Article

Health care as a “market good”? Appendicitis as a case study.

University of California, San Francisco, and Ecologic Institute, Berlin, Germany (Dr Srebotnjak).
Archives of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 11.46). 04/2012; 172(10):818-9. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1173
Source: PubMed
1 Bookmark
 · 
101 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the between-hospital variation of charges and discounted prices for uncomplicated vaginal and caesarean section deliveries, and to determine the institutional and market-level characteristics that influence adjusted charges. Using data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), we conducted a cross-sectional study of all privately insured patients admitted to California hospitals in 2011 for uncomplicated vaginal delivery (diagnosis-related group (DRG) 775) or uncomplicated caesarean section (DRG 766). Hospital charges and discounted prices adjusted for each patient's clinical and demographic characteristics. We analysed 76 766 vaginal deliveries and 32 660 caesarean sections in California in 2011. After adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, we found that the average California woman could be charged as little as US$3296 or as much as US$37 227 for a vaginal delivery, and US$8312-US$70 908 for a caesarean section depending on which hospital she was admitted to. The discounted prices were, on an average, 37% of the charges. We found that hospitals in markets with middling competition had significantly lower adjusted charges for vaginal deliveries, while hospitals with higher wage indices and casemixes, as well as for-profit hospitals, had higher adjusted charges. Hospitals in markets with higher uninsurance rates charged significantly less for caesarean sections, while for-profit hospitals and hospitals with higher wage indices charged more. However, the institutional and market-level factors included in our models explained only 35-36% of the between-hospital variation in charges. These results indicate that charges and discounted prices for two common, relatively homogeneous diagnosis groups-uncomplicated vaginal delivery and caesarean section-vary widely between hospitals and are not well explained by observable patient or hospital characteristics.
    BMJ Open 01/2014; 4(1):e004017. · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the variation in charges for 10 common blood tests across California hospitals in 2011, and to analyse the hospital and market-level factors that may explain any observed variation.
    BMJ Open 01/2014; 4(8):e005482. · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to longitudinally evaluate the pattern of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) alterations, as an indirect convalescence index after appendectomy, to assess the timing of its restoration to the healthy population levels and to attempt a profound investigation into factors determining HRQoL outcomes.
    International Journal of Surgery (London, England) 07/2014; · 1.44 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from