Selected Common Diagnostic Problems in Urologic Pathology Perspectives From a Large Consult Service in Genitourinary Pathology

Departments of Pathology and Urology, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (Impact Factor: 2.84). 04/2012; 136(4):360-71. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0187-RA
Source: PubMed


Several common differential diagnoses are encountered in urologic pathology, frequently causing patient referrals for a second opinion.
To review 3 common differential diagnoses encountered in a large consultation service in genitourinary pathology, including partial atrophy versus prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma, oncocytoma versus chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma in situ versus normal urothelium and reactive atypia. We will discuss the detailed, morphologically distinctive features and the usefulness of immunohistochemistry.
Personal experience and review of the current literature.
Careful morphologic assessment and awareness of diagnostic pitfalls are fundamental in reaching a definitive diagnosis in most cases. Immunohistochemistry is useful but should be used only in conjunction with the morphologic impression.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The spectrum of morphology in non-neoplastic prostate includes lesions of prostatic epithelial origin, the most common being atrophy, including partial atrophy, adenosis (atypical adenomatous hyperplasia), basal cell hyperplasia and crowded benign glands, as well as those of non-prostatic origin, such as seminal vesicle epithelium. These lesions often mimic lower-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma whereas others, such as granulomatous prostatitis, for example, are in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, Gleason grades 4 or 5. Diagnostic awareness of the salient histomorphological and relevant immunohistochemical features of these prostatic pseudoneoplasms is critical to avoid rendering false positive diagnoses of malignancy.
    Histopathology 01/2012; 60(1):41-58. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04000.x · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Flat bladder lesions comprise a spectrum of morphologic changes ranging from reactive atypia to carcinoma in situ (CIS). Differentiating these lesions is important because of differences in patient management and clinical outcome. The precise nature of precursor lesions of bladder cancer remains incompletely understood. Urothelial CIS is the most definitely characterized precursor lesion of high grade bladder cancer. Atypia of unknown significance (AUS) is somewhat controversial. For practical purposes, AUS and reactive urothelial changes should be considered a single entity, since neither lesion has established preneoplastic potential. Simple hyperplasia and papillary hyperplasia are recently identified putative preneoplastic lesions. More recent molecular data also support the precursor nature of intestinal metaplasia and keratinizing squamous metaplasia. In this review, we also discuss the utility of molecular ancillary studies in establishing premalignant lesions, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of flat bladder lesions.
    Diagnostic Histopathology 10/2013; 19(10):355–365. DOI:10.1016/j.mpdhp.2013.08.003
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The penile urethra has a distinctive morphology not yet fully characterized by immunohistochemistry. In addition, both urothelial and squamous cell carcinomas have been reported in the penile urethra, and the distinction between these 2 tumors might be difficult. The purposes of this study are to assess the histology and immunohistochemical profile (CK20, CK7, p63, and GATA3) of the penile urethra and to assess the usefulness of Trans-acting T-cell-specific transcription factor (GATA3) and human papillomavirus detection in distinguishing urothelial versus squamous cell carcinomas. Normal penile urethra was evaluated in 11 total penectomies. The penile urethra was lined by 2 cell layers: a superficial single layer of CK7+, CK20-, and p63- columnar cells and a deep stratified layer of CK7-, CK20-, and p63+ cubical cells. Both layers were GATA3+, supporting urothelial differentiation. In addition, 2 tissue microarrays and 6 surgical specimens of primary tumors of the penile urethra (3 urothelial and 3 squamous cell carcinomas) were evaluated for GATA3 expression. In the tissue microarrays, 22 of 25 upper tract urothelial carcinomas and 0 of 38 penile squamous cell carcinomas were GATA3+. In the surgical specimens, GATA3 was positive in all urothelial carcinomas and negative in all squamous cell carcinomas. Human papillomavirus was detected in 2 of 3 squamous cell carcinomas and in 0 of 3 of the urothelial carcinomas. In conclusion, the penile urethra is covered by epithelial cells that are unique in morphology and immunohistochemical profile. In addition, our study suggests that GATA3 and human papillomavirus detection are useful markers for distinguishing urothelial carcinomas from squamous cell carcinomas of the penile urethra.
    Human pathology 10/2013; 44(12). DOI:10.1016/j.humpath.2013.07.023 · 2.77 Impact Factor
Show more