Article

Current patch test results with the European baseline series and extensions to it from the 'European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy' network, 2007-2008

Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Contact Dermatitis (Impact Factor: 3.62). 04/2012; 67(1):9-19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02070.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The pattern of contact sensitization to the supposedly most important allergens assembled in the baseline series differs between countries, presumably at least partly because of exposure differences. Objectives. To describe the prevalence of contact sensitization to allergens tested in consecutive patients in the years 2007 and 2008, and to discuss possible differences.
Data from the 39 departments in 11 European countries comprising the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy network (www.essca-dc.org) in this period have been pooled and analysed according to common standards.
Patch test results with the European baseline series, and country-specific or department-specific additions to it, obtained in 25 181 patients, showed marked international variation. Metals and fragrances are still the most frequent allergens across Europe. Some allergens tested nationally may be useful future additions to the European baseline series, for example methylisothiazolinone, whereas a few long-term components of the European baseline series, namely primin and clioquinol, no longer warrant routine testing.
The present analysis points to 'excess' prevalences of specific contact sensitization in some countries, although interpretation must be cautious if only few, and possibly specialized, centres are representing one country. A comparison as presented may help to target in-depth research into possible causes of 'excess' exposure, and/or consideration of methodological issues, including modifications to the baseline series.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Radoslaw Spiewak, Jul 28, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
403 Views
  • Source
    • "Diagnostics), and data on the frequency of positive reactions in patch tests on the basis of a multicentre European study ESSCA [7] and the Polish multicenter Krak study of children [8] and adults [9] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contact allergy is specific hypersensitivity reaction of delayed type to low molecular weight substances, referred to as haptens. The hypersensitivity is induced by a direct exposure of the skin to the hapten with a range of co-factors required to breach immune tolerance. Subsequent reactions may be provoked either by direct contact to the skin or by systemic exposure. The most frequent clinical manifestation of contact allergy is allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), which is among the three most common diseases from the spectrum of eczema. As various eczemas frequently co-exist and are very hard (or even impossible) to differentiate based merely upon clinical symptoms, the diagnosis of ACD should be considered in each case of chronic or recurrent eczema, including routine patch testing. The present article discusses the current knowledge on the pathomechanisms and clinical picture of ACD. Patch test is the only method available and a gold standard for the detection of contact allergy and diagnosis of the ACD. In Poland, the mainstay of the routine diagnosis of patients with eczema is the Polish Baseline Series, which is discussed here along with its recent updates. Additional testing according to patient's exposure is always to be considered, with special attention required to patient's own topical drugs and cosmetics, including emollients and moisturizers. Furthermore, the treatment options for ACD are discussed with stressing the importance of avoiding offending haptens as the first line of therapy.
    11/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.alergo.2014.11.001
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relationship between atopy and contact allergy has intrigued researchers all over the world. The inspiration for this task was confligting views on the existence or absence of a relationship between these immune disorders found in the literature. The aim of the study was to confirm or exclude the existence of a connection relationship between the presence of atopy and the presence of contact allergy. Material and methods. This retrospective study performed in the Allergy Outpatient Departments for Children and Adults at the Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health in Sosnowiec involved 115 patients - 91 women and 24 men, aged 11-83 years (median 46). All of the patients underwent skin prick tests with 10 allergen extracts and patch tests with 20 haptens. For the purpose of the present work, positive results of prick tests were considered as a marker of atopy, and positive patch tests as a marker of contact allergy. An attempt was also made to quantify the severity of atopy (independent variable) based on the number of positive skin prick tests. Results. To reject or approve the hypothesis on the lack of therelationship between the occurrence of both immune disorders, nonparametric correlation analysis was performed using the Kendall Tau test, which did not confirm the existence of a statistically significant relationship between atopy and contact allergy. However, in case of severe atopy (3 or more positive skin prick tests), a statistically insignificant trend was observed toward a higher risk of contact allergy. Conclusion. Our results permit to conclude that atopy and contact allergy are independent from each other, therefore, both immune disorders may incidentally coexist in patients. Key words: atopy, contact allergy, prick tests, patch tests, risk factors
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background  Allergic contact dermatitis is a frequent, often disabling disease caused by countless substances. Patch testing remains the gold standard test to identify the causative agent; however, it is subjective, time-consuming and not completely safe. Alternative methods were tried, but significant success has only been achieved with nickel. Objective  Develop an alternative or complementary allergic contact dermatitis diagnostic test. Methods  We compared the lymphocyte proliferative rate and cytokine production (IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17 and RANTES) between 18 chromium allergic patients and 19 controls. Results  The lymphocyte proliferation test and some of the cytokines tested (IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-5, IL-12 and IL-13) were able to discriminate allergic patients. However, striking results were only achieved using IL-13, leading to an accuracy of about 90%. Conclusions  If further studies confirm the data found, IL-13 could be used as an alternative or complementary test to detect chromium contact allergy whereas lymphocyte proliferation test, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-5 and IL-12 detections may serve as additional diagnostic tests.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 10/2012; 27(3). DOI:10.1111/jdv.12005 · 3.11 Impact Factor
Show more