Conference Paper

Active Vibration Control of Aerospace Structures Using a Modified Positive Position Feedback Method

Center for Vehicle Syst. & Safety, Virginia Tech., Blacksburg, VA, USA
DOI: 10.1109/ACC.2009.5159955 Conference: American Control Conference, 2009. ACC '09.
Source: IEEE Xplore


A positive position feedback controller is modified and a new active vibration control technique is developed. Unlike the conventional positive position feedback, the new controller separates the damping and stiffness control using two parallel first order and second order compensators. The second order compensator has a damping ratio as low as the damping of flexible structure to provide periodic vibration control. Simultaneously, the high damping is made available through a first order compensator. The new controller is applicable to a strain-based sensing/actuating approach and can be extensively applied to piezoelectrically controlled systems. Control gains are obtained by performing the stability analysis. The controller is verified experimentally using a plate vibration suppression setup. The plate is controlled through two piezoelectric patches and its vibrations are monitored by ten sensors mounted on the surface of the plate. The results confirm that the new controller is able to provide good vibration reduction, with the ability to be used to simultaneously control more than one natural frequency.

Download full-text


Available from: Mehdi Ahmadian, Oct 10, 2015
83 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Theoretical and experimental results of the modeling and control of a flexible ribbed antenna are presented. The antenna consists of eight flexible ribs that constitute an active antenna in the sense that the actuators and sensors are an integral part of the structure. The antenna exhibits closely spaced and repeated modes, thus multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) control is necessary for controllability and observability of the structure. The structure also exhibits a mode localization phenomenon and contains postbuckled members making an accurate finite element model of the structure difficult to obtain. An identified MIMO minimum-order model of the antenna is synthesized from identified single-input, single-output transfer functions curve fit in the frequency domain. The identified model is used to design a positive position feedback and H(sub infinity) controller that increases damping in all of the modes in the targeted frequency range. Because of the accuracy of the open-loop model of the antenna, the closed-loop response predicted by the identified model correlates well with experimental results.
    Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics 03/1995; 18(2):340-346. DOI:10.2514/3.21389 · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nanomechanical cantilever sensors (NMCSs) have recently emerged as an effective means for label-free chemical and biological species detection. They operate through the adsorption of species on the functionalized surface of mechanical cantilevers. Through this functionalization, molecular recognition is directly transduced into a micromechanical response. In order to effectively utilize these sensors in practice and correctly relate the micromechanical response to the associated adsorbed species, the chief technical issues related to modeling must be resolved. Along these lines, this paper presents a general nonlinear-comprehensive modeling framework for piezoelectrically actuated microcantilevers and validates it experimentally. The proposed model considers both longitudinal and flexural vibrations and their coupling in addition to the ever-present geometric and material nonlinearities. Utilizing Euler-Bernoulli beam theory and employing the inextensibility conditions, the coupled longitudinal-flexural equations of motion are reduced to one nonlinear partial differential equation describing the flexural vibrations of the sensor. Using a Galerkian expansion, the resulting equation is discretized into a set of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The method of multiple scales is then implemented to analytically construct the nonlinear response of the sensor near the first modal frequency (primary resonance of the first vibration mode). These solutions are compared to experimental results demonstrating that the sensor exhibits a softening-type nonlinear response. Such behavior can be attributed to the presence of quadratic material nonlinearities in the piezoelectric layer. This observation is critical, as it suggests that unlike macrocantilevers where the geometric hardening nonlinearities dominate the response behavior, material nonlinearities dominate the response of microcantilevers yielding a softening-type response. This behavior should be accounted for wh- en designing and employing such sensors for practical applications.
    IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 03/2008; 13(1-13):58 - 65. DOI:10.1109/TMECH.2008.915823 · 3.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new technique for vibration suppression in large space structures is investigated in laboratory experiments on a thin cantilever beam. The technique, called Positive Position Feedback (PPF), makes use of generalized displacement measurements to accomplish vibration suppression. Several features of Positive Position Feedback make it attractive for the large space structure control environment. The realization of the controller is simple and straightforward. Global stability conditions can be derived which are independent of the dynamical characteristics of the structure being controlled, i.e., all spillover is stabilizing. Furthermore, the method can be made insensitive to finite actuator dynamics, and is amenable to a strain-based sensing approach. The experiments described here control the first six bending modes of a cantilever beam, and make use of piezoelectric materials for actuators and sensors, simulating a piezoelectric active-member. Modal damping ratios as high as 20% of critical are achieved.
    AIAA Journal 05/1990; 28(4). DOI:10.2514/3.10451 · 1.21 Impact Factor
Show more