Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate
ABSTRACT Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is a distinct clinicopathologic entity, characterized by an expansile proliferation of secretory cells within prostatic ducts and acini that demonstrate marked architectural and cytologic atypia. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is strongly associated with high-grade and high-volume, invasive prostate cancer and a poorer prognosis than cases without IDC-P.
To review the historic perspectives, pathologic and genetic features, diagnostic criteria and differential diagnoses, and the clinical significance of IDC-P.
Relevant studies indexed in PubMed.
It is critical to recognize IDC-P, especially in prostate biopsies in which the clinical implications of IDC-P are greatest. Morphologic criteria have been proposed to distinguish IDC-P from several other lesions with similar histologic appearance such as high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, invasive cribriform prostate cancer, and urothelial carcinoma involving the prostate. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is an uncommon finding in prostate biopsies, and it is even rarer as an isolated finding without concomitant prostate cancer in biopsies. However, patients with isolated IDC-P in biopsies are recommended for either definitive treatment or immediate repeat biopsy.
- SourceAvailable from: Antonio Lopez-Beltran
European Urology 06/2012; 62(3):518-22. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.062 · 12.48 Impact Factor
- "Lesions that fell short of these criteria but were still felt to be more ominous than HGPIN were labeled atypical intraductal proliferations when the differential diagnosis was between HGPIN and IDC-P . This diagnostic approach is summarized in Figure 2 and provides specific criteria for the diagnosis of IDC-P  "
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Recurrent gene fusions have been thought to play a central role in leukemias, lymphomas, and sarcomas, but they have been neglected in carcinomas, largely because of technical limitations of cytogenetics. In the past few years, an increasing number of recurrent gene fusions have been recognized in epithelial cancers. The majority of prostate cancers, for example, have an androgen-regulated fusion of one of the ETS transcription factor gene family. Notably, the fusion genes can often serve as specific diagnostic markers, criteria of molecular classification and therefore potential therapeutic targets. Recent studies have focused on investigations of morphologic features (phenotype) of recurrent gene fusions (genotype) in malignancies. In this review, we will summarize the histologic features of known recurrent genomic rearrangements in carcinomas, especially focusing on TMPRSS2-ERG fusion in prostate cancer, EML4-ALK in lung cancer, ETV6-NTRK3 in secretory breast cancer, RET/PTC and PAX8/PPARγ1 rearrangements in thyroid cancer. In addition, we will describe how these features could potentially be used to alert the pathologists of the diagnosis of fusion-positive tumor. A combination of histologic validation with other screening strategies (eg, immunohistochemistry) for recognition of recurrent gene fusions is also highlighted.Advances in anatomic pathology 11/2012; 19(6):417-24. DOI:10.1097/PAP.0b013e318273baae · 3.10 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Although the term "intraductal carcinoma of the prostate" (IDC-P) was introduced almost 40 years ago, there is still the lack of appreciation that this entity represents a clinically aggressive disease that continues to be misreported under the diagnostic category of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). METHODS: Recent data obtained from histological, molecular, and clinical studies were reviewed to demonstrate that IDC-P significantly differs from HGPIN, and has a major impact in terms of diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of prostate cancer (PCa). RESULTS: HGPIN is the only accepted precursor of PCa. Its diagnosis in prostate biopsies has no prognostic implications, and does not dictate therapeutic decisions. By contrast, IDC-P correlates with a worse pathological and clinical outcome. IDC-P differs from HGPIN by distinct histological and molecular features. Recent clinical studies report that IDC-P is associated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and, chemotherapy (CT) failure as well as early disease recurrence after external beam radiation. Finally, IDC-P is associated with TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion, which was reported to be regulated by estrogens and their receptors. CONCLUSIONS: IDC-P is an aggressive phenotype of prostate cancer and predicts poor response to ADT, CT, and external beam radiation. IDC-P should be separated from HGPIN and should be reported in prostate biopsies and prostatectomy specimens. Prostate © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.The Prostate 03/2013; 73(4). DOI:10.1002/pros.22579 · 3.57 Impact Factor