Suppressed conductance in a metallic graphene nanojunction

National Laboratory of Superhard Materials, Department of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130023, China
Journal of Applied Physics (Impact Factor: 2.19). 02/2009; 105(1):013703 - 013703-6. DOI: 10.1063/1.3054449
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT The linear conductance spectrum of a metallic graphene junction formed by interconnecting two gapless graphene nanoribbons is calculated. A strong conductance suppression appears in the vicinity of the Dirac point. We found that such a conductance suppression arises from the antiresonance effect associated with an edge state localized at the zigzag-edged shoulder of the junction. The conductance valley due to the antiresonance is rather robust in the presence of the impurity and vacancy scattering. Also the center of the conductance valley can be readily tuned by an electric field exerted on the wider nanoribbon.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The transport properties of graphene T-type structure (GTS), both armchair-edged and zigzag-edged, are studied systematically within Landauer formalism in terms of tight binding Green's function method. For armchair-edged GTS (AGTS), a phase diagram of conductance in parameter space of Fermi energy and the stub width is presented. When a gate voltage is applied in the stub, a perfect linear dependence of the gap position shift of conductance on the gate voltage is found. The origin of the conductance gap as well as such linear behavior is explained. For the zigzag-edged GTS (ZGTS), it is found that the dependence of the transport properties on the stub height can be classified into two groups that tightly depend on whether the stub width equals 3n-1 or not.
    Modern Physics Letters B 11/2011; 24(12). DOI:10.1142/S0217984910023293 · 0.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Graphene nanopores (GNPs) hold great promise as sensors for biological and chemical sensing applications because of their potential in achieving ultra-high sensitivity and sizeable operating currents. However, it remains a challenging task to realize the full potential of GNP sensors in real biological and chemical environment because of strong noise and interference. Here we propose a new GNP based sensor that consists of two conduction units. Due to the opening of additional conductive channels and enhanced transmission pathways around the nanopore, the proposed gapped-GNP structure is shown to operate with significantly improved conductivity and sensitivity over standard GNPs. The proposed device shows promise in dealing with noise and interference observed in practice.
    Applied Physics Letters 07/2014; 105(3):033104-033104-5. DOI:10.1063/1.4890414 · 3.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Graphene holds great promise for replacing conventional Si material in field effect transistors (FETs) due to its high carrier mobility. Previously proposed graphene FETs either suffer from low ON-state current resulting from constrained channel width or require complex fabrication processes for edge-defecting or doping. Here, we propose an alternative graphene FET structure created on intrinsic metallic armchair-edged graphene nanoribbons with uniform width, where the channel region is made semiconducting by drilling a pore in the interior, and the two ends of the nanoribbon act naturally as connecting electrodes. The proposed GNP-FETs have high ON-state currents due to seamless atomic interface between the channel and electrodes and are able to be created with arbitrarily wide ribbons. In addition, the performance of GNP-FETs can be tuned by varying pore size and ribbon width. As a result, their performance and fabrication process are more predictable and controllable in comparison to schemes based on edge-defects and doping. Using first-principle transport calculations, we show that GNP-FETs can achieve competitive leakage current of ∼70 pA, subthreshold swing of ∼60 mV/decade, and significantly improved On/Off current ratios on the order of 105 as compared with other forms of graphene FETs.
    Journal of Applied Physics 07/2014; 116(2):023709-023709-4. DOI:10.1063/1.4889755 · 2.19 Impact Factor


Available from