Pathophysiologic differences among Asians, native Hawaiians, and other Pacific Islanders and treatment implications.

Asian American Diabetes Initiative, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Diabetes care (Impact Factor: 8.57). 05/2012; 35(5):1189-98. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0212
Source: PubMed


Available from: Mele A Look, Jun 04, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Republic of the Marshall Islands is a sovereign nation previously under the administrative control of the United States. Since 1986, the Compacts of Free Association (COFA) between the Republic of the Marshall Islands and the United States allows Marshall Islands citizens to freely enter, lawfully reside, and work in the United States, and provides the United States exclusive military control of the region. When the COFA was signed, COFA migrants were eligible for Medicaid and other safety net programs. However, these migrants were excluded from benefits as a consequence of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. Currently, COFA migrants have limited access to health care benefits in the United States, which perpetuates health inequalities. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print February 25, 2015: e1-e6. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302452).
    American Journal of Public Health 02/2015; 105(4):e1-e6. DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302452 · 4.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Asian Americans manifest type 2 diabetes at low BMI levels but may not undergo diagnostic testing for diabetes if the currently recommended BMI screening cut point of ≥25 kg/m(2) is followed. We aimed to ascertain an appropriate lower BMI cut point among Asian-American adults without a prior diabetes diagnosis. We consolidated data from 1,663 participants, ages ≥45 years, without a prior diabetes diagnosis, from population- and community-based studies, including the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America study, the North Kohala Study, the Seattle Japanese American Community Diabetes Study, and the University of California San Diego Filipino Health Study. Clinical measures included a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, BMI, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Mean age was 59.7 years, mean BMI was 25.4 kg/m(2), 58% were women, and type 2 diabetes prevalence (American Diabetes Association 2010 criteria) was 16.9%. At BMI ≥25 kg/m(2), sensitivity (63.7%), specificity (52.8%), and Youden index (0.16) values were low; limiting screening to BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) would miss 36% of Asian Americans with type 2 diabetes. For screening purposes, higher sensitivity is desirable to minimize missing cases, especially if the diagnostic test is relatively simple and inexpensive. At BMI ≥23 kg/m(2), sensitivity (84.7%) was high in the total sample and by sex and Asian-American subgroup and would miss only ∼15% of Asian Americans with diabetes. The BMI cut point for identifying Asian Americans who should be screened for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes should be <25 kg/m(2), and ≥23 kg/m(2) may be the most practical. © 2015 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.
    Diabetes Care 02/2015; 38(5). DOI:10.2337/dc14-2071 · 8.57 Impact Factor
  • Diabetes Care 01/2015; 38(1):150-158. DOI:10.2337/dc14-2391 · 8.57 Impact Factor