Conference Paper

PinUP: Pinning User Files to Known Applications

Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Eng., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA
DOI: 10.1109/ACSAC.2008.41 Conference: Computer Security Applications Conference, 2008. ACSAC 2008. Annual
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT Users commonly download, patch, and use applications such as email clients, office applications, and media-players from the Internet. Such applications are run with the user's full permissions. Because system protections do not differentiate applications, any malcode present in the downloaded software can compromise or otherwise leak all user data. Interestingly, our investigations indicate that common applications often adhere to recognizable workflows on user data. In this paper, we take advantage of this reality by developing protection mechanisms that "pin'' user files to the applications that may use them. These mechanisms restrict access to user data to explicitly stated workflows--thus preventing malcode from exploiting user data not associated with that application. We describe our implementation of PinUP on the Linux Security Modules framework, explore its performance, and study several practical use cases. Through these activities, we show that user data can be protected from untrusted applications while retaining the ability to receive the benefits of those applications.

0 Followers
 · 
187 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Models based on system calls are a popular and common approach to characterize the run-time behavior of programs. For example, system calls are used by intrusion detection systems to detect software exploits. As another example, policies based on system calls are used to sandbox applications or to enforce access control. Given that malware represents a significant security threat for today's computing infrastructure, it is not surprising that system calls were also proposed to distinguish between benign processes and malicious code. Most proposed malware detectors that use system calls follows program-centric analysis approach. That is, they build models based on specific behaviors of individual applications. Unfortunately, it is not clear how well these models generalize, especially when exposed to a diverse set of previously-unseen, real-world applications that operate on realistic inputs. This is particularly problematic as most previous work has used only a small set of programs to measure their technique's false positive rate. Moreover, these programs were run for a short time, often by the authors themselves. In this paper, we study the diversity of system calls by performing a large-scale collection (compared to previous efforts) of system calls on hosts that run applications for regular users on actual inputs. Our analysis of the data demonstrates that simple malware detectors, such as those based on system call sequences, face significant challenges in such environments. To address the limitations of program-centric approaches, we propose an alternative detection model that characterizes the general interactions between benign programs and the operating system (OS). More precisely, our system-centric approach models the way in which benign programs access OS resources (such as files and registry entries). Our experiments demonstrate that this approach captures well the behavior of benign programs and raises very few (even zero) false positives while being able to detect a significant fraction of today's malware.
    Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2010, Chicago, Illinois, USA, October 4-8, 2010; 01/2010
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Discretionary Access Control (DAC) is the primary access control mechanism in today’s major operating systems. It is, however, vulnerable to Trojan Horse attacks and attacks exploiting buggy software. We propose to combine the discretionary policy in DAC with the dynamic information flow techniques in MAC, therefore achieving the best of both worlds, that is, the DAC’s easy-to-use discretionary policy specification and MAC’s defense against threats caused by Trojan Horses and buggy programs. We propose the Information Flow Enhanced Discretionary Access Control (IFEDAC) model that implements this design philosophy. We describe our design of IFEDAC, and discuss its relationship with the Usable Mandatory Integrity Protection (UMIP) model proposed earlier by us. In addition, we analyze their security property and their relationships with other protection systems. We also describe our implementations of IFEDAC in Linux and the evaluation results and deployment experiences of the systems.
    ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 11/2011; 14:24. DOI:10.1145/2043621.2043624 · 0.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present a new technique that can trace data provenance and enforce data access policies across multiple applications and machines. We have developed Garm, a tool that uses binary rewriting to implement this technique on arbitrary binaries. Users can use Garm to attach access policies to data and Garm enforces the policy on all accesses to the data (and any derived data) across all applications and executions. Garm uses static analysis to generate optimized instrumentation that traces the provenance of an application's state and the policies that apply to this state. Garm monitors the interactions of the application with the underlying operating system to enforce policies. Conceptually, Garm combines trusted computing support from the underlying operating system with a stream cipher to ensure that data protected by an access policy cannot be accessed outside of Garm's policy enforcement mechanisms. We have evaluated Garm with several common Linux applications. We found that Garm can successfully trace the provenance of data across executions of multiple applications and enforce data access policies on the application's executions.
    ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 05/2011; 14:6. DOI:10.1145/1952982.1952988 · 0.86 Impact Factor

Preview (3 Sources)

Download
0 Downloads
Available from