Conference Paper

Are 2 electrocardiographic leads enough for multilead wave boundary location and QT measuring?

Bioingenieria, Biomater. y Nanomedicina, CIBER, Spain
Conference: Computers in Cardiology, 2009
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT Different latencies on the cardiac electric phenomena can be found across leads. Thus combining adequately the information provided by multiple leads is essential for the correct location of global wave boundaries. A multilead-VCG strategy for boundaries location, by constructing a transformed spatial lead obtained from 3 orthogonal leads and optimized for delineation improvement, has been previously proposed and validated [1]. The goal of this work was to study and to quantify the performance loss when just 2 orthogonal leads are used. Combination of 2 leads were considered, both using recorded Frank leads, leads synthesised using inverse Dower transformation, and principal component analysis. The errors in QRS onset and T wave end location and in QT interval measurement were evaluated over the PTB database files. Results indicate that 2 leads properly selected are enough to locate QRS onset but possibly not for T wave end.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
89 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, a novel multilead (ML) based automatic strategy for delineation of ECG boundaries is proposed and evaluated with respect to the QRS and T-wave boundaries. The ML strategy is designed from a single-lead (SL) wavelet-transform-based delineation system. It departs from three orthogonal leads and takes advantage of the spatial information provided using a derived lead better fitted for delineation. SL delineation is then applied over this optimal derived lead. The ML strategy produces a reduced error dispersion compared to SL results, thus providing more robust, accurate, and stable boundary locations than any electrocardiographic lead by itself and outperforming strategies based on lead selection rules after SL delineation.
    IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 06/2009; 56(8):1996-2005. · 2.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we developed and evaluated a robust single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) delineation system based on the wavelet transform (WT). In a first step, QRS complexes are detected. Then, each QRS is delineated by detecting and identifying the peaks of the individual waves, as well as the complex onset and end. Finally, the determination of P and T wave peaks, onsets and ends is performed. We evaluated the algorithm on several manually annotated databases, such as MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, QT, European ST-T and CSE databases, developed for validation purposes. The QRS detector obtained a sensitivity of Se = 99.66% and a positive predictivity of P+ = 99.56% over the first lead of the validation databases (more than 980,000 beats), while for the well-known MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database, Se and P+ over 99.8% were attained. As for the delineation of the ECG waves, the mean and standard deviation of the differences between the automatic and manual annotations were computed. The mean error obtained with the WT approach was found not to exceed one sampling interval, while the standard deviations were around the accepted tolerances between expert physicians, outperforming the results of other well known algorithms, especially in determining the end of T wave.
    IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 05/2004; 51(4):570-81. · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The QT interval and the QT dispersion are currently a subject of considerable interest. Cardiac repolarization delay is known to favor the development of arrhythmias. The QT dispersion, defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals or as the standard deviation of the QT duration in the 12-lead ECG is assumed to be reliable predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The seventh annual PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge, 2006 addresses a question of high clinical interest: Can the QT interval be measured by fully automated methods with accuracy acceptable for clinical evaluations? The PTB Diagnostic ECG Database was given to 4 cardiologists and 1 biomedical engineer for manual marking of QRS onsets and T-wave ends in 458 recordings. Each recording consisted of one selected beat in lead II, chosen visually to have minimum baseline shift, noise, and artifact.In cases where no T wave could be observed or its amplitude was very small, the referees were instructed to mark a 'group-T-wave end' taking into consideration leads with better manifested T wave.A modified Delphi approach was used, which included up to three rounds of measurements to obtain results closer to the median. A total amount of 2*5*548 Q-onsets and T-wave ends were manually marked during round 1. To obtain closer to the median results, 8.58 % of Q-onsets and 3.21 % of the T-wave ends had to be reviewed during round 2, and 1.50 % Q-onsets and 1.17 % T-wave ends in round 3. The mean and standard deviation of the differences between the values of the referees and the median after round 3 were 2.43 +/- 0.96 ms for the Q-onset, and 7.43 +/- 3.44 ms for the T-wave end. A fully accessible, on the Internet, dataset of manually measured Q-onsets and T-wave ends was created and presented in additional file: 1 (Table 4) with this article. Thus, an available standard can be used for the development of automated methods for the detection of Q-onsets, T-wave ends and for QT interval measurements.
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine 02/2006; 5:31. · 1.61 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

View
34 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014