Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2008, Featuring Cancers Associated With Excess Weight and Lack of Sufficient Physical Activity

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA.
Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.89). 05/2012; 118(9):2338-66. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27514
Source: PubMed


Open access:

Annual updates on cancer occurrence and trends in the United States are provided through collaboration between the American Cancer Society (ACS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR). This year's report highlights the increased cancer risk associated with excess weight (overweight or obesity) and lack of sufficient physical activity (<150 minutes of physical activity per week).
Data on cancer incidence were obtained from the CDC, NCI, and NAACCR; data on cancer deaths were obtained from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics. Annual percent changes in incidence and death rates (age-standardized to the 2000 US population) for all cancers combined and for the leading cancers among men and among women were estimated by joinpoint analysis of long-term trends (incidence for 1992-2008 and mortality for 1975-2008) and short-term trends (1999-2008). Information was obtained from national surveys about the proportion of US children, adolescents, and adults who are overweight, obese, insufficiently physically active, or physically inactive.
Death rates from all cancers combined decreased from 1999 to 2008, continuing a decline that began in the early 1990s, among men and among women in most racial and ethnic groups. Death rates decreased from 1999 to 2008 for most cancer sites, including the 4 most common cancers (lung, colorectum, breast, and prostate). The incidence of prostate and colorectal cancers also decreased from 1999 to 2008. Lung cancer incidence declined from 1999 to 2008 among men and from 2004 to 2008 among women. Breast cancer incidence decreased from 1999 to 2004 but was stable from 2004 to 2008. Incidence increased for several cancers, including pancreas, kidney, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, which are associated with excess weight.
Although improvements are reported in the US cancer burden, excess weight and lack of sufficient physical activity contribute to the increased incidence of many cancers, adversely affect quality of life for cancer survivors, and may worsen prognosis for several cancers. The current report highlights the importance of efforts to promote healthy weight and sufficient physical activity in reducing the cancer burden in the United States.

