Total hip replacement for the treatment of acute femoral neck fractures: results from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales at 3-5 years after surgery.

Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, UK.
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (Impact Factor: 1.33). 04/2012; 94(3):193-8. DOI: 10.1308/003588412X13171221589720
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper describes, for the first time, the outcomes of patients undergoing total hip replacement for acute fractured neck of femur (#NOF) as recorded by the National Joint Registry of England and Wales (NJR).
In the NJR we identified 1,302 of 157,232 Hospital Episode Statistics linked patients who had been recorded as having a total hip replacement for acute #NOF between April 2003 and November 2008.
The revision rate at five years for fully uncemented components was 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-7.3%), for hybrid it was 2.2% (95% CI: 0.9%-5.3%) and for fully cemented components 0.9% (95% CI: 0.4-2.0%). Five-year revision rates were increased for those whose operations were performed via a posterior versus a lateral approach. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 30-day mortality was 1.4% (95% CI: 1.0-2.4%), which is over double the 30-day mortality rate for total hip replacement identified by the Office for National Statistics. The mean length of stay was also increased for those undergoing total hip replacements for #NOF compared with non-emergency indications.
Our data suggest that total hip replacements for acute #NOF give comparable results with total hip replacements for other indications.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several authors have developed and applied methods to routine data sets to identify the nature and rate of complications following interventional procedures. But, to date, there has been no systematic search for such methods. The objective of this article was to find, classify and appraise published methods, based on analysis of clinical codes, which used routine healthcare databases in a United Kingdom setting to identify complications resulting from interventional procedures. A literature search strategy was developed to identify published studies that referred, in the title or abstract, to the name or acronym of a known routine healthcare database and to complications from procedures or devices. The following data sources were searched in February and March 2013: Cochrane Methods Register, Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science, Econlit, EMBASE, Health Management Information Consortium, Health Technology Assessment database, MathSciNet, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-process, OAIster, OpenGrey, Science Citation Index Expanded and ScienceDirect. Of the eligible papers, those which reported methods using clinical coding were classified and summarised in tabular form using the following headings: routine healthcare database; medical speciality; method for identifying complications; length of follow-up; method of recording comorbidity. The benefits and limitations of each approach were assessed. From 3688 papers identified from the literature search, 44 reported the use of clinical codes to identify complications, from which four distinct methods were identified: 1) searching the index admission for specified clinical codes, 2) searching a sequence of admissions for specified clinical codes, 3) searching for specified clinical codes for complications from procedures and devices within the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) coding scheme which is the methodology recommended by NHS Classification Service, and 4) conducting manual clinical review of diagnostic and procedure codes. The four distinct methods identifying complication from codified data offer great potential in generating new evidence on the quality and safety of new procedures using routine data. However the most robust method, using the methodology recommended by the NHS Classification Service, was the least frequently used, highlighting that much valuable observational data is being ignored.
    BMC Medical Research Methodology 11/2014; 14(1):126. · 2.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate outcomes of cementless total hip replacement after acute femoral neck fracture in active patients. A prospective matched study was conducted to compare the results between 76 patients with fractures and 76 patients with osteoarthritis. The Harris score, short-WOMAC and SF-12 were used for the clinical assessment. The mean follow-up was 7.3 years (range 5-11). There were no significant differences in medical or surgical complications between the 2 groups. Functional outcomes were similar, but more walking aids were used in fracture group. There were 6 revisions among the fractures group (one dislocation, 2 deep infections, 3 aseptic loosening), and 2 aseptic loosening among controls. There was no significant difference in arthroplasty survival at 10 years (88.7 vs. 96.1%, P=.15). The mortality rates at 2 and 10 years were similar. Cementless total hip replacement for treatment of acute femoral neck fracture showed similar results to those of elective surgery for osteoarthritis in these selected patients.
    Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia 02/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die allgemeinen und speziellen Komplikationen bei Patienten mit hüftnahen Frakturen, wie auch die in der Folge resultierende Beeinträchtigung der Mobilität und der kognitiven Funktion, lassen sich durch einen strukturierten Ablauf von Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation, basierend auf einem multidisziplinären Behandlungspfad, reduzieren.In der initialen Phase liegt der Fokus nach der Sicherung der Diagnose und dem Einleiten einer adäquaten Schmerztherapie auf der Erfassung der allgemeinen Risikofaktoren, der kognitiven Funktion und einem geriatrischen Screening. Die Indikation zur Operation und die Festlegung der Operationsmethode (totale oder teilweise Hüftprothese, Osteosynthese) werden von unfallchirurgischer Seite vorgegeben. Die unfallchirurgische Therapieentscheidung orientiert sich, abgesehen vom Frakturtyp, am Alter des Patienten, seiner kognitiven Funktion, der vorbestehenden Mobilität bzw. dem funktionellen Anspruch und der Operationstauglichkeit. Im Mittelpunkt der anästhesiologischen Evaluierung steht die Risikostratifzierung für den Patienten hinsichtlich der Operationstauglichkeit und die Frage, ob wesentliche Grunderkrankungen in einem definierten Zeitraum (24 bis maximal 48 h) verbessert werden können. Die präoperative Diagnostik und eventuell erforderliche Interventionen sind interdisziplinär zu koordinieren. Postoperativ erfolgt eine weitere Evaluierung hinsichtlich der Lebensumstände des Patienten vor dem Sturzereignis, des Ernährungszustandes, des weiteren Versorgungsbedarfs sowie hinsichtlich sturzspezifischer Medikamente, die Osteoporosetherapie und ein Delir-Screening.
    Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 01/2013; 163.