A Mid-Cretaceous Origin of Sociality in Xylocopine Bees with Only Two Origins of True Worker Castes Indicates Severe Barriers to Eusociality

School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 04/2012; 7(4):e34690. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034690
Source: PubMed


The origin of sterile worker castes, resulting in eusociality, represents one of the major evolutionary transitions in the history of life. Understanding how eusociality has evolved is therefore an important issue for understanding life on earth. Here we show that in the large bee subfamily Xylocopinae, a simple form of sociality was present in the ancestral lineage and there have been at least four reversions to purely solitary nesting. The ancestral form of sociality did not involve morphological worker castes and maximum colony sizes were very small. True worker castes, entailing a life-time commitment to non-reproductive roles, have evolved only twice, and only one of these resulted in discrete queen-worker morphologies. Our results indicate extremely high barriers to the evolution of eusociality. Its origins are likely to have required very unusual life-history and ecological circumstances, rather than the amount of time that selection can operate on more simple forms of sociality.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael Philip Schwarz,
  • Source
    • "Presocial taxa are fundamental to understanding the origins of sociality and can give insights into the evolutionary steps from solitary to social life. The Xylocopinae are a monophyletic grouping of xylophilous bees consisting of four tribes: Xylocopini, Manueliini, Allodapini and Ceratinini (Rehan et al. 2012). Xylocopini have shown that species display parasociality but never exhibit eusociality (Michener 1990). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Small carpenter bees (Ceratinini) are a key taxon to understanding the transition from subsocial to social behaviour, as all documented groups are long-lived and tend to their young periodically throughout development, though the behaviour of multiple lineages is little known. This study provides the first evidence for social nesting in three Neotropical species of Ceratina (Ceratinula) from Panama. Social nesting was associated with nest reuse, consistent with the hypothesis of kin associations, and the proportion of nests (per species) that displayed sociality was as follows: C. buscki 5 %; C. rectangulifera 0 %; C. tricolor 6 %; and C. zeteki 23 %. Sociality is always a low-frequency phenomenon in ceratinine bee populations, and generally represents a third or less of the population. The fact that the majority of colonies remain solitary indicates that solitary nesting is adaptive in the studied species. © 2015, International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI).
    Insectes Sociaux 11/2015; 62(4). DOI:10.1007/s00040-015-0425-3 · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, transitions from socially hierarchical to more or less egalitarian societies have also been inferred in multiple lineages (e.g. Danforth and Ji 2001; Rehan et al. 2012; Gibbs et al. 2012). Gibbs et al. (2012) proposed that communal nesting in Australian halictines is derived from an ancestral eusocial state and that communal behaviour in a Patellapis species (Timmermann and Kuhlmann 2008) and in Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi (Wcislo et al. 1993) may also be derived from eusocial ancestors. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Communal behaviour is a form of social behaviour where two or more females nest together and have no reproductive hierarchies. Communal behaviour has often been regarded as an evolutionary ‘stepping stone’ to more complex forms of sociality involving castes, as well as a social form derived from solitary behaviour with no further evolution towards eusociality. However, recent phylogenetic studies on halictine bees suggest that some instances of communal behaviour are derived from eusociality. Here, we describe social nesting in an allodapine bee, Braunsapis puangensis, which has been introduced to Fiji from southern Asia. We show that this bee has a casteless form of sociality similar to communal organization, but which has been derived from an ancestrally hierarchical social system. This is likely due to a combination of small benefits for social nesting that rapidly saturate as colonies become larger, along with low costs for dispersal. We suggest that casteless forms of sociality have frequently evolved from hierarchical societies across many insect groups, but the analyses required for recognizing such societies are often undeveloped and hampers comparative approaches. Transitions from hierarchical to casteless societies challenge the notion that eusociality is an evolutionary ‘end point’ and we argue that eusociality can, in some cases, be regarded as an evolutionary step towards egalitarian societies. We also suggest that evolutionary periods involving reproductive hierarchies could select for traits that allow individuals to better assess their social environment and subsequently enable lower reproductive skew.
    Insectes Sociaux 09/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00040-015-0436-0 · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Facultatively social bees have been rarely studied by neuroecologists but offer great insights into the relative roles of phylogenetic history and social experience on brain investment and development pathways. Ceratina are an emerging model system for understanding the evolutionary development of neuroanatomy and social complexity as species of this genus range the full solitary to eusocial spectrum [Michener, 1985; Rehan et al., 2012]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In social insects, both task performance (foraging) and dominance are associated with increased brain investment, particularly in the mushroom bodies. Whether and how these factors interact is unknown. Here we present data on a system where task performance and social behavior can be analyzed simultaneously: the small carpenter bee Ceratina australensis. We show that foraging and dominance have separate and combined cumulative effects on mushroom body calyx investment. Female C. australensis nest solitarily and socially in the same populations at the same time. Social colonies comprise two sisters: the social primary, which monopolizes foraging and reproduction, and the social secondary, which is neither a forager nor reproductive but rather remains at the nest as a guard. We compare the brains of solitary females that forage and reproduce but do not engage in social interactions with those of social individuals while controlling for age, reproductive status, and foraging experience. Mushroom body calyx volume was positively correlated with wing wear, a proxy for foraging experience. We also found that, although total brain volume did not vary among reproductive strategies (solitary vs. social nesters), socially dominant primaries had larger mushroom body calyx volumes (corrected for both brain and body size variation) than solitary females; socially subordinate secondaries (that are neither dominant nor foragers) had the least-developed mushroom body calyces. These data demonstrate that sociality itself does not explain mushroom body volume; however, achieving and maintaining dominance status in a group was associated with mushroom body calyx enlargement. Dominance and foraging effects were cumulative; dominant social primary foragers had larger mushroom body volumes than solitary foragers, and solitary foragers had larger mushroom body volumes than nonforaging social secondary guards. This is the first evidence for cumulative effects on brain development by dominance and task performance. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    Brain Behavior and Evolution 04/2015; 85(2). DOI:10.1159/000381414 · 2.01 Impact Factor
Show more