Conference Paper

Pick-by-Vision: A first stress test

Tech. Univ. Munchen, Munich, Germany
DOI: 10.1109/ISMAR.2009.5336484 Conference: Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2009. ISMAR 2009. 8th IEEE International Symposium on
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT In this paper we report on our ongoing studies around the application of augmented reality methods to support the order picking process of logistics applications. Order picking is the gathering of goods out of a prepared range of items following some customer orders. We named the visual support of this order picking process using head-mounted displays ldquopick-by-visionrdquo. This work presents the case study of bringing our previously developed pick-by-vision system from the lab to an experimental factory hall to evaluate it under more realistic conditions. This includes the execution of two user studies. In the first one we compared our pick-by-vision system with and without tracking to picking using a paper list to check picking performance and quality in general. In a second test we had subjects using the pick-by-vision system continuously for two hours to gain in-depth insight into the longer use of our system, checking user strain besides the general performance. Furthermore, we report on the general obstacles of trying to use HMD-based AR in an industrial setup and discuss our observations of user behaviour.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The potential of Augmented Reality (AR) to support industrial processes has been demonstrated in several studies. While there have been first investigations on user related issues in the long-duration use of mobile AR systems, to date the impact of theses systems on physiological and psychological aspects is not explored extensively. We conducted an extended study in which 19 participants worked 4 hours continuously in an order picking process with and without AR support. Results of the study comparing strain and work efficiency are presented and open issues are discussed.
    9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2010, Seoul, Korea, 13-16 October 2010; 01/2010
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Procedural tasks are common to many domains, ranging from maintenance and repair, to medicine, to the arts. We describe and evaluate a prototype augmented reality (AR) user interface designed to assist users in the relatively under-explored psychomotor phase of procedural tasks. In this phase, the user begins physical manipulations, and thus alters aspects of the underlying task environment. Our prototype tracks the user and multiple components in a typical maintenance assembly task, and provides dynamic, prescriptive, overlaid instructions on a see-through head-worn display in response to the user's ongoing activity. A user study shows participants were able to complete psychomotor aspects of the assembly task significantly faster and with significantly greater accuracy than when using 3D-graphics-based assistance presented on a stationary LCD. Qualitative questionnaire results indicate that participants overwhelmingly preferred the AR condition, and ranked it as more intuitive than the LCD condition.
    10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011, Basel, Switzerland, October 26-29, 2011; 01/2011
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has been a rapid increase in research evaluating usability of Augmented Reality (AR) systems in recent years. Although many different styles of evaluation are used, there is no clear consensus on the most relevant approaches. We report a review of papers published in International Symposium of Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) proceedings in the past decade, building on the previous work of Swan and Gabbard (2005). Firstly, we investigate the evaluation goal, measurement and method of ISMAR papers according to their usability research in four categories: performance, perception and cognition, collaboration and User Experience (UX). Secondly, we consider the balance of evaluation approaches with regard to empirical-analytical, quantitative-qualitative and participant demographics. Finally we identify potential emphases for usability study of AR systems in the future. These analyses provide a reference point for current evaluation techniques, trends and challenges, which benefit researchers intending to design, conduct and interpret usability evaluations for future AR systems.
    Interacting with Computers. 11/2012; 24(6):450-460.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 23, 2014