Article

Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With vs Without Bevacizumab in Older Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Center for Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 04/2012; 307(15):1593-601. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.454
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A previous randomized trial demonstrated that adding bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel improved survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, longer survival was not observed in the subgroup of patients aged 65 years or older.
To examine whether adding bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in older patients with NSCLC.
Retrospective cohort study of 4168 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with stage IIIB or stage IV non-squamous cell NSCLC diagnosed in 2002-2007 in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) region. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts based on diagnosis year and type of initial chemotherapy administered within 4 months of diagnosis: (1) diagnosis in 2006-2007 and bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel therapy; (2) diagnosis in 2006-2007 and carboplatin-paclitaxel therapy; or (3) diagnosis in 2002-2005 and carboplatin-paclitaxel therapy. The associations between carboplatin-paclitaxel with vs without bevacizumab and overall survival were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score analyses including information about patient characteristics recorded in SEER-Medicare.
Overall survival measured from the first date of chemotherapy treatment until death or the censoring date of December 31, 2009.
The median survival estimates were 9.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 4.4-18.6) months for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel, 8.9 (IQR, 3.5-19.3) months for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2006-2007, and 8.0 (IQR, 3.7-17.2) months for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2002-2005. One-year survival probabilities were 39.6% (95% CI, 34.6%-45.4%) for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel vs 40.1% (95% CI, 37.4%-43.0%) for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2006-2007 and 35.6% (95% CI, 33.8%-37.5%) for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2002-2005. Neither multivariable nor propensity score-adjusted Cox models demonstrated a survival advantage for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel cohorts. In propensity score-stratified models, the hazard ratio for overall survival for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2006-2007 was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.89-1.16; P = .85) and compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2002-2005 was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.83-1.06; P = .28). The propensity score-weighted model and propensity score-matching model similarly failed to demonstrate a statistically significant superiority for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses for key variables did not change these findings.
Adding bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy was not associated with better survival among Medicare patients with advanced NSCLC.

0 Followers
 · 
128 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective The use of bevacizumab in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial among elderly patients. This study aimed to compare overall survival for Medicare patients diagnosed with NSCLC and treated with either first-line bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (BCP) or carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP). Methods Patients ≥65 years old, first diagnosed with nonsquamous NSCLC stage IIIB/IV between 2006 and 2009, and treated with either first-line BCP or CP, were selected from the SEER-Medicare database that links cancer registry and US Medicare claims data. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the effect of BCP versus CP on the hazard of death. Age-stratified analyses were conducted for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 years. Results Of 1,706 patients in the study sample, 592 (34.7%) received BCP and 1,114 (65.3%) received CP; 692 (40.6%) were ≥75 years. Adjusted median survival time in the BCP versus CP cohorts was 10.5 versus 8.5 months (p = 0.008). The difference in median survival favoring the BCP cohort was statistically significant for both patients aged ≥75 years (2.7 months, p = 0.019), and patients aged 65-74 years (1.5 months, p = 0.018). The adjusted hazard of death did not differ between the cohorts (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86 - 1.06); however, during the first year of follow-up, when most deaths (>60%) occurred, the hazard of death was 18% lower for the BCP cohort (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71–0.94). BCP patients also had 18% fewer hospital admissions than CP patients (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.94) and 23% fewer inpatient days (IRR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65 - 0.91). Conclusions In this retrospective analysis of Medicare patients in the SEER database, first-line therapy with BCP was associated with longer survival and fewer hospitalizations than CP.
    Lung Cancer 12/2014; 86(3). DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.09.017 · 3.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of metronomic vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 41 patients with inoperable stage IIIb or stage IV NSCLC (14 with adenocarcinomas, 19 with squamous cell carcinoma and eight with other types), PS = 0-2, were treated with cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) in combination with oral metronomic vinorelbine (60 mg total dose, every other day) in cycles of 21 days. A total of 35 patients who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy were evaluable for toxicity and response. Partial response was achieved in 13 patients (ORR 37.1 %; CI 21.1-53.1 %) and stable disease in 10 (28.6 %). After a median follow-up period of 26.2 months (range 0.5-33.4 months), the median progression-free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival 12.0 months. The 1-year survival rate was 52.6 %. Myelosuppression was the main adverse event with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurring in five (14.3 %) and six (17.1 %) patients, respectively. Three of these patients presented with febrile neutropenia and there was one death due to sepsis. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild. Cisplatin in combination with metronomic vinorelbine is an active, although myelotoxic, therapeutic option in the first-line setting for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, which merits further evaluation in randomized trials.
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 02/2015; 75(4). DOI:10.1007/s00280-015-2707-x · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most developed countries accepted the chronological age of 70years as the definition of "elderly" and there is a general consensus in clinical practice to consider this age as the threshold in risk assessment. This has a strong impact in the choice of treatment of these lung cancer patients. Indeed, more than 50% of these patients are over 70 and nearly 30% are over 75years old. Because of the increasing number of elderly patients that are generally fitter than in the past, the treatment options should rather be based on individual fitness, taking into account risks and benefits of the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. This means considering biological rather than chronological age to make decisions. For these reasons, we developed a simplified short comprehensive geriatric assessment (sCGA), including a standardised evaluation of activity of daily living, depression, cognitive status, comorbidities and geriatric syndromes. This allowed us the classification of these patients into 3 categories: frail, vulnerable and fit. Through the emblematic case of a fit elderly man affected by NSLCC, we present the multidisciplinary assessment and discussions to identify the best treatment options for this patient. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    European Journal of Internal Medicine 10/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ejim.2014.10.024 · 2.30 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
55 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014