Modélisation, optimisation dynamique et commande d’un méthaniseur par digestion anaérobie

Thesis for: Master, Advisor: Grégory François and Monique Polit


Today, anaerobic bioreactors are high-performance industrial facilities that are able to remove polluted wastewaters of the food-processing industries. Their capability to transform pollutant is interesting on an ecologic and energetic perspective, since biogases are deemed to be renewable energy sources. However, anaerobic digestion is often performed in a suboptimal manner, notably during the starting phases since biomass concentration transitory profiles are not correctly modelled. A tendency model has been developed on the basis of an existing dynamic model to predict independently bacteria in the solution and bacteria that are bound together in a biofilm. Model parameter identification has been performed using data obtained on the bioreactor of the Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory of the INRA of Narbonne. With this tendency model, optimal control profiles have been found, in terms of dilution rate and organic substrate inlet concentration. Applying this optimal profile to the system leads to a reducing of the time needed to reach a pre-specified yield. In addition, dilution rate was used to control the purification yield. This case study raised a good compromise between high purification rate and a significant final time reduction of the start-up phase.

Download full-text


Available from: Julien Eynard, Oct 02, 2015
350 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main bottleneck in using optimization in industry is the way uncertainty is handled, which forms the subject of this series of two papers. The first part dealt with the characteriza- tion of the nominal solution and proposed an approach to separate the constraint-seeking and the compromise-seeking components of the inputs. This second part reviews various strategies for optimization under uncertainty, namely the robust and measurement-based optimization schemes. A novel scheme, labeled invariant-based optimization, is proposed, where optimal- ity is achieved by tracking references that remain invariant under uncertainty. The different approaches are compared via the simulation of a bioreactor for penicillin production.
    Computers & Chemical Engineering 01/2000; · 2.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anaerobic digestion modelling is an established method for assessing anaerobic wastewater treatment for design, systems analysis, operational analysis, and control. Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater is a relatively new, but rapidly maturing technology, especially in developing countries, where the combination of low cost, and moderate-good performance are particularly attractive. The key emerging technology is high-rate anaerobic treatment, particularly UASB reactors. Systems modelling can potentially offer a number of advantages to this field, and the key motivations for modelling have been identified as operational analysis, technology development, and model-based design. Design is particularly important, as it determines capital cost, a key motivation for implementers. Published modelling studies for anaerobic domestic sewage treatment are limited in number, but well directed at specific issues. Most have a low structural complexity, with first order kinetics, as compared to the more commonly used Monod kinetics. This review addresses the use of anaerobic models in general, application of models to domestic sewage systems, and evaluates future requirements for models that need to address the key motivations of operational analysis, technology development, and model-based design. For operational analysis and technology development, a complex model such as the ADM1 is recommended, with further extensions as required to address factors such as sulphate reduction. For design, the critical issues are hydraulics and particles (i.e., biomass and solid substrate) modelling. Therefore, the kinetic structure should be relatively simple (at least two-step), but the hydraulic and particulate model should be relatively complex.
    Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 02/2006; 5(1). DOI:10.1007/s11157-005-7191-z · 3.33 Impact Factor