Six years after deregulation of emergency contraception in Switzerland: has free access induced changes in the profile of clients attending an emergency pharmacy in Zürich?

Clinic for Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care (Impact Factor: 1.81). 04/2012; 17(3):197-204. DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2012.661108
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Emergency contraception (EC) has been freely accessible in Swiss pharmacies since November 2002. Today some groups are still concerned that free access might result in less use of efficient contraceptive methods, overuse and more risky sexual behaviour.
Profiles of EC users one and six years after deregulation were analysed with regard to age, contraceptive methods used, reasons for EC use, and last contact with a gynaecologist. Data were collected from a centrally located pharmacy. Written official assessment forms concerning 1500 women (750 in 2004 and 750 in 2009) were analysed.
Free access to EC use had no impact on regular contraceptive behaviour. The percentage of pill and condom users was very high (85%). The percentage of EC-users without any contraception (17-18%) was the same over the years. In 2009, condom rupture was reported more frequently (p < 0.001). In addition significantly more women had used EC previously in their history.
Free access to EC has not resulted in less use of efficient contraceptive methods. In the context of falling abortion rates our results are reassuring. This also applies to adolescents, who mainly used EC as a back-up method and seldom in the context of unprotected intercourse.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate whether advance provision of emergency contraception increases its use and/or adversely affects usual contraceptive practices. We performed a randomized controlled trial comparing advance provision of emergency contraception with usual care in 370 postpartum women from an inner-city public hospital. Participants were followed for 1 year; 85% were available for at least one follow-up session. All participants received routine contraceptive education. The intervention group received a supply of emergency contraception (eight oral contraceptive pills containing 0.15 mg of levonorgestrel and 30 microg of ethinyl estradiol) and a 5-minute educational session. We compared use of emergency contraception and changes in contraceptive behaviors between groups. Women provided with pills were four times as likely to have used emergency contraception as women in the control group over the course of the year (17% versus 4%; relative risk [RR] 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8, 9.0). Women were no more likely to have changed to a less effective method of birth control (30% versus 33%; RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.63, 1.3), or to be using contraception less consistently (18% versus 25%; RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.45, 1.2). About half of each group reported at least one episode of unprotected intercourse during follow-up, but women who received emergency contraception were six times as likely to have used it (25% versus 4%; RR 5.8; 95% CI 2.1, 16.4). Advance provision of emergency contraception significantly increased use without adversely affecting use of routine contraception. It is safe and appropriate to provide emergency contraception to all postpartum women before discharge from the hospital.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2003; 102(1):8-16. · 4.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A cohort of women aged 14-29 in 1993 was identified from the General Practice Research Database and followed up for a period of 4 years. Patient files were searched for evidence of use of emergency contraception and regular contraception. Of the 95 007 women, 15 105 (16%) had received emergency contraception during the study period (an average of 5% per annum). There was a small year on year increase in uptake of emergency contraception between 1994 and 1997. Only 4% of emergency contraception users received emergency contraception more than twice in any year. More than 70% of those who had no previous record of use of regular contraception had used regular contraception within 1 year of using emergency contraception. Teenagers were more likely than other age groups to use emergency contraception, to be repeat users of emergency contraception and to fail to start regular contraception after first use of emergency contraception until later in the study period. These results disprove the notion of widespread repeated use of emergency contraception. They show that provision of an emergency contraception service does not result in failure to initiate regular contraception or abandonment of regular contraception; rather they show many women using regular contraception for the first time after use of emergency contraception.
    The British journal of family planning 08/2000; 26(3):138-43.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Emergency hormonal contraception (EC) has the potential to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and induced abortions, but many barriers to more prevalent usage exist. We evaluated one aspect of access--pharmacy availability of levonorgestrel EC (Plan B) or alternatives--in Jacksonville, FL. Female "secret shoppers" presented in person and by telephone to pharmacies in Jacksonville, FL, and inquired if Plan B would be available if they were to return with a prescription. Availability of the medication, as well as offers of EC alternatives or alternate methods of obtaining EC, was noted. Furthermore, pharmacist and pharmacy staff knowledge regarding appropriate use of the product was assessed. Of 54 pharmacies visited by secret shoppers, 21 (39%) had Plan B in stock and were willing to dispense it. Sixteen pharmacies (29%) could order it and have it available within 24 h, or knew of nearby pharmacies that stocked the medication. Neither Plan B nor other EC options were offered by 17 pharmacies (31%). One hundred thirty-three pharmacies, including those that were visited in person, were contacted by telephone. Forty-two (32%) of these had Plan B in stock. Another 22 pharmacies (17%) offered to order Plan B for availability within 24 h or less. Furthermore, 11 pharmacies suggested other stores that were more likely to carry it. Of 40 pharmacy staff members asked how long following unprotected intercourse a patient had to take the product, 20 (50%) correctly stated 72 h. Plan B was not in stock in a majority of pharmacies within this large city. Availability was increased by offers to order the medication or by suggestions to seek the prescription at nearby pharmacies. Many pharmacists and their staff were unfamiliar with the medication and its correct usage.
    Contraception 03/2007; 75(2):126-30. · 3.09 Impact Factor