Clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer rehabilitation: syntheses of guideline recommendations and qualitative appraisals.

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.2). 04/2012; 118(8 Suppl):2312-24. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27461
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite strides in early detection and management of breast cancer, the primary treatments for this disease continue to result in physical impairments for some of the nearly 3 million people diagnosed annually. Over the past decade, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed with goals of preventing and ameliorating these impairments. However, translation of these guidelines into clinical practice needs to be accelerated.
Relevant health science databases (2001-2011) were searched to identify CPGs on breast cancer rehabilitation for the following impairments: upper extremity restrictions, lymphedema, pain, fatigue, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, treatment-related cardiotoxicity, bone health, and weight management.
Recommendations from 19 relevant CPGs were first summarized by impairment within tables; commonalities across guidelines, within each impairment, were then synthesized within the article. The CPGs were rated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II); wide variability was noted in rigor of development, clarity of presentation, and stakeholder involvement. The most rigorous and comprehensive of those rated was the adult cancer pain guideline from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.
Based on a large body of evidence published in recent years, including randomized trials and systematic reviews, there is an urgent need for updating the guidelines on upper extremity musculoskeletal impairments and lymphedema. Furthermore, additional research is needed to provide an evidence base for developing rehabilitation guidelines on management of other impairments identified in the prospective surveillance model, eg, arthralgia.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Purpose: Cancer survivorship is increasing. However, life-saving treatments often leave people with physical, cognitive and emotional sequelae that contribute to activity and participation limitations. The purpose of this review is to summarize current evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions to address problems during survivorship. Method: Best evidence synthesis. The review took as its starting point a systematic review of patient needs and supportive care interventions following cancer treatment. The study team identified the needs which could be addressed by rehabilitation and suggested others not originally included. Then they built on the earlier review's conclusions regarding effective intervention through extraction of results from subsequent systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Results: Evidence regarding the effectiveness of potential rehabilitation interventions was reviewed for physical functioning, fatigue, pain, sexual functioning, cognitive functioning, depression, employment, nutrition and participation. With the exception of physical rehabilitation interventions following breast cancer, this literature tends to focus on psychoeducational interventions, which have demonstrated limited effectiveness for rehabilitation outcomes. Conclusions: Most of the knowledge available regarding potential rehabilitation interventions comes from psychosocial oncology literature. While there are limitations, this literature provides an excellent starting point to examine the potential effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions within cancer survivorship programs. Implications for Rehabilitation Good evidence exists for the use of exercise/physical rehabilitation in reducing fatigue after treatment for most cancers, and improving upper extremity functioning following treatment for breast cancer. Preliminary evidence exists in a number of areas that may be improved by rehabilitation interventions, such as pain, sexual functioning, cognitive functioning and return to work, but further research is needed. No intervention studies addressing participation limitations were identified. Rehabilitation professionals are encouraged to take the lead in exploring participation limitations among cancer survivors and developing suitable interventions.
    Disability and Rehabilitation 03/2013; · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of this article is to propose some practical means of pain management in radiation departments. Pain management in radiation oncology is difficult because of the high proportion of painful patients, underestimation by medical teams, and limited therapeutic options. Pain can cause mobilization difficulties, set-up errors, treatment interruption. According to procedure steps, a preventive attitude (for pre-radiation consultation) or an active attitude (for treatment) to quickly relieve the patient can be planned. This work is a brain storming about pain management. It is not a review about analgesic radiotherapy. The practical situations apply to patients to whom radiotherapy is indicated. Teamwork and anticipation are keywords to relieve patients. All proposed means are not always available for different reasons (time, finance, staff, training). The idea is to establish simple procedures that are appropriate to each center to fluidify acts, to optimize time for a successful irradiation.
    Cancer/Radiothérapie 08/2013; · 1.48 Impact Factor
  • Physiotherapy Canada 01/2013; 65(2):192-193. · 0.52 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 3, 2014