Download full-text


Available from: Jane Henley, Nov 13, 2014
  • Source
    • "Obesity is a leading risk factor for EC [3] [4], particularly Type I (estrogen stimulated) forms [5] [6], which are rising in the U.S. [7]. Although death rates from most cancers have decreased, overall mortality rates in EC are increasing in the U.S. [8]. Obese EC survivors have poorer overall survival than normal weight EC survivors [9] and have the highest risk of death among all obesity-associated cancers [10] [11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Obesity is a leading risk factor for endometrial cancer (EC), particularly Type I forms, which are increasing in the U.S. Although death rates from most cancers have been decreasing, overall mortality in EC is increasing in the U.S. EC survivors’ poor fitness combined with their surgical treatments may make weight loss particularly challenging. High intensity exercise increases neurotrophins and neurological reward via altered striatal dopamine in animals; and, in humans, chronic high intensity exercise enhances meal-induced satiety and may reduce hedonic eating. 'Assisted' exercise, a mode of exercise whereby a patient’s voluntary exercise rate is augmented mechanically, may modulate brain dopamine levels in Parkinson's Disease patients but has not been previously evaluated as a treatment for obesity. Methods We describe the rationale and design of the REWARD trial, which has the overarching goal of randomizing 120 obese EC survivors to 'assisted' or voluntary rate cycling to evaluate the efficacy of ‘assisted’ exercise in enhancing and sustaining weight loss. Patients in both arms will receive 3 days/week of supervised exercise and 1 day/week of a group behavioral dietary intervention for 16 weeks and, then, will be followed for 6 months. Outcomes The primary outcome is weight loss. Secondary outcomes include measures for body composition, fitness, eating behavior, exercise motivation, quality of life as well as cognition and food reward and motivation as assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) tasks. Conclusions If successful, the REWARD program could be extended to help sustain weight loss in obese cancer and non-cancer patients.
    Contemporary Clinical Trials 08/2014; 39(2). DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2014.08.008 · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Cancer is not only responsible for a vast proportion of mortality in the United States, but also represents a significant disease burden [1]. Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women, and colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in both females and males [2]. In 2009, breast, cervical and colorectal cancers combined account for nearly one-quarter of the new cancer cases (female breast- 211,731; uterine cervix- 12,357; colorectal cancer- 66,494 in females and 70,223 in males ) [3] and nearly 20% of expected cancer deaths (female breast- 40,676; uterine cervix- 3,909; colorectal cancer- 25,042 in females and 26,808 in males ) [4]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Special events are common community-based strategies for health promotion. This paper presents findings from a systematic literature review on the impact of special events to promote breast, cervical or colorectal cancer education and screening. Articles in English that focused on special events involving breast, cervical, and/or colorectal cancer conducted in the U.S. and published between January 1990 and December 2011 were identified from seven databases: Ovid, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstract, Cochrane Libraries, and EconLit. Study inclusion and data extraction were independently validated by two researchers. Of the 20 articles selected for screening out of 1,409, ten articles on special events reported outcome data. Five types of special events were found: health fairs, parties, cultural events, special days, and plays. Many focused on breast cancer only, or in combination with other cancers. Reach ranged from 50-1732 participants. All special events used at least one evidence-based strategy suggested by the Community Guide to Preventive Services, such as small media, one-on-one education, and reducing structural barriers. For cancer screening as an outcome of the events, mammography screening rates ranged from 4.8% to 88%, Pap testing was 3.9%, and clinical breast exams ranged from 9.1% to 100%. For colorectal screening, FOBT ranged from 29.4% to 76%, and sigmoidoscopy was 100% at one event. Outcome measures included intentions to get screened, scheduled appointments, uptake of clinical exams, and participation in cancer screening. Special events found in the review varied and used evidence-based strategies. Screening data suggest that some special events can lead to increases in cancer screening, especially if they provide onsite screening services. However, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that special events are effective in increasing cancer screening. The heterogeneity of populations served, event activities, outcome variables assessed, and the reliance on self-report to measure screening limit conclusions. This study highlights the need for further research to determine the effectiveness of special events to increase cancer screening.
    BMC Public Health 03/2014; 14(1):274. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-274 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "While cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality among non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics, cancer is the leading cause of death among APIs, both nationally in 2007 (106.7 per 100,000) and in NYC in 2010 (105.9 per 100,000) [3, 4]. APIs experience lower death rates for certain common cancers (i.e., lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate) than other racial/ethnic groups in the United States [5]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Asians and Pacific Islanders' (APIs) leading cause of death is cancer. We compared APIs' age-adjusted cancer mortality rates to other racial/ethnic groups and by API subgroup (i.e., Chinese, Koreans, Asian Indians, and Filipinos) using New York City (NYC) Mortality data and Census Bureau population estimates for 2001-2010. While other racial/ethnic groups' overall cancer mortality rates declined in NYC during the last decade, APIs remained stable. APIs overall had the lowest mortality rates for more common cancer types (i.e., lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate), but the highest mortality rates for certain less common cancers (i.e., nasopharyngeal, stomach, and liver). Chinese New Yorkers' lung cancer death rates were very high compared to other APIs and comparable to non-Hispanic whites (47.1/100,000 versus 49.5/100,000, resp.). Chinese men had much higher nasopharyngeal cancer mortality rates (4.5/100,000 versus 0.3/100,000 for non-Hispanic whites). Korean men had the highest liver and stomach cancer mortality rates (25.3/100,000 and 27.7/100,000, resp., versus 7.9/100,000 and 6.0/100,000 for non-Hispanic whites). Analysis of cancer rates by API subgroup provides the detailed information needed to plan cancer prevention efforts. These findings warrant consideration of targeted cancer mortality prevention efforts for affected subgroups, including hepatitis vaccination, screening, and treatment; smoking cessation; and cancer screening.
    Journal of Cancer Epidemiology 12/2013; 2013(12):986408. DOI:10.1155/2013/986408
Show more