MHC class I antigen processing distinguishes endogenous antigens based on their translation from cellular vs. viral mRNA

Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 04/2012; 109(18):7025-30. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1112387109
Source: PubMed


To better understand the generation of MHC class I-associated peptides, we used a model antigenic protein whose proteasome-mediated degradation is rapidly and reversibly controlled by Shield-1, a cell-permeant drug. When expressed from a stably transfected gene, the efficiency of antigen presentation is ~2%, that is, one cell-surface MHC class I-peptide complex is generated for every 50 folded source proteins degraded upon Shield-1 withdrawal. By contrast, when the same protein is expressed by vaccinia virus, its antigen presentation efficiency is reduced ~10-fold to values similar to those reported for other vaccinia virus-encoded model antigens. Virus infection per se does not modify the efficiency of antigen processing. Rather, the efficiency difference between cellular and virus-encoded antigens is based on whether the antigen is synthesized from transgene- vs. virus-encoded mRNA. Thus, class I antigen-processing machinery can distinguish folded proteins based on the precise details of their synthesis to modulate antigen presentation efficiency.

Download full-text


Available from: Jonathan W Yewdell, Oct 08, 2015
29 Reads
  • Source
    • "Favoring the DRiPs model, viral epitopes for CTL have been shown to be generated from recently synthesized peptides, rather than from mature proteins, confirming the potential of this mechanism for altering the host peptide repertoire (71). Additionally, the efficiency of presentation of an epitope may depend on the source, viral or cellular, of the mRNA and there may also be compartmentalization in the subcellular localization of peptides for class I presentation (65, 72). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The inhibitory receptors for MHC class I have a central role in controlling natural killer (NK) cell activity. Soon after their discovery, it was found that these receptors have a degree of peptide selectivity. Such peptide selectivity has been demonstrated for all inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) tested to date, certain activating KIR, and also members of the C-type lectin-like family of receptors. This selectivity is much broader than the peptide specificity of T cell receptors, with NK cell receptors recognizing peptide motifs, rather than individual peptides. Inhibitory receptors on NK cells can survey the peptide:MHC complexes expressed on the surface of target cells, therefore subsequent transduction of an inhibitory signal depends on the overall peptide content of these MHC class I complexes. Functionally, KIR-expressing NK cells have been shown to be unexpectedly sensitive to changes in the peptide content of MHC class I, as peptide:MHC class I complexes that weakly engage KIR can antagonize the inhibitory signals generated by engagement of stronger KIR-binding peptide:MHC class I complexes. This property provides KIR-expressing NK cells with the potential to recognize changes in the peptide:MHC class I repertoire, which may occur during viral infections and tumorigenesis. By contrast, in the presence of HLA class I leader peptides, virus-derived peptides can induce a synergistic inhibition of CD94:NKG2A-expressing NK cells through recruitment of CD94 in the absence of NKG2A. On the other hand, CD94:NKG2A-positive NK cells can be exquisitely sensitive to changes in the levels of MHC class I. Peptide antagonism and sensitivity to changes in MHC class I levels are properties that distinguish KIR and CD94:NKG2A. The subtle difference in the properties of NK cells expressing these receptors provides a rationale for having complementary inhibitory receptor systems for MHC class I.
    Frontiers in Immunology 03/2014; 5:133. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00133
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The immediate presentation of peptide epitopes on MHC class I (MHC I) after antigen expression has led to the concept that MHC I ligands are mostly derived from defective ribosomal products (DRiPs), a subset of newly synthesized proteins that are rapidly degraded by the proteasome. Whether and to what extent mature proteins contribute to the antigenic pool, however, has remained elusive. Here, we developed a conditional antigen expression system that allows studying antigen presentation from mature proteins by inducing their rapid proteasomal degradation in the absence of further antigen synthesis. Target cells in which expression of two Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens was induced were rapidly recognized by antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells in a time- and dosage-dependent manner, demonstrating that antigen presentation was linked to antigen synthesis. By contrast, T cells failed to recognize target cells containing large amounts of mature protein even after induction of their rapid proteasomal degradation. Thus, the presentation of these antigens proved to be strictly dependent on protein synthesis whereas mature proteins failed to furnish the antigenic pool. These results have implications for the design of immunotherapeutic strategies that aim at targeting proteins with increased half-lives and are hence overexpressed in tumors.
    European Journal of Immunology 12/2012; 42(12). DOI:10.1002/eji.201242627 · 4.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The field of antigen processing and presentation has taken tremendous strides since the first international workshop in 1995. While much has been learned, much remains to be discovered. Here I discuss the most recent findings regarding the nature of substrates for the MHC class I antigen processing pathways which provide glimpses of the mist shrouded features remaining to be discovered.
    Molecular Immunology 12/2012; 55(2). DOI:10.1016/j.molimm.2012.10.023 · 2.97 Impact Factor
Show more