Conference Paper

Spectral variability within species and its effects on Savanna tree species discrimination

Natural Resources & the Environ., Ecosyst.- Earth Obs., Council for Sci. & Ind. Res. (CSIR), Pretoria, South Africa
DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2009.5418038 Conference: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,2009 IEEE International,IGARSS 2009, Volume: 2
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT Differences in within-species phenology and structure driven by factors including topography, edaphic properties, and climatic variables present important challenges for species differentiation with remote sensing in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. The objective of this study was to examine probable factors including intraspecies spectral variability and the spectral sample size that could affect remote sensing of Savanna tree species across a land-use gradient in the Kruger National park. Eighteen species were examined: Acacia gerradii, Acacia nigrescens, Combretum apiculatum, Combretum collinum, Combretum hereroense, Combretum imberbe, Combretum zeyheri, Dichrostachys cinerea, Euclea sp (E. divinurum and E. natalensis, Gymnosporia sp (G. buxifolia and G. senegalensis), Lonchocarpus capassa, Peltoforum africanum, Piliostigma thonningii, Pterocarpus rotundifolia, Sclerocarya birrea, Strychnos sp (S. madagascariensis, S. usambarensis), Terminalia sericea and Ziziphus mucronata. Discriminating species using the K-nearest neighbour (K = 1) classifier with spectral angle mapper (SAM) yielded a higher classification accuracy (48% overall accuracy) compared to 16% for the classification involving the mean spectra for each species as the training spectral set. Within-species spectral variability and the training sample size were identified as important factors affecting classification accuracy of the tree species. We recommend a non-parametric classifier such as K-nearest neighbour classifier for classifying and mapping tree species in a highly complex environment such as the savanna system of the Kruger National Park.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
133 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The accurate classification and mapping of individual trees at species level in the savanna ecosystem can provide numerous benefits for the managerial authorities. Such benefits include the mapping of economically useful tree species, which are a key source of food production and fuel wood for the local communities, and of problematic alien invasive and bush encroaching species, which can threaten the integrity of the environment and livelihoods of the local communities. Species level mapping is particularly challenging in African savannas which are complex, heterogeneous, and open environments with high intra-species spectral variability due to differences in geology, topography, rainfall, herbivory and human impacts within relatively short distances. Savanna vegetation are also highly irregular in canopy and crown shape, height and other structural dimensions with a combination of open grassland patches and dense woody thicket - a stark contrast to the more homogeneous forest vegetation. This study classified eight common savanna tree species in the Greater Kruger National Park region, South Africa, using a combination of hyperspectral and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-derived structural parameters, in the form of seven predictor datasets, in an automated Random Forest modelling approach. The most important predictors, which were found to play an important role in the different classification models and contributed to the success of the hybrid dataset model when combined, were species tree height; NDVI; the chlorophyll b wavelength (466 nm) and a selection of raw, continuum removed and Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) bands. It was also concluded that the hybrid predictor dataset Random Forest model yielded the highest classification accuracy and prediction success for the eight savanna tree species with an overall classification accuracy of 87.68% and KHAT value of 0.843.
    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 04/2012; · 2.90 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
29 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014