Conference Paper

On the non-robustness of inconsistent quaternion-based attitude control systems using memoryless path-lifting schemes

Robert Bosch Res. & Technol. Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Conference: American Control Conference (ACC), 2011
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT The unit quaternion is a pervasive representation of rigid-body attitude used for the design and analysis of feedback control laws. Quaternion-based feedback control laws that are inconsistent (i.e. do not have a unique value for a given attitude) require an additional mechanism that lifts a continuous attitude trajectory to the unit quaternion space. Lifting mechanisms that are memoryless, for example, selecting the quaternion having positive scalar component, have a limited domain where they remain injective and, when used globally, introduce discontinuities into the closed-loop system. We show that such discontinuities can be exploited by an arbitrarily small measurement disturbance to stabilize attitudes far from the desired attitude and destroy "global" attractivity properties.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
74 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper provides nonlinear tracking control systems for a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that are robust to bounded uncertainties. A mathematical model of a quadrotor UAV is defined on the special Euclidean group, and nonlinear output-tracking controllers are developed to follow (1) an attitude command, and (2) a position command for the vehicle center of mass. The controlled system has the desirable properties that the tracking errors are uniformly ultimately bounded, and the size of the ultimate bound can be arbitrarily reduced by control system parameters. Numerical examples illustrating complex maneuvers are provided.
    Proceedings of the American Control Conference 09/2011;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The unit quaternion is a pervasive representation of rigid-body attitude used for the design and analysis of feedback control laws. Often, quaternion-based feedbacks require an additional mechanism that lifts a continuous attitude path to the unit quaternion space. When this mechanism is memoryless, it has a limited domain where it remains injective and leads to discontinuities when used globally. To remedy this limitation, we propose a hybrid-dynamic algorithm for lifting a continuous attitude path to the unit quaternion space. We show that this hybrid-dynamic mechanism allows us to directly translate quaternion-based controllers and their asymptotic stability properties (obtained in the unit-quaternion space) to the actual rigid-body-attitude space. We also show that when quaternion-based controllers are not designed to account for the double covering of the rigid-body-attitude space by a unit-quaternion parameterization, they can give rise to the unwinding phenomenon, which we characterize in terms of the projection of asymptotically stable sets.
    American Control Conference (ACC), 2011; 08/2011
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The existing attitude controllers (without angular velocity measurements) involve explicitly the orientation (\textit{e.g.,} the unit-quaternion) in the feedback. Unfortunately, there does not exist any sensor that directly measures the orientation of a rigid body, and hence, the attitude must be reconstructed using a set of inertial vector measurements as well as the angular velocity (which is assumed to be unavailable in velocity-free control schemes). To overcome this \textit{circular reasoning}-like problem, we propose a velocity-free attitude stabilization control scheme relying solely on inertial vector measurements. The originality of this control strategy stems from the fact that the reconstruction of the attitude as well as the angular velocity measurements are not required at all. Moreover, as a byproduct of our design approach, the proposed controller does not lead to the unwinding phenomenon encountered in unit-quaternion based attitude controllers.
    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 03/2012; · 2.72 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
1 Download
Available from