Conference Paper

Sustainable (re-) configurable solutions for the high volume SoC market

FTM, STMicroelectronics, Agrate Brianza
DOI: 10.1109/IPDPS.2008.4536541 Conference: Parallel and Distributed Processing, 2008. IPDPS 2008. IEEE International Symposium on
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT The application of embedded run-time configurable architectures to System-on-chip design has long been considered a possible major enabling factor, especially in the direction of lowering time-to-market of new products as well as mitigating NRE costs related to verification, bug-fixes and product upgrades. In fact, while achieving significant success in specific application fields, reconfigurable computing has so far mostly failed to reach the high-volume application specific standard products (ASSP) that both in terms of volumes and revenues represent the largest share of today's SoC market. This is essentially due to the area overhead induced by these solutions with respect to standard ASIC design styles, which is unaffordable for the low margins that characterize this specific product class. In this paper, the exploitation of mask-programmable hardware technologies for deploying high volume ASSP is evaluated as a possible mitigation factor to the above discussed issues. The paper provides an introduction to mask-programmable technologies as well as an overview and a classification of most significant available trends and solutions in the field. In particular, the application of mask-level programmability in the context of the most significant trends in reconfigurable architectures is thoroughly discussed. In the authors' opinion it is both useful and necessary to capitalize on and exploit the valuable legacy created by 10 years of exploration of reconfigurable architectures in the context of the new possibilities offered by the emergence of mask-programmable options as a significant factor in SoC design.

2 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While advances in semiconductor technologies have pushed achievable scale and performance to phenomenal limits for ICs, nanoscale physical realities dictate IC production based on what we can afford. We believe that IC design and manufacturing can be made more affordable, and reliable, by removing some design and implementation flexibility and enforcing new forms of design regularity. This paper discusses some of the trade-offs to consider for determination of how much regularity a particular IC or application can afford. A Via Patterned Gate Array is proposed as one such example that trades performance for cost by way of new forms of design regularity.
    Proceedings of the 40th Design Automation Conference, DAC 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA, June 2-6, 2003; 01/2003
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paper surveys a decade of R&D on coarse grain reconfigurable hardware and related CAD, points out why this emerging discipline is heading toward a dichotomy of computing science, and advocates the introduction of a new soft machine paradigm to replace CAD by compilation
    Design, Automation and Test in Europe, 2001. Conference and Exhibition 2001. Proceedings; 02/2001
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In recent times there has been a substantial increase in the cost and complexity of fabricating a VLSI chip. The lithography masks themselves can cost between ε and ≥. It is conjectured that due to these increasing costs, the number of ASIC starts in the last few years has declined. We address this problem by using an array of dynamic PLAs which require only metal and via mask customization in order to implement a new design. This would allow several similar-sized designs to share the same base set of masks (right up to the metal layers) and only have different metal and via masks. We have implemented our methodology for both combinational and sequential designs, and demonstrate that our approach strikes a reasonable compromise between ASIC and field programmable design methodologies in terms of placed-and-routed area and delay. Our method has a 2.89× (3.58×) delay overhead and a 4.96× (3.44×) area overhead compared to standard cells for combinational (sequential) designs.
    2004 International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD'04), November 7-11, 2004, San Jose, CA, USA; 01/2004
Show more