Controllability and Stability Analysis of Planar Snake Robot Locomotion

Dept. of Eng. Cybern., Norwegian Univ. of Sci. & Technol. (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (Impact Factor: 2.72). 07/2011; DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2010.2088830
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT This paper contributes to the understanding of snake robot locomotion by employing nonlinear system analysis tools for investigating fundamental properties of snake robot dynamics. The paper has five contributions: 1) a partially feedback linearized model of a planar snake robot influenced by viscous ground friction is developed. 2) A stabilizability analysis is presented proving that any asymptotically stabilizing control law for a planar snake robot to an equilibrium point must be time-varying. 3) A controllability analysis is presented proving that planar snake robots are not controllable when the viscous ground friction is isotropic, but that a snake robot becomes strongly accessible when the viscous ground friction is anisotropic. The analysis also shows that the snake robot does not satisfy sufficient conditions for small-time local controllability (STLC). 4) An analysis of snake locomotion is presented that easily explains how anisotropic viscous ground friction enables snake robots to locomote forward on a planar surface. The explanation is based on a simple mapping from link velocities normal to the direction of motion into propulsive forces in the direction of motion. 5) A controller for straight line path following control of snake robots is proposed and a Poincaré map is investigated to prove that the resulting state variables of the snake robot, except for the position in the forward direction, trace out an exponentially stable periodic orbit.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper considers path following control of snake robots along straight paths. Under the assumption that the forward velocity of the snake robot is nonzero and positive, we prove that the proposed path following controller K -exponentially stabilizes a snake robot to any desired straight path. The performance of the path following controller is investigated through simulations and through experiments with a physical snake robot, where the controller successfully steers the snake robot toward and along the desired straight path.
    IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 02/2012; · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The control problem for the serpentine motion of a planar snake under the assumption of a trajectory characterized by its curvature and heading is examined in this article. The time varying curvature and heading attributes of the trajectory result in a sinusoidal reference signal for the joint angles. An inner loop PD-controller is used for trajectory tracking by compensating the effects of the snake's dynamics, while an outer loop first-order controller is used for the formation of the reference joint angles by tracking the desired heading and velocity. Simulation studies on spiral curves are included to investigate the efficiency of the controller.
    20th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Barcelona, Spain; 07/2012
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We consider a class of multilink mechanical systems arising from undulatory locomotion of multisegmental slender animals. All the body joints are assumed to have actuators, but the system is underactuated because of the lack of direct control over the position and orientation within the inertial frame. Yet, the system is controllable through interactive forces from the environment, just like in animal locomotion. It is systematically revealed that the motion behavior is composed of three fundamental actions: 1) oscillation; 2) orientation; and 3) locomotion. Through rigorous theoretical analyses and numerical simulations, feedback laws are developed to achieve effective control for the aforementioned three actions, exploiting the natural dynamics of body-environment interactions.
    IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 01/2013; 21(5):1537-1548. · 2.00 Impact Factor