Conference Paper

On the Goal Domain in the RM-ODP Enterprise Language: An Initial Appraisal Based on a Foundational Ontology

Comput. Sci. Dept., Fed. Univ. of Espirito Santo (UFES), Vitória, Brazil
DOI: 10.1109/EDOCW.2010.47 Conference: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), 2010 14th IEEE International
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT The “goal domain” addresses objectives in a broad scope ranging from high-level statements expressing the vision and mission of an organization (or community) to declarations of the results that must be achieved by business process execution. This paper reviews the support for the goal domain in ISO RM-ODP. We analyze the conceptualization for goals (objectives) in the reference model's Enterprise Viewpoint using a fragment of the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) that deals with some aspects of social reality and intentionality. The interpretation of the RM-ODP concepts in terms of this foundation may help to provide a sound underpinning for these concepts and support the identification of possible extensions of the reference model.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper provides an editorial introduction to the current special issue on Open Distributed Processing. It looks back over the development of the ODP standards and at the way in which they have been used, and looks forward at the way current activities are progressing. It contains a broad bibliography covering ODP standards, related research work and application case studies.
    Computer Standards & Interfaces 03/2013; 35(3):247-256. DOI:10.1016/j.csi.2012.05.003 · 1.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In our past work, we have shown that a number of theories from conceptual modeling and ontological analysis can be used to clarify the definitions of role-related and goal-related concepts in the RM-ODP [1,2]. This paper builds up on our earlier efforts by providing an ontology-based account for the notion of communities in the reference model's Enterprise Language [38]. We address issues regarding the composition of communities, the filling of roles in communities, the decomposition of a community's objective into sub-objectives (delegated to community members). The use of an ontology that deals with aspects of social reality and intentionality [30] plays an important role in this account, revealing the intentionality of communities and enterprise objects; the social relations between communities and enterprise objects in the community; the social relations between objects in the community; the social relations between communities; the normative character of a community's contract, etc. The analysis allows us to propose well-founded recommendations for clarifications and identify potential amendments to the standard as well as issues for further investigation.
    Computer Standards & Interfaces 03/2013; 35(3):257–268. DOI:10.1016/j.csi.2012.01.007 · 1.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Enterprise Architecture (EA) promotes the establishment of a holistic view of the structure and way of working of an organization. One of the aspects covered in EA is associated with the organization's "active structure", which concerns "who" undertakes organizational activities. Several approaches have been proposed in order to provide a means for representing enterprise architectures, among which the ArchiMate, an EA modeling language. In this paper, we present a semantic analysis of the fragment of the ArchiMate metamodel related with the representation of active structure. In addition, we present a proposal to extend the metamodel based on a well-founded ontology for the organizational domain. Our objective is to enrich the language with important capabilities to represent organizational structures using a principled ontology-based approach.
    FOMI; 07/2014