Safety belt laws and disparities in safety belt use among US high-school drivers.

Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, Center for Health Initiatives, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 3.93). 04/2012; 102(6):1128-34. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300493
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We compared reported safety belt use, for both drivers and passengers, among teenagers with learner's permits, provisional licenses, and unrestricted licenses in states with primary or secondary enforcement of safety belt laws.
Our data source was the 2006 National Young Driver Survey, which included a national representative sample of 3126 high-school drivers. We used multivariate, log-linear regression analyses to assess associations between safety belt laws and belt use.
Teenaged drivers were 12% less likely to wear a safety belt as drivers and 15% less likely to wear one as passengers in states with a secondary safety belt law than in states with a primary law. The apparent reduction in belt use among teenagers as they progressed from learner to unrestricted license holder occurred in only secondary enforcement states. Groups reporting particularly low use included African American drivers, rural residents, academically challenged students, and those driving pickup trucks.
The results provided further evidence for enactment of primary enforcement provisions in safety belt laws because primary laws are associated with higher safety belt use rates and lower crash-related injuries and mortality.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives. We examined associations between adolescents' safety belt use and sexual orientation identity. Methods. We pooled data from the 2005 and 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (n = 26 468 weighted; mean age = 15.9 years; 35.4% White, 24.7% Black, 23.5% Latino, 16.4% other). We compared lesbian and gay (1.2%), bisexual (3.5%), and unsure (2.6%) youths with heterosexuals (92.7%) on a binary indicator of passenger safety belt use. We stratified weighted multivariable logistic regression models by sex and adjusted for survey wave and sampling design. Results. Overall, 12.6% of high school students reported "rarely" or "never" wearing safety belts. Sexual minority youths had increased odds of reporting nonuse relative to heterosexuals (48% higher for male bisexuals, 85% for lesbians, 46% for female bisexuals, and 51% for female unsure youths; P < .05), after adjustment for demographic (age, race/ethnicity), individual (body mass index, depression, bullying, binge drinking, riding with a drunk driver, academic achievement), and contextual (living in jurisdictions with secondary or primary safety belt laws, percentage below poverty, percentage same-sex households) risk factors. Conclusions. Public health interventions should address sexual orientation identity disparities in safety belt use. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print December 12, 2013: e1-e8. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301745).
    American Journal of Public Health 12/2013; · 3.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adolescence and young adulthood are unique developmental periods that present opportunities and challenges for improving health. Health at this age can affect health throughout the lifespan. This review has two aims: (1) to examine trends in key indicators in outcomes, behaviors, and health care over the past decade for U.S. adolescents and young adults; and (2) to compare U.S. adolescents and young adults on these indicators. The review also assesses sociodemographic differences in trends and current indicators. Guided by our aims, previous reviews, and national priorities, the present review identified 21 sources of nationally representative data to examine trends in 53 areas and comparisons of adolescents and young adults in 42 areas. Most health and health care indicators have changed little over the past decade. Encouraging exceptions were found for adolescents and young adults in unintentional injury, assault, and tobacco use, and, for adolescents, in sexual/reproductive health. Trends in violence and chronic disease and related behaviors were mixed. Review of current indicators demonstrates that young adulthood continues to entail greater risk and worse outcomes than adolescence. Young adults fared worse on about two-thirds of the indicators examined. Differences among sociodemographic subgroups persisted for both trends and current indicators.
    Journal of Adolescent Health 05/2014; · 2.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT Background: Seatbelts are the most effective method of decreasing fatal and non-fatal motor vehicle crash injury. Advocacy groups have recently been successful enacting repeals of mandatory motorcycle helmet laws in several states. In some states, this has prompted renewed efforts aimed at repealing mandatory seatbelt laws. Purpose: To evaluate and quantify the potential impact of rescinding seatbelt laws on annual crash related fatalities, non-fatal injuries and associated economic costs, using Michigan as a model, to inform the national debate. Methods: Proportional injury rates were calculated utilizing police-reported statewide passenger vehicle crash data from 1999 and 2002, where belt use rates approximate estimates associated with repeal of primary and secondary seatbelt laws. Proportional rates were applied to the most recent year of crash data (2011) to estimate changes in statewide fatalities and non-fatal injuries. National cost estimates were applied to injury data to calculate associated economic cost. Results: Full repeal of the seatbelt law is estimated to result in an additional 163 fatalities, 13,722 non-fatal injuries and an associated societal cost of $1.6 billion annually. Repeal of the primary seatbelt law only is estimated to result in an additional 95 fatalities, 9,156 non-fatal injuries and an associated societal cost of $1.0 billion annually. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that repealing the either the primary or full seatbelt law would have a substantial and negative impact on public health, increasing motor vehicle crash related fatality, non-fatal injury and associated economic costs.
    Traffic injury prevention 11/2013;