Conference Paper

Reactive power management and voltage control of large Transmission System using SVC (Static VAR Compensator)

Comput. Sci. & Eng. Dept., North Carolina A & T State Univ., Greensboro, NC, USA
DOI: 10.1109/SECON.2011.5752911 Conference: Southeastcon, 2011 Proceedings of IEEE, At Nashville, TN, Volume: Southeastcon, 2011 Proceedings of IEEE
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT The role of the transmission network in the Power System is to transmit the power generated in the power plants to the load centers and the interconnected power systems. The transmission of electric power has to take place in the most efficient way in addition to providing flexibility in the process. Flexible A.C. Transmission System (FACTS) promotes the use of static controllers to enhance the controllability and increase the power transfer capability. Providing reactive shunt compensation with shunt-connected capacitors and reactors is a well established technique to get a better voltage profile in a power system. Shunt capacitors are inexpensive but lack dynamic capabilities, thus some form of dynamically controlled reactive power compensation becomes essential. This feature is provided by Static VAR Compensator (SVC). The work presented here also compares SVC with fixed capacitor compensation and documents the superiority of SVC using Computer Simulation and its performance for reactive power management and better voltage control.

5 Followers
 · 
929 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper addresses the switching transients in multi-branch thyristor-switched capacitors (TSC). The current transients following the addition of a branch to a group of already connected ones are analyzed. Expressions for both its fundamental and oscillatory components are given in terms of the power network voltage, frequency, short-circuit level and the switching angle. The relations include also the compensator parameters such as its total reactive power rating, total number of branches, the number of already connected branches and the initial voltage on the capacitor involved in the switching transient. An expression for the distortion of the supply current is also given. A minimization procedure is presented for identifying the optimal switching angle leading to the least magnitude of the oscillatory current. Switching when the instantaneous supply voltage is equal to the initial voltage will result in the least oscillatory current only in the two special cases of a single-branch compensator, or the switching of the first branch of a multi-branch TSC. The effect of both the total number of branches and the branch switching steps on the oscillatory current and on the optimal switching angle is also discussed. The advantage of the suggested procedure is demonstrated by investigating several case studies.
    01/2012; 2012:9 pages. DOI:10.1155/2012/643716
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The negative impact of low power factors on power networks is significant and profound particularly at the distribution level. Inadequate voltage profiles, increased network losses, and the overheating of machines and equipment are some of the well-known side effects. Regulations, financial penalties and incentives, and technical solutions have all been used to improve low power factor levels. In this paper, studies and comparisons among several low power factor penalty schemes are considered leading to the most convenient method to be applied in practice. The study helps with highlighting the factors that highly to be considered when designing such penalties in order to eliminate the wide difference in the adopted low power factor regulations among utilities. The use of excessive reactive power/energy tariff to be the penalty for low power factor customers seems to be the favorable choice for utilities due to its consistency and reliability. This study forms the bases on which the new applied low power factor financial penalties in Saudi Arabia are designed.
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 10/2014; 39(10). DOI:10.1007/s13369-014-1323-0 · 0.37 Impact Factor