Safety Belt Laws and Disparities in Safety Belt Use Among US High-School Drivers

Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, Center for Health Initiatives, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 04/2012; 102(6):1128-34. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300493
Source: PubMed


We compared reported safety belt use, for both drivers and passengers, among teenagers with learner's permits, provisional licenses, and unrestricted licenses in states with primary or secondary enforcement of safety belt laws.
Our data source was the 2006 National Young Driver Survey, which included a national representative sample of 3126 high-school drivers. We used multivariate, log-linear regression analyses to assess associations between safety belt laws and belt use.
Teenaged drivers were 12% less likely to wear a safety belt as drivers and 15% less likely to wear one as passengers in states with a secondary safety belt law than in states with a primary law. The apparent reduction in belt use among teenagers as they progressed from learner to unrestricted license holder occurred in only secondary enforcement states. Groups reporting particularly low use included African American drivers, rural residents, academically challenged students, and those driving pickup trucks.
The results provided further evidence for enactment of primary enforcement provisions in safety belt laws because primary laws are associated with higher safety belt use rates and lower crash-related injuries and mortality.

12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Injury is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among US children, and an important driver of health status globally. Despite its enormous burden, injury is preventable. Over the last 10 years, significant progress has been made in the reduction of unintentional injury among US children. However, aggregate trends mask important disparities by age group, region, and injury mechanism. Basic and translation research is needed to develop and test prevention strategies to address these new or recalcitrant problems. Motor vehicle occupant injury has fallen to historic lows, but challenges remain in protecting novice drivers and managing the distraction of new technologies. Injury to pedestrians has also declined, but likely as a result of decreased exposure as fewer children walk. This calls for a broader public health perspective to promote activity while enhancing safety. Deaths due to drowning are common and illustrate the difficulty in measuring and promoting appropriate supervision. Environmental modification and use of protective products may be a more appropriate response. Concussion in sport is another challenging issue: public health laws promote identification and appropriate management of concussed athletes, but less progress has been made on primary prevention of these injuries. Unintentional poisoning is on the rise, attributable to misuse of, and overdose with, prescription opioids. Injury deaths to infants are also increasing. This trend is driven in part by better death investigation that classifies more sleep-related deaths as suffocation events. Finally, we examine a sample of cross-cutting themes and controversies in injury control that might be amenable to empiric evaluation.
    Academic pediatrics 09/2013; 13(6). DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.016 · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT Background: Seatbelts are the most effective method of decreasing fatal and non-fatal motor vehicle crash injury. Advocacy groups have recently been successful enacting repeals of mandatory motorcycle helmet laws in several states. In some states, this has prompted renewed efforts aimed at repealing mandatory seatbelt laws. Purpose: To evaluate and quantify the potential impact of rescinding seatbelt laws on annual crash related fatalities, non-fatal injuries and associated economic costs, using Michigan as a model, to inform the national debate. Methods: Proportional injury rates were calculated utilizing police-reported statewide passenger vehicle crash data from 1999 and 2002, where belt use rates approximate estimates associated with repeal of primary and secondary seatbelt laws. Proportional rates were applied to the most recent year of crash data (2011) to estimate changes in statewide fatalities and non-fatal injuries. National cost estimates were applied to injury data to calculate associated economic cost. Results: Full repeal of the seatbelt law is estimated to result in an additional 163 fatalities, 13,722 non-fatal injuries and an associated societal cost of $1.6 billion annually. Repeal of the primary seatbelt law only is estimated to result in an additional 95 fatalities, 9,156 non-fatal injuries and an associated societal cost of $1.0 billion annually. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that repealing the either the primary or full seatbelt law would have a substantial and negative impact on public health, increasing motor vehicle crash related fatality, non-fatal injury and associated economic costs.
    Traffic Injury Prevention 11/2013; 15(7). DOI:10.1080/15389588.2013.865167 · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: We examined associations between adolescents' safety belt use and sexual orientation identity. Methods: We pooled data from the 2005 and 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (n = 26,468 weighted; mean age = 15.9 years; 35.4% White, 24.7% Black, 23.5% Latino, 16.4% other). We compared lesbian and gay (1.2%), bisexual (3.5%), and unsure (2.6%) youths with heterosexuals (92.7%) on a binary indicator of passenger safety belt use. We stratified weighted multivariable logistic regression models by sex and adjusted for survey wave and sampling design. Results: Overall, 12.6% of high school students reported "rarely" or "never" wearing safety belts. Sexual minority youths had increased odds of reporting nonuse relative to heterosexuals (48% higher for male bisexuals, 85% for lesbians, 46% for female bisexuals, and 51% for female unsure youths; P < .05), after adjustment for demographic (age, race/ethnicity), individual (body mass index, depression, bullying, binge drinking, riding with a drunk driver, academic achievement), and contextual (living in jurisdictions with secondary or primary safety belt laws, percentage below poverty, percentage same-sex households) risk factors. Conclusions: Public health interventions should address sexual orientation identity disparities in safety belt use.
    American Journal of Public Health 12/2013; 104(2). DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301745 · 4.55 Impact Factor
Show more