SDM, while PI-PO (>20%) and TAU (>12%) let to little Reliable Change and partially skill deterioration. Staff's SDM skill competence predicts reduced parental stress (β=-.500, p≤.05) and contributes significantly to a positive treatment responder trajectory (p≤.01), besides lower severity (p≤.05), higher adaptive (p≤.01) and communication skills (p≤.05). The study indicates that parent inclusion should be conceptualized as a collaborative partnership model rather than as adherence in treatment provision, based on a target SDM staff training that may constitute an external contributor to treatment responsiveness and positive child as well as parent outcome. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Research in Developmental Disabilities 12/2014; 38C:48-63. DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.11.016 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: There is substantial variation in language and intellectual outcomes in children with ASD. A recent study suggests that the number of stimuli that children find reinforcing may constitute a predictor of response to behavioral treatment in preschool-aged children with ASD (Klintwall & Eikeseth, 2012). However, very little is known if a similar effect can be found in children presenting for a differential diagnosis of ASD in the second year of life. Advancing our understanding of factors that affect amenability to treatment at the very early stages of ASD emergence would improve our ability to individualize treatments very early on and to enhance outcome in the affected children. Moreover, in contrast with our original work, which was based on informant report, in this study we intended to design and test a coding system based on children’s responses to play probes in the context of semi-structured interaction with an examiner. Objectives: To address this gap we investigated child interest in objects and activities during the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Toddler Module (ADOS-T; Lord et al, 2000) assessment as a predictor of subsequent development measured by adaptive behavior and verbal and non-verbal developmental quotient (DQ) at ages 2-4 years. Methods: Reinforcing function of stimuli can be approximated from exhibited affect and attention towards the object or activity. Based on our previous work (Klintwall & Eikeseth, 2012), we developed a novel scoring system for capturing toddlers’ interest in potential reinforcers (e.g. edibles, toys): the Assessment of Volition and Object Curiosity (AVOC). The scoring system yields a mean interest score. AVOC was used to score video recordings of 70 toddlers with ASD who underwent assessment between 14 and 32 months (Time 1). Developmental (Mullen Scales of Early Learning; Mullen, 1995) and adaptive skills (Vineland Adaptive Behaviors Scales-II; Sparrow, et al., 2005) were measured concurrently and then again when the children were 21 to 49 months old (Time 2). Between measurements, the children received a variety of community-based behavioral and developmental interventions. Results: The AVOC scoring system exhibited acceptable levels of test-retest (0.80) and inter-rater reliability (0.90). AVOC score, ADOS-T total score, Mullen verbal and nonverbal DQ, and Vineland adaptive full scale score (Adaptive Behavior Composite; VABC) was entered into linear regression models at Time 1 to predict outcome at Time 2 defined as VABC, verbal DQ and non-verbal DQ. The AVOC score was the only significant predictor of Time 2 adaptive behavior (p=.001, R2=.394) as well as non-verbal DQ (p=.024, R2=.277), outperforming Time 1 verbal DQ (p=.216 and p=.226, respectively), non-verbal DQ (p=.652 and p=.856) and ADOS-T scores (p=.305 and p=.285). AVOC score at Time 1 also contributed, along with non-verbal DQ, to variance in verbal DQ at Time 2 (p=.009, R2=.318). Conclusions: Interest in potential reinforcers was a powerful predictor of subsequent development for toddlers with ASD. Future studies should aim to evaluate and develop techniques for identifying and expanding the repertoire of stimuli functioning as reinforcers for children who score low on the AVOC, thus possibly improving their outcomes.
    2014 International Meeting for Autism Research; 05/2014

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
6 Downloads
Available from
Mar 9, 2015