Optical quality for keratoconic eyes with conventional RGP lens and simulated, customised contact lens corrections: A comparison

Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (Impact Factor: 2.18). 05/2012; 32(3):200-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00904.x
Source: PubMed


To compare monochromatic aberrations of keratoconic eyes when uncorrected, corrected with spherically-powered RGP (rigid gas-permeable) contact lenses and corrected using simulations of customised soft contact lenses for different magnitudes of rotation (up to 15°) and translation (up to 1mm) from their ideal position.
The ocular aberrations of examples of mild, moderate and severe keratoconic eyes were measured when uncorrected and when wearing their habitual RGP lenses. Residual aberrations and point-spread functions of each eye were simulated using an ideal, customised soft contact lens (designed to neutralise higher-order aberrations, HOA) were calculated as a function of the angle of rotation of the lens from its ideal orientation, and its horizontal and vertical translation.
In agreement with the results of other authors, the RGP lenses markedly reduced both lower-order aberrations and HOA for all three patients. When compared with the RGP lens corrections, the customised lens simulations only provided optical improvements if their movements were constrained within limits which appear to be difficult to achieve with current technologies.
At the present time, customised contact lens corrections appear likely to offer, at best, only minor optical improvements over RGP lenses for patients with keratoconus. If made in soft materials, however, these lenses may be preferred by patients in term of comfort.

Download full-text


Available from: Amit Jinabhai, Oct 06, 2015
1 Follower
56 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies in the field of cataract and refractive surgery often report only summary wave-front analysis data - data that are too condensed to allow for a retrospective calculation of metrics relevant to visual perception. The aim of this study was to develop a tool that can be used to estimate these metrics from summary wave-front analysis data. The core of the tool is a two-parameter (primary spherical aberration and an overall measure of all other higher-order aberrations) model for the statistical description of the optical aberrations of the human eye. Modulation transfer through-focus curves were calculated for realistic ranges of spherical aberration, other higher-order aberrations and pupil diameters, for both white and monochromatic light. A series of commonly used metrics (modulation transfer, Strehl ratio, visual Strehl ratio and width of line spread function) was derived from these through-focus curves, with corresponding location of optimal focus and depth-of-focus. Published wave-front analysis data from healthy subjects served as input for the tool. The output was compared to published measurements of the included metrics, performed in the same or in comparable samples. Agreement between output of the tool and measurements was within the accuracy of the data. The tool is able to relate accurately summary wave-front analysis data from groups of patients to metrics relevant to visual perception and can thus be used to estimate these metrics in situations where their calculation from raw wave-front analysis data is not possible.
    Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 01/2013; 33(1):35-41. DOI:10.1111/opo.12005 · 2.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    01/2013; 2(1):1-11. DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1040
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dynamic registration uncertainty of a wavefront-guided correction with respect to underlying wavefront error (WFE) inevitably decreases retinal image quality. A partial correction may improve average retinal image quality and visual acuity in the presence of registration uncertainties. The purpose of this paper is to (a) develop an algorithm to optimize wavefront-guided correction that improves visual acuity given registration uncertainty and (b) test the hypothesis that these corrections provide improved visual performance in the presence of these uncertainties as compared to a full-magnitude correction or a correction by Guirao, Cox, and Williams (2002). A stochastic parallel gradient descent (SPGD) algorithm was used to optimize the partial-magnitude correction for three keratoconic eyes based on measured scleral contact lens movement. Given its high correlation with logMAR acuity, the retinal image quality metric log visual Strehl was used as a predictor of visual acuity. Predicted values of visual acuity with the optimized corrections were validated by regressing measured acuity loss against predicted loss. Measured loss was obtained from normal subjects viewing acuity charts that were degraded by the residual aberrations generated by the movement of the full-magnitude correction, the correction by Guirao, and optimized SPGD correction. Partial-magnitude corrections optimized with an SPGD algorithm provide at least one line improvement of average visual acuity over the full magnitude and the correction by Guirao given the registration uncertainty. This study demonstrates that it is possible to improve the average visual acuity by optimizing wavefront-guided correction in the presence of registration uncertainty.
    Journal of Vision 06/2013; 13(7). DOI:10.1167/13.7.8 · 2.39 Impact Factor
Show more