Conference Paper

Identification of Actinides Inside Nuclear Waste Packages by Measurement of Fission Delayed Gammas

DRT, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette
DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2006.355994 Conference: Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2006. IEEE, Volume: 2
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT A characterization of the alpha-activity due to the presence of actinides inside nuclear waste packages is necessary to select the best mode of storage. Non-destructive active methods, based on fission process, allow to quantify the global mass of actinides. However, these measurements give no information on the nature of isotopes in most cases. We are currently developing a method to identify actinides (235U, 238U, 239Pu), based on the detection of delayed gammas emitted by fission products. The delayed gamma spectrum can be regarded as a "fingerprint" of the irradiated sample. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of peaks allow an identification of actinides. The main purpose of this paper is twofold. First, basis of this method of differentiation are described. Then, experimental results obtained in fission and photofission are presented, in particular in the case of mixtures containing several actinides.

0 Followers
 · 
75 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The cleaning up and dismantling of nuclear facilities lead to a great volume of technological radioactive wastes which need to be characterized in order to be sent to the adequate final disposal or interim storage. The control and characterization can be performed with non-destructive nuclear measurements such as gamma-ray spectrometry. Passive neutron counting is an alternative when the alpha-gamma emitters cannot be detected due to the presence of a high gamma emission resulting from fission or activation products, or when the waste matrix is too absorbing for the gamma rays of interest (too dense and/or made of high atomic number elements). It can also be a complement to gamma-ray spectrometry when two measurement results must be confronted to improve the confidence in the activity assessment. Passive neutron assays involve the detection of spontaneous fission neutrons emitted by even nuclides (238Pu, 240Pu, 242Pu, 242Cm, 244Cm…) and neutrons resulting from (α, n) reactions with light nuclides (O, F, Be…). The latter is conditioned by the presence of high α-activity radionuclides (234U, 238Pu, 240Pu, 241Am…) and low-Z elements, which depends on the chemical form (metallic, oxide or fluorine) of the plutonium or uranium contaminant. This paper presents the recent application of passive neutron methods to the cleaning up of a nuclear facility located at CEA Cadarache (France), which concerns the Pu mass assessment of 2714 historic, 100 litre radioactive waste drums produced between 1980 and 1997. Another application is the dismantling and decommissioning of an uranium enrichment facility for military purposes, which involves the 235U and total uranium quantifications in about a thousand, large compressors employed in the gaseous diffusion enrichment process.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The detection and identification of delayed fission γγ-rays emitted between intense bremsstrahlung pulses was investigated as a method to discriminate between fissionable and non-fissionable materials. Photofission and other photonuclear reactions were induced in U238, Pb, Fe and Be targets using a pulsed bremsstrahlung beam for several endpoint energies between 88 and 20MeV. In the 33ms between irradiating pulses, correlated photon energy and time spectra were collected using a high-purity germanium detector. When non-fissionable materials were irradiated, the high-energy γγ-ray yield decreased a couple orders of magnitude within the first ∼12ms after the pulse. In contrast, the high-energy γγ-rays emitted from the decay of fission fragments were nearly constant throughout the period between bremsstrahlung pulses. Hence, a basic energy and time discrimination provides a unique high-energy delayed γγ-ray signature for fissionable material detection.
    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment 07/2009; 606(3):811–815. DOI:10.1016/j.nima.2009.04.048 · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper deals with the application of non-destructive neutron measurement methods to control and characterize 200l radioactive waste drums filled with a concrete matrix. Due to its composition, and particularly to hydrogen, concrete penalizes the use of such methods to quantify uranium (U) and plutonium (Pu) components, which are mainly responsible of the α-activity of the waste. The determination of the alpha activity is the main objective of neutron measurements, in view to verify acceptance criteria in surface storage. Calibration experiments of the Active Neutron Interrogation (ANI) method lead to Detection Limit Masses (DLM) of about 1mg of 239Pueff in the total counting mode, and of about 10mg of 239Pueff in the coincidence counting mode, in case of a homogeneous Pu source and measurement times between one and two hours. Monte Carlo calculation results show a very satisfactory agreement between experimental values and calculated ones. Results of the application of passive and active neutron methods to control two real drums are presented in the last part of the paper. They show a good agreement between measured data and values declared by the waste producers. The main difficulties that had to be overcome are the low neutron signal in passive and active coincidence counting modes due to concrete, the analysis of the passive neutron signal in presence of 244Cm in the drum, which is a strong spontaneous fission neutron emitter, the variation of the active background with the concrete composition, and the analysis of the active prompt neutron signal due to the simultaneous presence of U and Pu in the drums.
    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 09/2011; 269(18):1956-1962. DOI:10.1016/j.nimb.2011.05.024 · 1.19 Impact Factor