Article

Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? (How) the Internet influences vaccination decisions: recent evidence and tentative guidelines for online vaccine communication.

University of Erfurt, Germany.
Vaccine (Impact Factor: 3.49). 03/2012; 30(25):3723-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.078
Source: PubMed
1 Bookmark
 · 
279 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Internet is a primary source for health-related information, and Internet search activity is associated with infectious disease outbreaks. The authors hypothesized that Internet search activity for vaccine-related information would predict vaccination coverage. They examined Internet search activity for H1N1 and human papilloma virus (HPV) disease and vaccine information in relation to H1N1 and HPV vaccine uptake. Google Insight for Search was used to assess the volume of Internet search queries for H1N1- and vaccine-related terms in the United States in 2009, the year of the H1N1 pandemic. Vaccine coverage data were also obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at the state level for H1N1 vaccinations in 2009. These same measures were collected at the state level for HPV- and vaccine-related search terms in 2010 as well as HPV vaccine uptake in that year. Analyses showed that the search terms H1N1 and vaccine were correlated with H1N1 vaccine uptake; ordinal regression found the H1N1 search term was independently associated with H1N1 vaccine coverage. Similarly, the correlation between vaccine search volume and HPV coverage was significant; ordinal regression showed the search term vaccine independently predicted HPV vaccination coverage. This is among the first studies to show that Internet search activity is associated with vaccination coverage. The Internet should be exploited as an opportunity to dispel vaccine misinformation by providing accurate information to support vaccine decision making.
    Journal of Health Communication 09/2014; · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vaccination centres in the Campania Region, southern Italy, vaccinate children with a hexavalent vaccine that contains the mandatory vaccines diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, and viral Hepatitis B. This vaccine also includes two non-mandatory vaccines, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type B. Information about these optional vaccines should be communicated to the parents, and informed consent should be obtained from parents before vaccination. We explored whether informed consent was delivered to the parents, whether they signed the consent form, and whether they read and acquired the information about the vaccination that their child would receive. Childhood immunisations are provided at specific public health vaccination centres, "Unita Operative Materno-infantili's" (UOMIs). We selected four UOMI from the Campania Region where we interviewed 1039 parents bringing their children for the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd doses of hexavalent vaccine. The consent forms were collected from the four vaccination centres and were analysed with respect to clarity and completeness. Most of the respondents (89.5%) were mothers between 20 and 39 years of age (80.4% vs 59.6% of the fathers), they were married (87.2% vs 93.5% of the fathers), and only one-half of them were employed (50.2% vs 92.6% of the fathers). The informed consent form was received from 58.1% of the parents and signed by 52.8%, but read by 35.0% of them. Only 1.5% of parents knew which vaccines were mandatory, and 25.0% of them believed that the entire hexavalent vaccine was mandatory. When we asked the parents which non-mandatory vaccinations were administered to their children, only 0.5% indicated the Haemophilus influenzae type B and none indicated the pertussis vaccine. Thirty-six per cent of the parents replied that their child had not received any non-mandatory vaccines. No parents were informed by the operators that their children would receive non-mandatory vaccines. In our study, consent procedures did not allow parents to acquire correct information about vaccine options for their children. Furthermore, not one health care provider informed parents that their child was receiving non-mandatory vaccines. The informed consent process and the individual health care providers did not properly inform parents about the vaccines administered to their children.
    BMC Public Health 02/2014; 14(1):211. · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die weltweite Elimination der Masern ist erklärtes Ziel der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO). Als eine der kritischen Herausforderungen für das Erreichen dieses Zieles benennt die WHO für Länder wie Deutschland das ,,Management von Wahrnehmungen und Fehlwahrnehmungen“ (,,perceptions and misperceptions“): Impfkritik und Falschwissen sind beispielsweise im Internet leicht verfügbar und schüren Fehlwahrnehmungen, Vorbehalte und Ängste gegenüber Impfungen. Hingegen kennt kaum noch jemand das Erscheinungsbild der Masern, da diese durch den Erfolg der Impfungen selten auftreten. Masern werden dadurch häufig fälschlicherweise für eine harmlose Kinderkrankheit gehalten. Die Aufklärung über Infektions- und Impfrisiken – verbunden mit der erfolgreichen Entkräftung von Impfkritik – sollte daher ein effektives Management von Wahrnehmungen und Fehlwahrnehmungen bestimmen.Ziel des vorliegenden Beitrags ist es, hierfür konkrete Hinweise zur Diskussion zu stellen. Dabei soll der janusköpfigen Rolle des Internets Rechnung getragen werden: zum einen als Quelle von impfgegnerischen Falschinformationen und den daraus folgenden Fehlwahrnehmungen. Zum anderen wird das Internet als ideales Mittel zur Aufklärung und Korrektur von kursierendem Falschwissen diskutiert, da auch Gesundheitsorganisationen es zunehmend als Informationsplattform nutzen.Der vorliegende Beitrag macht Vorschläge, wie ein effektives Management auf verschiedenen Ebenen der Informationsanbieter machbar sein könnte und wie das Internet aktiv dafür eingesetzt werden kann. Eine kommentierte Linksammlung empfiehlt Internetressourcen für Patienten und Berufstätige im Gesundheitsbereich.
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 01/2013; 56(9). · 1.01 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
79 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014