Conference Proceeding

Full copper wiring in a sub-0.25 μm CMOS ULSI technology

Semicond. Res. & Dev. Center, IBM Corp., Hopewell Junction, NY
Electron Devices Meeting, 1988. IEDM '88. Technical Digest., International 01/1998; DOI:10.1109/IEDM.1997.650496 In proceeding of: Electron Devices Meeting, 1997. IEDM '97. Technical Digest., International
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT We present the first fully integrated ULSI CMOS/copper
interconnect technology. Up to 6 Cu wiring levels are built at minimum
metal-contacted pitch of 0.63 μm, with W local-interconnect and
contact levels and a polycontacted pitch of 0.81 μm, on a
fully-scaled sub 0.25 μm, 1.8 V CMOS technology. The Cu wiring has
advantages of significantly lower resistance, higher allowed current
density, and increased scalability, relative to comparable Ti/Al(Cu)
wiring. These benefits in turn have enabled the scaling of pitch and
thickness, from reduced-capacitance, high-density lower levels to low RC
global wiring levels, consistent with high-performance and high-density
needs. The integrated Cu hardware was evaluated according to a
comprehensive set of yield, reliability, and stress tests. This included
fully functional, high-density 288 K SRAM chips which were packaged into
product modules and successfully tested for reliability. Overall, we
find the results for full Cu wiring meet or exceed the standards set by
our Al(Cu)/W-stud technology

0 0
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Porous insulators are utilized in the wiring structure of microelectronic devices as a means of reducing, through low dielectric permittivity, power consumption and signal delay in integrated circuits. They are typically based on low density modifications of amorphous SiO2 known as SiCOH or carbon-doped oxides, in which free volume is created through the removal of labile organic phases. Porous dielectrics pose a number of technological challenges related to chemical and mechanical stability, particularly in regard to semiconductor processing methods. This review discusses porous dielectric film preparation techniques, key issues encountered, and mitigation strategies.
    Materials. 01/2010;
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper proposes a wave propagation based approach to derive crosstalk and delay between two coupled RLCG interconnects in the transform domain. The increase of clock frequency into the GHz range, coupled with longer length interconnects of small cross-section and low dielectric strength, can result in cross coupling effects between on-chip interconnects. The traditional analysis of crosstalk in a transmission line begins with a lossless LC representation, yielding a wave equation governing the system response. In order to determine the effects that this cross talk will have on circuit operation, the resulting delays and logic levels for the victim nets must be computed. In this paper, we propose four reflection wave propagation based analytical model for estimation of crosstalk. An emphasis was made on the distributed nature of the RLCG model, thus underlining the effect of parasitic coupling inductance and conductance on present and future on-chip interconnects.
    Semiconductor Electronics (ICSE), 2010 IEEE International Conference on; 07/2010
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electroplated copper films are known to change their microstructure due to the self-annealing effect. The self-annealing effect of electroplated copper films was investigated by measuring the time dependence of the film stress and sheet resistance for different layer thicknesses between 1.5 and 20 ??m. While the sheet resistance was found to decrease as time elapsed, a size-dependent change in film stress was observed. Films with the thickness of 5 ??m and below decrease in stress, while thicker films initially reveal an increase in film stress followed by a stress relaxation at a later stage. This behavior is explained by the superposition of grain growth and grain-size-dependent yielding.
    IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability 04/2010; · 1.52 Impact Factor


Available from